Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
45 measurements spanning 76 days, net +42,536. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,237–81,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Oct 2026, 18:27
71,670
-659
20 Oct 2026, 13:26
72,329
-405
19 Oct 2026, 15:00
72,734
-393
18 Oct 2026, 16:08
73,127
-223
17 Oct 2026, 17:47
73,350
-35
16 Oct 2026, 17:37
73,385
-432
15 Oct 2026, 18:27
73,817
-413
14 Oct 2026, 21:01
74,230
-569
13 Oct 2026, 12:40
74,799
+2,806
9 Oct 2026, 09:18
71,993
+5,703
4 Oct 2026, 23:56
66,290
+8,580
27 Sept 2026, 22:02
57,710
+20,242
17 Sept 2026, 18:22
37,468
+757
15 Sept 2026, 14:41
36,711
+1,261
13 Sept 2026, 21:57
35,450
+2,070
12 Sept 2026, 02:58
33,380
+3,159
9 Sept 2026, 20:38
30,221
+906
6 Sept 2026, 14:22
29,315
-71
4 Sept 2026, 04:37
29,386
-30
2 Sept 2026, 20:54
29,416
first reading
Engagement
952 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.31%
avg views ÷ 71,670 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
406 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.858%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
407
of 952 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 405 of 406 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held
952 (5 August 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total
963,821
Reactions total
8,262
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Oct 2026, 06:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 16s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,986 reactions across 948 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,638
59.1%
👍
3,870
21.5%
👌
1,254
6.97%
😁
631
3.51%
🔥
557
3.10%
😢
220
1.22%
👏
181
1.01%
🐳
172
0.956%
🥰
157
0.873%
🤯
78
0.434%
👎
69
0.384%
🤩
53
0.295%
✍
48
0.267%
🕊
24
0.133%
🏆
19
0.106%
🤔
15
0.083%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 948 of the 952 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,986 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 952 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 950 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sarmayedigital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 952 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📊 تقویم اقتصادی امروز | چهارشنبه ۲۱ اکتبر
🔹 امروز تقویم اقتصادی نسبتاً خلوت است و مهمترین رویداد، انتشار گزارش ذخایر نفت خام آمریکا خواهد بود.
🇩🇪 ۱۰:۴۵ | سخنرانی ناگل، رئیس بانک مرکزی آلمان
🇬🇧 ۱۶:۳۰ | سخنرانی رئیس بانک مرکزی انگلیس
🇺🇸 ۱۸:۰۰ | گزارش ذخایر نفت خام آمریکا (EIA) 🛢
▫️ پیشبینی: کاهش ۱۰۰ هزار بشکه
▫️ قبلی: کاهش ۸.۵۵۷ میلیون بشکه
💸 ۱۹:۳۰ | سخنرانی لاگارد، رئیس بانک مرکزی اروپا
🇺🇸 ۲۰:۳۰ | حراج اوراق خ…
💸سوئیس اولین ETF اسپات بیتکوین رو برای سرمایهگذاران خرد تأیید کرد! 💸
نهادهای نظارتی سوئیس رسماً با راهاندازی اولین صندوق قابل معامله بورسی (ETF) اسپات بیتکوین برای سرمایهگذاران عادی موافقت کردن.
یعنی سرمایهگذارهای خرد میتونن بدون اینکه مستقیماً بیتکوین بخرن یا درگیر نگهداری و مدیریت کیف پول دیجیتال بشن، از طریق یک صندوق بورسی روی قیمت بیتکوین سرمایهگذاری کنن.
چنین اتفاقی میتونه دسترسی سرمایهگذارهای سنتی …
❗️ نتیجه لایو ترید:
طلا دو معامله یکی RR2 داد و دومی که ریسک فری شده بوده اومد نقطه ورود و سر به سر بسته شد.
اتریوم دو معامله یکی RR2 داد.
نقره یه معامله که با ریسک نیم درصد استاپ خورد.
📌 در مجموع تا اینجا با احتساب ریسک نیم درصد 1.5 درصد سود گرفتیم.
🌟 2X Club | Trade Together
⚫️@sarmayedigital
❗️بازی GTA 6 ممکنه فقط توی یک روز، یک میلیارد دلار به اقتصاد آمریکا ضرر بزنه ❗️
طبق پیشبینیها، با انتشار بازی GTA 6 ممکنه تا ۱.۵ میلیون آمریکایی فقط برای اینکه بتونن این بازی رو تجربه کنن، یک روز از محل کارشون مرخصی بگیرن!
تخمین زده میشه این حجم از مرخصی گرفتن، در یک روز حدود یک میلیارد دلار هزینه اقتصادی برای آمریکا داشته باشه.
👀 یعنی GTA 6 اونقدر مورد انتظاره که حتی ممکنه روی بهرهوری اقتصاد آمریکا هم تأثیر بذ…
📈 بلکراک به دنبال وارد کردن داراییهای توکنیزهشده به سیستم بانکی سنتی! 📈
شرکت بلکراک (BlackRock)، یکی از بزرگترین شرکتهای مدیریت دارایی جهان، داره تلاش میکنه تا داراییهای توکنیزهشده (Tokenized Assets) رو وارد زیرساختهای بانکی و سیستم مالی سنتی کنه.
یعنی داراییهایی مثل سهام، اوراق قرضه و سایر ابزارهای مالی میتونن به شکل توکن روی بلاکچین عرضه و منتقل بشن.
❗️ این فناوری میتونه انتقال مالکیت داراییها رو س…
❗️اظهارات مدیرعامل تتر درباره کاهش ۹۴ درصدی حجم معاملات استیبلکوینهای مرتبط با ایران ❗️
مدیرعامل شرکت تتر، Paolo Ardoino، اعلام کرده که اقدامات این شرکت باعث شده حجم معاملات استیبلکوینهای مرتبط با ایران ۹۴ درصد کاهش پیدا کنه!
میگه اقداماتی که تتر انجام داده، فعالیتهای مرتبط با ایران در حوزه استیبلکوینها رو بهشدت محدود کرده.
البته این عدد به معنی کاهش ۹۴ درصدی کل معاملات ارز دیجیتال در ایران نیست؛ بلکه به حج…
Showing the 12 most recent of 952 posts we hold for @sarmayedigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sarmayedigital edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نبه نظرتون بیتکوین کف خودش رو روی ۵۸ هزار دلار ساخته یا هنوز ریزش بیشتری در راهه؟
📈 کف بیتکوین ساخته شده؛ از اینجا به بعد صعودی27%
❗️یه اصلاح دیگه داریم، ولی زیر ۵۸ هزار نمیریم29%
📉 هنوز کف اصلی رو ندیدیم؛ ریزش بیشتری در راهه27%
👀 فعلاً بازار غیرقابل پیشبینیه؛ منتظر تأییدم21%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
حالا به نظرتون چارت میتونه قبل از وقوع اتفاقات، یه نشونهای از چیزی که قراره اتفاق بیفته بهمون بده؟
✅ آره، قیمت زودتر از خبرها واکنش نشون میده62%
🎲 گاهی اتفاقیه؛ هر صعود و نزولی به معنی پیشبینی خبر نیست10%
🧠 ترکیبی از تحلیل تکنیکال و جریان اطلاعاته24%
❌ نه، چارت نمیتونه اتفاقات آینده رو پیشبینی کنه13%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
شما مشکل اصلیتون که بیشتر از همه اذیتتون میکنه، چیه؟
اینترنت.25%
سرمایه کم.54%
نبود صرافی معتبری که بدون ریسک، به ایرانی ها خدمات بده.25%
ریسک پذیری کم با توجه به وضعیت بد اقتصادی.32%
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
کف بیتکوین شکل گرفته و قیمت از این پایینتر نمیاد.14%
نه هنوز جا داریم برای ریزش بیشتر.69%
نمیدانم، اطلاعی ندارم.18%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 952 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sarmayedigital named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sarmayedigitala named in 1 post, 17 October 2026 – 17 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
سرمایه از ما، ترید از شما | SDF @SDF_fund · 24,904#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سرمایه از ما، ترید از شما | SDF @SDF_fund · 24,904 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 9 September 2026
تترا |نرخ لحظهای @tethera_io · 47,864 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
آریا👈دلار،طلا،اقتصادی @ariatraderofficial · 20,453 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
Eco_ramzali @ramzali_eco · 69,436 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Mohammad Hoseini @hoseinifinance_com · 30,058 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
جریانِ اقتصاد @jaryane_eghtesad · 49,055 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
امیر رمزعلی ( بازارهای مالی ) @ramzali_sc · 123,157 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
EcoKhavand | اکوخاوند @eco_khavand · 119,083 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
نقدکس | Naghdex @naghdexx · 71,702 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
آرش کهنگی/ ارزدیجیتال @kahangi_arash1 · 84,614 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
پلتفرم اکوکوچ | EcoCoach @ecocoach_net · 23,572 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
علی اوشانی | alioshani @alioshani · 35,458 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Maedetech | برنامه نویسی | هوش مصنوعی @maedetech · 35,406 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
Amir_ramzali @amir_ramzali · 121,497 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Dr.Mohamad.Heshmati @heshmati_finance · 26,039 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
BITFA ™️| بیتفا @bitfa · 223,125 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
کافه ترید news @maryam_cafetrade · 38,752 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 August 2026
Alireza Mehrabi @alirezamehrabi_com · 114,887 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
رویال کلاب کریپتو @cryptoclub_724 · 33,724 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Daraei360 تحلیل اقتصاد @doctordaraei · 34,715 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Soroosh School @sorooshschools · 36,397 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
Alireza Kaleji @alirezakalejii · 153,759 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Holders_News @Holders_News · 48 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
BitDate @BitDate · 35 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سرمایه دیجیتال | Sarmaye Digital” (@sarmayedigital), 71,670 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarmayedigital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.