Channel
@baekobaeko
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,185subscribers
-111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001506734499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baekobaeko |
| Created | 10 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baekobaeko |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 8,185 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 8,193 | -11 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 8,204 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 8,207 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:14 | 8,216 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 8,229 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 8,232 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 8,244 | -17 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 8,261 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 8,269 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 8,276 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 8,286 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 8,291 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 8,296 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 8,296 | first reading |
78 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (30 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,490 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
132 reactions across 52 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 74.2% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 25.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
늦게 일어난만큼 욕하면서 그냥 매수 했습니다 재료 자체는 정말 괜찮다고 생각해요 1. 뱅어가 아주 필요한 베이스 2. 그런데 나타난 자체 네러티브 순수 밈 3. 하필 이름도 "베이스라인" 4. 본인들이 밀어주는 o1 런치패드 출신 5. 동시에 pvp 거의 없는 베이스 이미 많이 올라와서 4M 구간이라 비싸다면 꽤 비싼 구간인데 싸다고 생각하면 아직은 배팅이 가능한 구간이긴합니다 그리고 사실 베이스 뱅어 기다리는 입장에서 놓쳐버리면 fomo 굉장히 쎄게 올거같아서 수익금 뱉어낸다는 생각으로 매수 넣었습니다. 이젠 기도해 기도.
👍3
앤스로픽, 노동절 이후 IPO 투자설명서 공개 예정 앤트로픽은 9월 중순에 투자자 설명회를 개최할 예정이며, 기업공개(IPO)는 9월 말 또는 10월 초에 이루어질 가능성이 높습니다. 노동절은 9월 7일.
❤1
최근 있었던 바운티 중에 제일 큼직했던 것 같긴하네요 LFG Lighter
🍿 저스틴썬이 올린 유명 여배우 장톈과 5천만 달러 저스틴썬이 유명 여배우와 사귀면서 느낀점을 공개적으로 X에 업로드했는데요 원문을 중국어로 겁나 길게 적어놔서 지피티한테 요약을 부탁했습니다. 1. 화자(저스틴썬)는 2007년 대학생 시절부터 징톈을 동경했다. QQ에서 본 흐릿한 광고 사진을 저장하고, 학교 SNS에서 친구 신청까지 했지만 거절당했다. 이후 부자가 된 뒤에도 그 사진을 계속 가지고 다닌다. 2. 19년 후 엄청난 부자가 된 화자는 실제로 징톈과 만나 연인이 된다. 그녀가 원하는 것은 무엇이든 해준다. 영화관 전체를 빌리고, 호텔 한 층을 통째로 비우고, 전용기를 띄우고, 여행지 전체에서 사실상 그녀만 존재하도록 만든다. 3. 징톈은 자신 때문에 세상이 비워지는 것을 좋아하는 사람처럼 묘사된다. 사람이 없는 호텔, 아무…
❤1
트럼프 반도체 관세?
이거때문에 SKT 장투 걱정됐는데 빠른 분사로 걱정을 덜어주시는....
[단독] SK텔레콤·SK브로드밴드, AI 데이터센터 사업 분사 https://biz.chosun.com/it-science/ict/2026/08/27/VN3C42QIMNAYPER2VIIVWOZ3NY/
브루노마스 내한 ㄷㄷ
👍1
스테이블코인 그리고 RWA 메타버스 다음의 키워드
❤2
*JP모건 체이스, 자체 스테이블코인 개발 검토 중: 월스트리트저널 *은행들, 글로벌 스테이블코인 컨소시엄 결성에 박차: 월스트리트저널 *뱅크오브아메리카, 웰스파고, 산탄데르 등 스테이블코인 컨소시엄 참여: 월스트리트저널 $CRCL
❤1
레이어제로, 시타델·DTCC와 협력해 신규 거래소 출시 자체 네트워크 + 기관용 거래소 + 개인용 거래소 https://research.4pillars.io/ko/research/zero-layerzeros-vision-for-the-blockchain-endgame 한번 읽어보시고 다음 크립토 불장의 대장주가 될 가능성이 높아보입니다.
❤2
삼성전자 - 200 만주 하이닉스 - 65 만주 내일 바이백 예정. 삼성전자는 첫날만 180만주 하고 계속 200만주 바이백하네요
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @baekobaeko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@baekobaeko edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“백호의 투자갤러리” (@baekobaeko), 8,185 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baekobaeko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.