AI 시대 전과 후 죄다 바이브 코딩으로 개발자가 되버리는바람에 제품이 썩어넘쳐나서 유저수가 없음 #AI
❤1

Channel
@emperorcoin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,467subscribers
-60,457 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001325732918 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emperorcoin |
| Description | 마음껏 퍼가시고 성공투자를 기원 합니다. 항상 감사합니다^^ 본 채널은 검증되지않은 유형의 포스팅도 포함되어 있으며, 투자의 척도나 조언을 하지않습니다. 투자 시 원금 전액을 잃을 수 있습니다. 모든 투자 책임은 본인에게 있습니다. Contact ID : @hwangjong |
| Created | 12 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emperorcoin |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 37,467 | -67 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 37,534 | -112 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 37,646 | -131 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 37,777 | -143 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 37,920 | -182 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 38,102 | -152 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 38,254 | -50 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 38,304 | -83 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 38,387 | -48 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 38,435 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 38,470 | -79 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 38,549 | -68 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 38,617 | -86 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 38,703 | -31 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 38,734 | -60 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 38,794 | -78 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 38,872 | -235 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 39,107 | -137 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 39,244 | -99 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 39,343 | first reading |
543 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 543 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,035,601 |
| Reactions total | 3,741 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 00:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,811 reactions across 522 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,175 | 61.3% | |
| 👍 | 811 | 11.9% | |
| 🤔 | 403 | 5.92% | |
| 🤯 | 359 | 5.27% | |
| 😁 | 344 | 5.05% | |
| 👎 | 264 | 3.88% | |
| 🤪 | 148 | 2.17% | |
| 🤣 | 140 | 2.06% | |
| 😭 | 105 | 1.54% | |
| 🙏 | 62 | 0.91% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 542 of the 543 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 543 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
AI 시대 전과 후 죄다 바이브 코딩으로 개발자가 되버리는바람에 제품이 썩어넘쳐나서 유저수가 없음 #AI
❤1
아직 한번도 해본적은 없지만 상승장 팁 상승장 도중에 갑자기 -5% 이상의 급락이 나올때가 가끔씩 꼭 생기더라고요. 이 때를 대비해서 말도 안되는 저점이라 생각하는 곳에 평소 눈여겨보던 알트코인 매수 걸어두기 입니다. 이미지를 보시다시피 10%이상이 12봉이나 있어요. 여기서 알 수 있는건 레버리지 10배 이상 써서 단타를하면 상승장 중에 비트코인이더라도 무조건 한번은 터진다는 거죠. #알트코인
❤9
지난 주 토요일과 청산맵을 비교 이제는 하락도 생각을 하셔야.. 포모온 사람들이 슬슬 레버리지 껴서 롱을 치나봄 #BTC
❤9🤪1😁1
이번 상승은 신규자금 유입보다도 스퀴즈 BTC 급등은 신규 자금이 아니라 공매도 청산으로 나온 상승 가격은 올랐는데 미결제약정은 줄었다. 새로 롱을 연 게 아니라 기존 숏이 터진 것 청산 자금의 대부분(89%)이 숏이었고, 전형적인 숏 스퀴즈 1년 가까이 이어진 하락 추세도 하루 만에 깨졌고, 유동성이 얇을 때 상대를 청산시키면 그 강제 매수가 상승 연료가 된다. 👉원문 #BTC
❤20👍2😁1
Hyperliquid, 올해 수익 $429M 암호화폐 프로젝트 중 1위 #HPYE
❤9
바이낸스 선물 청산 방식이 유저한테 너무 불리하다는 비판 바이낸스는 선물 청산 때 남은 담보까지 거의 0으로 만든다. 유동성이 충분하면 2~3천 달러는 남겨줘야 하는데, 거래소가 그 돈을 가져간다는 비판 하이퍼리퀴드는 가격이 빠질 때 포지션을 조금씩 미리 줄여서, 청산돼도 돈이 남게 함. 바이낸스가 기술이 없어서가 아니라, 청산으로 잔고가 0이 되는 구조가 거래소에 유리해서 안 바꾼다는 주장 그래서 독점 거래소는 유저에게 불리하고, 하이퍼리퀴드 같은 경쟁자가 필요하다는 내용 #바이낸스
❤8👍2🤔2
피델리티의 글로벌 매크로 디렉터 주리엔 티머 "새로운 4년 주기 강세장이 진행 중이라고 감지" #피델리티 #BTC
❤9
업비트의 체인이라 불리는 GIWA의 24개 얼리 프로젝트 #GIWA
❤7
최근 중국어권에서 가장 핫한 글 夏子寒 와 대주주 葛玄天 가 마켓메이커 Rasen을 만들어, 프로젝트 돈으로 시세 조작·내부자 매매를 했다는 내용 - HUMA: 창업자가 파동 매매 자금 500만 달러를 줬는데, 내부자 매매로 까먹고 “매도 압력이 커서 그렇다”고 둘러댔다. - RIVER: 프로젝트에 1000만 달러 넘게 받아서 선물·현물을 계속 떠밀며 돈을 넣게 했고, 스테이블코인 담보와 발행까지 끌어다 썼다는 주장. - Sidekick: 마케팅부터 상장까지 다 맡았는데, 토큰이 팔려 바이낸스에서 상장폐지될 정도였고 프로젝트는 거의 못 가져갔다. 2일전 내용이긴한데 계속 이 이야기가 불이 붙고있네요. #시장
❤5
최근 30일간
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
이 회사들을 실질적으로 쥐고 있는 사람들은 유대인 코인은 대부분 인도인이던데 WEB2 찐회사들은 유대인이네 #유대인
❤7🤔1
Beldex, 결제부터 메신저·VPN·브라우저까지, 프라이버시를 기본값으로 Beldex는 프라이빗 거래를 넘어 메시징, 탈중앙화 브라우징, VPN, 디지털 신원까지 묶은 레이어 1 프라이버시 인프라로 BDX 하나로 지갑·BChat·BelNet·브라우저·BNS가 연결 요약 1) 특징 - 기본 프라이버시: 네이티브 거래에 링 서명, 스텔스 주소, RingCT 적용 - 실제 서비스: 지갑, 종단간 암호화 메신저(BChat), 탈중앙화 VPN(BelNet), 프라이버시 브라우저, .bdx 네이밍(BNS) - 네트워크: 활성 마스터노드 3,437개, 노드당 담보 10,000 BDX - 확장성: BSC 브리지, 결제·가맹점 연동, 향후 프라이버시 토큰 표준·SDK·EVM 사이드체인 - 검증: CertiK, QuillAudits, Hacken, Dak…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 543 posts we hold for @emperorcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
최근 30일간
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 543 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 122 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN” (@emperorcoin), 37,467 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emperorcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.