https://www.bitlayer.org/bridge 지금 클레임 되는데 브릿지써서 이더체인으로 날려야 거래소입금가능
❤2

Channel
@LEEHEESANGDYOR
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,779subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001917610401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LEEHEESANGDYOR |
| Created | 6 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LEEHEESANGDYOR |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 8,779 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 8,786 | +10 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 8,776 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 8,794 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 8,810 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 8,817 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 8,816 | +16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 8,800 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 8,808 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 8,817 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 8,824 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 8,825 | +15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 8,810 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (3 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,035 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
185 reactions across 58 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 163 | 88.1% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 5.95% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.16% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 2.16% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.62% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.bitlayer.org/bridge 지금 클레임 되는데 브릿지써서 이더체인으로 날려야 거래소입금가능
❤2
예? 5시간뒤 클레임인데 감사합니다감사합니다감사합니다
❤2
채널에서 Umia를 많이 다뤘기도하고, 제가 보기에도 혼란스러운 상황이라 뭐가 맞는지 확인해보고자, 유미아 공식 채팅방을 쭉 살펴봤네요 (경매시작인 새벽 1시이후부터) 1. 얼리 비딩 단계의 상위 지갑들 ($1.2M, $1M) > 사전에 약속된 탑 VC들이며, 향후 Umia에서 출시될 프로젝트들을 지원하는 데 활용될 예정 2. 얼리 비딩의 개별/전체 캡은 ‘zkTLS(MetaDAO, Echo), Kleros, 전략적 펀드/엔젤’ 등 카테고리별로 다름 3. 얼리 비딩 참여자와 퍼블릭 참여자는 동일한 가격에 동일한 비율로 물량을 배분받음 (퍼블릭 첫 블록부터 토큰 실 판매가 시작됨) > 기존 7일(얼리3일+퍼블릭4일)로 예정되어 있던 CCA를 4일로 단축하고 얼리 비딩의 이점을 줄임 > 현재의 높은 수요에서는, 경매에 참여할 수 있다는 것 자…
삼성전자 - 200만주 SK하이닉스 - 65만주 내일도 변동없이 바이백 예정입니다. 참고하시기 바랍니다.
❤4
bitlayer 에어드랍 마지막 베스팅 내일인데,, 이 근본적인 무빙 뭐지요. 마지막 에어드랍 클레임이 내일저녁 7시 예정입니다. 마지막 뽀찌까지 완벽하네요.. 이대로만 유지해다오.. 🖥 클레임링크
여기 보면 기존에 본인이 제작한 AI 영상들이 잇다면, 작품을 제출하면 크레딧을 지원해주는듯. 저는 괜찬게 뽑힌작품들로 크레딧 신청햇네요. 우측상단에 보시면 신청하는 버튼이 있습니다!
❤2
AI영상 제작 이벤트 (한국인 할당 o) 카이토에서 Newtake라는 프로젝트랑 AI 영상제작을 두고 이벤트를 개최하네요 중요한점은 한국인 전용 할당 이벤트가 있다는것 [보상, 조건 ] - 한국 문화와 관련된 45초이상 영상 제작 - 할당 100명까지 - 30만원 Newtake를 가입하면 크레딧을 주는데 어쨌든 저기서 제작해야할듯? 여행 영상제작은 제가 평소에 자주 만들기도 하고, 최근에 AI로 영상제작 많이 했으니 저는 100계정 할 예정 이벤트 전문확인
❤3
☑️ Linera 토큰세일 추가정보 떳네요 8월 24일부터 Sonar를 통한 사전등록/KYC가 시작. 9월 1일 세일 시작 → 9월 8일 커밋 종료 → 9월 15일 최종 배정 확정 → 토큰 배포일은 추후 발표 - 세일관련정보 1. 전체 토큰의 5%를 커뮤니티 세일로 판매 2. 세일 물량은 TGE 때 100% 언락 기존 Linera 활동으로 Badge를 가진 사람은 Guaranteed Allocation을 받을 수 있음 (Guaranteed Allocation은 Linera 앱에서 활동해 Badge를 획득한 기존 유저용으로 세일 물량 일부를 별로도 보장받는것) 3. 일반 참여자는 Open Pool에서 참여 가능 4. 사람이 너무 많이 몰리면 비례 배정(Pro-rata) 방식 5. 배정 못 받은 돈은 USDC로 환불 6. 최소 참여금은 $1…
❤3
퍼시피카 서울 밋업 🇰🇷 저희 팀이 다음 달 한국 블록체인 위크 참석차 서울에 방문합니다! 서울에서 밋업을 개최할 예정이니 많은 참여 부탁드립니다! 🌊 이번 행사는 초대받은 분들만 참석하실 수 있습니다. 아래에서 신청해 주세요. 서울에서 뵙겠습니다! https://luma.com/1el9k3dr
❤🔥3
삼성전자 - 200 만주 하이닉스 - 65 만주 내일 바이백 예정. 삼성전자는 첫날만 180만주 하고 계속 200만주 바이백하네요
❤2
☑️ 미국 국채 바이백, 생각보다 단순한 호재는 아닐수도? 아까 미 재무부가 장기 국채 바이백을 확대하면서 시장에서는 이를 유동성 호재로 받아들이는 분위기가 있음. 개인적으로 전체 구조를 보면 오히려 미국 국채시장의 수급 문제가 생각보다 심각하다는 신호에 가깝다고 봄. 현재 미국은 재정적자 확대 → 국채 발행 증가 → 해외 수요 약화 → 장기금리 상승 → 재무부가 장기채 바이백으로 금리 안정 시도 라는 상황. 특히 문제는 중국과 일본. 일본: $1.143조 → $1.117조 중국: $6,593억 → $6,334억 으로 모두 감소. 중국의 미국채 보유량은 2008년 이후 최저 수준 그런데 더 눈여겨볼 부분은 단기 미국채 까지 매도가 나오고 있다는 점. 일본의 단기 미 국채 보유액은 4월 $1,533억 → 5월 $936억 → 6…
❤3
삼성전자 - 200만주 SK하이닉스 - 65만주 내일 바이백예정. 전자는 오늘보다 20만주 더 매수하네요
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @LEEHEESANGDYOR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“개인적인 DYOR🦅” (@LEEHEESANGDYOR), 8,779 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LEEHEESANGDYOR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.