📉📉 우리 본진도 하염없이 털리는 중 난이도 진짜 개빡이네
❤4

Channel
@leedogin2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,416subscribers
+190 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001725574634 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leedogin2 |
| Description | #이도진 메타버스 Official 공지방 공지방 : https://t.me/leedogin2 채팅방 : https://t.me/chat_dogin 유튜브 : https://www.youtube.com/@leedogin DM : @leedogin2022 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leedogin2 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:10 | 15,416 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:01 | 15,424 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:59 | 15,432 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:26 | 15,437 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 15,441 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:07 | 15,442 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 15,448 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 15,458 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 15,464 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 15,471 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 15,480 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 15,486 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 15,479 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 15,484 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:50 | 15,492 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 15,500 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 15,508 | -20 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 15,528 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 15,535 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 15,540 | first reading |
532 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 68 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 532 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 55,682 |
| Reactions total | 260 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,831 reactions across 487 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,936 | 40.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,077 | 22.3% | |
| 👏 | 926 | 19.2% | |
| 🔥 | 482 | 9.98% | |
| 😱 | 146 | 3.02% | |
| 👎 | 69 | 1.43% | |
| 🖕 | 61 | 1.26% | |
| 😁 | 52 | 1.08% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 0.31% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 0.269% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 0.248% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 0.166% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 0.166% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 0.124% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 0.103% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.103% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.083% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.083% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.021% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.021% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 511 of the 532 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,058 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 532 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 532 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 79 posts held from the last 30 days (22.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📉📉 우리 본진도 하염없이 털리는 중 난이도 진짜 개빡이네
❤4
진짜 절망적인 상황이네
🤮1😱1
트럼프 일가 코인으로만 3조원“... 美민주당, 재산증식 의혹 다 턴다 세 번재 탄핵소추 가능성까지 거론 뉴스 #트럼프
❤1🔥1
워뇨띠 오늘자 주식 근황 +5.4억 출처
❤2🔥1
1분투자, 간단하게 에어드랍 노려보기 : PolyPerps 한차례 소개했던 폴리마켓이 새롭게 발촉한 펍덱, PolyPerps 에서 커뮤니티 이벤트를 진행합니다. 복잡한거 없이 SNS 미션만으로 가능하니까 다들 참전해보세요 1. 이벤트 1 : 총상금 $1,500 - 1등($500), 2등($300), 3등($200), 추가 100명(각 $5) - X 게시글 좋아요 리포스트, 댓글 l 구글폼 제출 - 11/4 - 11/16 2. 이벤트 2 : 텔레그램 구독 - 1등($100), 2등($50, 3명) 등 행운상까지 지급 - 채널 구독 l 텔레방 입장 l 폼 제출 - 기간 : 11/1 - 11/30 현재 트레이딩 대회도 진행중이고, 총 상금 $50K 이벤트 진행중입니다. 트레이딩 대회보다도 쌀먹 노려보실 분들은 신청해보세요 트레이딩 대회 …
❤3🔥2
어머..
😱2
🎄더현대 서울 크리스마스 빌리지 사전 예약 잠시후 오후 6시 사전 예약 열립니다 매년 더현대에서 하는건데 한번도 안가보셨으면 한번 가볼만함 사전 예약시 무료 입장 - 예약 가능 기간 : 11월 10일 ~ 25일 - 최대 4인까지 예약 가능 네이버 예약
❤1
☑️ 슬슬 TGE 각 냄새 맡고 있나, 자체 메인넷 출시한 Bullbit 근황 최근 하리나, dYdX 처럼 자체 블록체인 운영하는 거래소들이 주목받고 있는데, 불빗도 자체 메인넷으로 완전히 자립했습니다. ✔26년 로드맵 예정순서 - 거래소 출시 » TGE » 테스트넷 » 메인넷 출시 계획 - BullBit 사용자, 로그인 시 그대로 동일하게 사용 가능 * 자체 PassKey 보유한 네이티브 L1 * 준비금 증명 투명성, 자체 500ms 블록타임 구축 올해, 다양한 이벤트를 진행하면서 한국인들한테도 이제는 친숙해진 플젝인데, 슬슬 TGE 각이 보이는지 내심 기대중
❤2👏1
진짜 제일 기대되고 다행스러운 포인트 '향후 3년간 손실이월 공제' * 향후 발생 된 손실에 대해 손실 이월제도를 통해 세금 감면해주는 제도
❤4🔥1
아 ...유예 테마주를 생각 못했구나
❤2👍1😁1
📣 가상자산 과세 2년 유예 확정되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 보도, 참고자료 코인과세가 2년 공식 유예되었습니다. 여당, 야당 모두 당대표가 공식 건의하고 행정부까지 동의했습니다. 세법개정안 개정은 확정이고 연말 표결만 거치면 됩니다. 2년 유예와 함께, 3년간의 손실 이월공제도 재정경제부 발표에 포함되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 부총리 브리핑 자료 원문보러가기 정말 수고 많으셨습니다. 트위터에도 올려놨어요.
[마켓 추가] 마그마파이낸스(MAGMA) 원화 마켓 추가 https://feed.bithumb.com/notice/1655524
Showing the 12 most recent of 532 posts we hold for @leedogin2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@leedogin2 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 97 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@leedogin2 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅” (@leedogin2), 15,416 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leedogin2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.