지난 60시간 동안, Hyperliquid Strategies는 HyperCore에서 약 6천만 달러 상당의 $HYPE을, 그리고 중앙화된 거래소(CEX)에서 약 1600만 달러 상당의 HYPE을 매수했습니다. 이는 대략 92만 ~ 95만 개의 HYPE에 해당합니다.
❤1

Channel
@killberosDAO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,181subscribers
-303 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001736699211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @killberosDAO |
| Created | 6 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/killberosDAO |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 15,181 | -29 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 15,210 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 15,251 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 15,256 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 15,271 | +15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 15,256 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 15,268 | -58 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 15,326 | -35 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 15,361 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 15,366 | -28 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 15,394 | -26 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 15,420 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 15,434 | +33 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 15,401 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:29 | 15,411 | -14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 15,425 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 15,434 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 15,441 | +21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 15,420 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 15,430 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (31 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 60,858 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
44 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 70.5% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 29.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
지난 60시간 동안, Hyperliquid Strategies는 HyperCore에서 약 6천만 달러 상당의 $HYPE을, 그리고 중앙화된 거래소(CEX)에서 약 1600만 달러 상당의 HYPE을 매수했습니다. 이는 대략 92만 ~ 95만 개의 HYPE에 해당합니다.
❤1
KBW2026 , 메인 스폰서 & 주요 연사 ✅ - KBW2026 with Upbit ↳ 일정 : 9월 29일 ~ 10월 1일 9월 29일 - 업비트 인스티튜셔널 서밋 (초대 전용) 9월 30 ~ 10월 1일 - 메인 컨퍼런스 ↳ 장소 : 서울 워커힐 호텔앤리조트 - 이더리움 공동창립자 Joseph Lubin 컨퍼런스 연사 합류 - KBW2026 메인 스폰서 ↳ Upbit / 0G / Stable / Tria ✅ KBW2026 with Upbit
❤3
ENA 피스위치 활성화 프로포절 - USDe 유통량 $7.5B 돌파 시 ENA 바이백 시작 - USDe 성장에 따라 바이백 비율 5% → 최대 25% 확대 - Ethena 프로토콜 수익을 ENA 가치 환원으로 연결하는 구조 https://gov.ethenafoundation.com/t/ena-fee-switch-activation/830
대불장 마지막 할인 끝났습니다 수고하세요
🔥8
?
삼성전자 요약 1. 90~110조 정도 추가 환원할 듯 2. 3분기에는 30조 현금배당 (10월 말 이사회에서 확정) 3. 나머지는 27년 1월 말 이사회에서 결정 4. 배당 이후 남은 금액은 추가 현금배당 + 자사주 매입·소각을 조합
❤1
오늘의 단기 청산은 암호화폐 역사상 두 번째로 큰 규모 Oct 10, 2025: $2.46 Billion Aug 19, 2026: $1.74 Billion https://x.com/AshCrypto/status/2090130470616904176?s=20
❤2
하이퍼리퀴드 뉴스가 새벽에 나와서 간단히 정리해봄 (올해 있었던 일들 배경지식?차 나열) 1. 현재 미국의 경우 하이퍼리퀴드 사용이 불가능한 상태 (약관상 우회사용도 금지) 2. 하이퍼리퀴드는 올해 2월 100만 $HYPE 을 지원해 워싱턴에 Hyperliquid Policy Center(이하 HPC) 를 설립. 정책 및 로비 단체 3. 이 HPC의 최근 행보를 정리해보자면... 4월 30일 CFTC에 공식 의견서를 제출 (탈중앙 예측시장의 합법적 접근에 대한 내용이 주요골자) + 7월 9일 Phantom과 함께 CFTC에 공동의견서 제출 (기존 라이센스 있는 업체들이 퍼블릭 온체인 인프라를 이용하게 해달라는 내용) + 8월 7일 CFTC 농업자문위원회 회의에 참석해 공식 성명을 제출 (농산물, 원자재등에 무기한 선물 허용요청등)…
❤1
코인 진짜 쉴만큼 쉬었다 가보자
🔥5
비트코인 70.4k 찍고 옴 레전드 상황 발생
🟢 $69,000 @bitcoin_price
Stable , 토크노믹스 업데이트 ✅ - 기존 : TGE 이후 3년간 선형 언락 변경 : 언락 예정 물량 락업 + 27년 12월 언락 재가동 - 팀 & VC 언락 시작 26년 12월 » 27년 12월 - $STABLE 30일 거래량 가중 평균 가격 $0.0025 미만일 시 최소 3개월 연기 , 최대 9개월 연기 ✅ 트윗 본문 바로가기
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @killberosDAO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 132,465 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“킬베로스 ( Killberos ) 🐾” (@killberosDAO), 15,181 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killberosDAO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.