비트겟 출금 지원 일정 한국시간 기준 9월 28일 17:00 — BTC (Bitcoin Network) • 9월 29일 17:00 — ETH (Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism) • 9월 30일 17:00 — USDT (Ethereum, BSC, Solana, Tron) • 10월 2일 17:00 — 기타 토큰 / 법정화폐 / P2 비트겟 보호기금이 고객돈 모두 커버 가능하다네요. #비트겟
❤7👍4👀2

Channel
@officialunivercityofcrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,979subscribers
-381 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001782102113 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @officialunivercityofcrypto |
| Description | 암호화폐 정보채널입니다. 제보&문의:@dan_choi 공지방 https://t.me/officialunivercityofcrypto 숙제방 https://t.me/airdropgraduation 매매방 https://t.me/allkindchallenge 졸준위 후원 메타마스크 주소 (모든 후원은 채널에 에어드랍) 0x242480d34b3b8a86544ca8e63a5b7ade63e5041a (EVM주소입니다, 이더리움 외 체인 후원가능) |
| Created | 16 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/officialunivercityofcrypto |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 22,979 | -44 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 23,023 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 23,033 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 23,039 | -31 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 23,070 | -21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 23,091 | -34 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 23,125 | -27 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 23,152 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:05 | 23,170 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:04 | 23,187 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 23,203 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 23,227 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 23,242 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 23,251 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 23,258 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 23,250 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 23,247 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 23,259 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:29 | 23,261 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 23,270 | first reading |
182 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 182 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 153,276 |
| Reactions total | 739 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,266 reactions across 175 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 898 | 39.6% | |
| 👍 | 766 | 33.8% | |
| 👀 | 427 | 18.8% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 2.56% | |
| 🙏 | 44 | 1.94% | |
| 🫡 | 41 | 1.81% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 0.353% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 0.353% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.221% | |
| 😇 | 4 | 0.177% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.132% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.088% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.088% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @officialunivercityofcrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 182 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
비트겟 출금 지원 일정 한국시간 기준 9월 28일 17:00 — BTC (Bitcoin Network) • 9월 29일 17:00 — ETH (Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism) • 9월 30일 17:00 — USDT (Ethereum, BSC, Solana, Tron) • 10월 2일 17:00 — 기타 토큰 / 법정화폐 / P2 비트겟 보호기금이 고객돈 모두 커버 가능하다네요. #비트겟
❤7👍4👀2
꽤나 많은 채널에 포워딩이 되었네요. 출금 일정 발표가 오후1시입니다. 잘못 안내드렸네요 😢
❤3👍3👀2
비트겟 출금재개는 한국시간으로 오후1시부터 가능 비트겟 출금 일정은 한국시간으로 오후1시에 발표될 예정 #비트겟
🫡5❤2👍2
바이빗: 우리 해킹때 비트겟이 도왔으니 지금 우리도 돕겠다. #중국깐부
👍16👀5❤4
CZ가 (바이낸스 창립자) 한국 BNB체인 사이드 이벤트에 한국어로 리트윗을 했네요. 여기 참여하는 프로젝트들 CZ의 가호를 받는 느낌이라 공유. ☑️한국어로 친건 처음같네? 참여 플젝명단 Four, Renaiss, CourNot, FOMO, Anoma, Primus, Ondo, TurboFlow 트윗원문 #BNB #사이드이벤트
👍5❤3👀2
증권사 직원의 오안내로 15억 청산당하고 보상금 20만원 제안 받은 아저씨… https://m.bobaedream.co.kr/board/bbs_view/freeb/3431336 홍리싵;
🙏5👀3❤1👍1
☑️온도랑 불타기 KBW사이드 이벤트 블랙락과 깐부 맺은 온도의 사이드 이벤트 안내. - 일정 : 9월 29일(화) 14시~20시 - 주최 : 미래에셋, 한화, 포필러스, Ondo - 주요 연사 : 아서헤이즈, 코같투, 불개미 - Luma 신청 링크 ☑️루마에 지갑 제출하는곳있음 깜짝 에어드랍 기대해볼만함. 또한 본 행사에는 아서헤이즈, 코같투, 불개미등 내로나하는 거물급 인사들 총출동하는 행사임. 어제 뉴스나오고 약 25~30% 상승함. 화력 확인되었으니 시간남으면 참석 해보시길! #Ondo #KBW #사이드이벤트
❤3👍3👀2
☑️풍성한 한가위 보내세요! 정신없이 달려오다 보니 어느덧 추석이 찾아왔네요. 시장 보느라, 차트 보느라, 버티느라 올해도 모두 정말 고생 많으셨습니다. 이번 연휴만큼은 잠시 차트에서 눈을 떼고 사랑하는 가족, 소중한 사람들과 맛있는 것도 많이 드시고 편안하고 행복한 시간 보내셨으면 좋겠습니다.❤️ 계좌도 보름달처럼 꽉 차오르는 날이 오길 바라며 🌕 우리 모두 졸업하는 그날까지 🎓졸업준비위원회 댄초이 올림. #행복한 #한가위
❤7👍2🔥2
한번 보안사고가 일어나면 신뢰회복은 정말 어렵습니다. 출금이 오픈된다면 자산들은 타 거래소로 이동해놓으시고 활동하시는게 정신건강에 이롭습니다.
❤5👀2👍1
비트겟 대표: ☑️이번 손실 금액은 Bitget 사용자 보호 기금의 보장 범위 내에 완전히 포함되며, 보호 기금의 현재 규모는 4.64억 달러를 보유중. *투자자 자금손실은 없을것 해서 시장이 크게 안흔들리는것 같네요. ☑️이미 취한 조치: 사건 발생 후 몇 분 내에 비상 대응 팀을 가동함. 자금 안전을 고려하여 출금 기능을 일시적으로 중단했으며, 안전 검증 완료 후 순차적으로 복구할 예정. 법 집행 기관 및 온체인 보안 기관에 통보하여 조사를 개시함. 곧 라이브 방송을 열어 여러분의 모든 질문에 직접 대면 하겠다. #비트겟 #현황
👍4❤3🙏2
Bitget 암호화폐 거래소, 대규모 해킹 후 3억 5천만 달러 이상 도난 확인 출금도 막혀있네요.
❤2👀2👍1
Bitget 지갑 보안 침해 의심, 1억 7천만 달러 이상 자산 이동 ☑️일단 빗겟에서 자산 빼시길 #비트겟 #해킹
❤3👀2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @officialunivercityofcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@officialunivercityofcrypto edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“졸업준비위원회🎓” (@officialunivercityofcrypto), 22,979 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/officialunivercityofcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.