에어드랍 프로젝트 FDV $3B 클럽 2026년도는 없다.. #에어드랍
❤1

Channel
@airdrop_kor
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,319subscribers
-406 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001388662682 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @airdrop_kor |
| Description | 🇰🇷트위터: https://twitter.com/AirdropKor_eth 텔레그램공지방 : t.me/airdrop_kor 텔레그램채팅방: t.me/airdropchatting 텔레그램 문의 : @airdropkoreahelp |
| Created | 10 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/airdrop_kor |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:50 | 21,319 | -16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:55 | 21,335 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 21,342 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:50 | 21,349 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 21,358 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:26 | 21,365 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 21,373 | -17 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:54 | 21,390 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 21,397 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 21,405 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:11 | 21,418 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 21,424 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 21,438 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 21,448 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 21,455 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 21,461 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 21,472 | -19 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 21,491 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:58 | 21,509 | -20 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:47 | 21,529 | first reading |
277 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 277 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 49,112 |
| Reactions total | 89 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
485 reactions across 221 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 336 | 69.3% | |
| 👍 | 126 | 26.0% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 2.68% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 1.24% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.825% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 225 of the 277 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 485 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 277 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (4.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
에어드랍 프로젝트 FDV $3B 클럽 2026년도는 없다.. #에어드랍
❤1
고팍스 상태가 이상하네요 보안 강화를 위한 선제적인 조치로 가상자산 전량을 콜드 월렛에 이전하고 모든 매매 서비스를 일시 중단했다고 하는데 실제로 거래소에 들어가 보면 아무것도 안 뜨기까지 하는 상황입니다.
❤2
📈RISEx 독도대회는 마감 상금 66,000불에 포인트 8400점이나 상위 70명한테 주겟네요. 커트라인 볼륨은 8m 정도인듯 최종순위 확인하기 https://www.dokdodao.io/campaigns/103328384272093184?page=5
❤2
✅ Mira Network, Sterling 출시 Sterling이란? - AI 모델 제공업체를 직접 테스트하고 검증하는 추론 서비스 - 검증을 통과한 업체를 통해 AI 추론 요청을 처리 - 이용자가 업체별 성능을 일일이 비교하지 않아도 신뢰할 수 있는 서비스를 제공하는 것이 목표 같은 AI 모델인데 성능은 다르다? - 동일한 AI 모델이라도 제공업체에 따라 실제 성능에 차이가 발생 - gpt-oss-120b 벤치마크에서 업체별 점수가 36.7%~93.3%로 큰 격차 발생 - 일부 업체는 더 작은 모델을 제공하거나 특정 기능을 제한하는 경우 있음 결국 같은 모델을 사용하더라도 실제로 어떤 성능을 제공받느냐가 중요한데, Mira는 모델 자체의 성능뿐아니라 서비스 제공 과정의 신뢰성에 주목하는중. AI 서비스가 많고 다양해지는만큼 앞으로는 …
🏦 Binance$PREDICT 에어드랍 일정 관련 공지 바이낸스 월렛에서 $PREDICT 에어드랍 물량 지급 방식에 대한 안내가 나왔네요. 기존에 예정된 지급 일정과 설문 제출 마감일은 그대로 유지된다고 합니다. 지급 일정 - 11월 6일 / 13일 / 20일 / 27일 - 토큰 상장일 지급분도 별도로 예정 ※ $PREDICT 상장이 예정된 지급일보다 늦어질 경우 미지급 물량은 상장 이후 첫 지급 일정에 합산해 배포 참고할 점 - 기존 설문을 다시 제출할 필요는 없음 - 에어드랍 자격은 각 회차의 기존 설문 마감일을 기준으로 판단 X 원문
❤2
🔴 $76,500 @bitcoin_price
❤1
📣 가상자산 과세 2년 유예 확정되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 보도, 참고자료 코인과세가 2년 공식 유예되었습니다. 여당, 야당 모두 당대표가 공식 건의하고 행정부까지 동의했습니다. 세법개정안 개정은 확정이고 연말 표결만 거치면 됩니다. 2년 유예와 함께, 3년간의 손실 이월공제도 재정경제부 발표에 포함되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 부총리 브리핑 자료 원문보러가기 정말 수고 많으셨습니다. 트위터에도 올려놨어요.
❤2
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 콜렉터크립트(CARDS) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 2026-11-05 15:03:03
🦮오랜만에 포켓몬 빈티지 카드들은 오히려 가치를 인정받아서인지 전부 ATH 찍는 듯 저 카드도 5800불에 샀는데 TCG 하락에도 불구하고 10000불이 넘어버림 같은 시기에 산 비교적 최근에 나온 카드들은 -50% 토막 빔 맞고 있는 와중에도 빈티지만 모았다면 문제 없었을듯 ㄴㅇㅅ
❤4
유예 감사합니다
❤2
[머니투데이] [속보] 코스피 매도 사이드카 발동…지수 5500 반납 • 한국거래소가 5일 오전 10시16분 코스피 시장에 프로그램 매도호가 일시효력정지(매도 사이드카)를 발동함. • 코스피200 선물가격이 전 거래일 대비 5% 이상 하락한 상태가 1분간 지속되어 5분간 효력이 정지되었으며, 올해 코스피 56번째이자 매도 방향 29번째 발동임. • 이날 코스피 지수는 전일 대비 103.71포인트(1.82%) 내린 5580.09로 출발한 뒤 낙폭을 키워 5500선을 반납함. 🔗자세히 보기 📊시장 현황 📲앱 다운로드
비트 80K 복귀
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 277 posts we hold for @airdrop_kor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 59 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)” (@airdrop_kor), 21,319 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdrop_kor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.