Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Solitaire♦️

Channel

Solitaire♦️

@TheSolitairePrestige

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,515subscribers

-124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001763658798
TypeChannel
Username@TheSolitairePrestige
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheSolitairePrestige

Growth

9,5159,6399,5777 August 2026 — 9,639 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,639 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,638 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,637 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,622 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,566 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,559 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,547 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,568 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,553 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,546 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,527 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,515 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 32 days, net -124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,496–9,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 05:389,515-12
2 Sept 2026, 21:569,527-19
31 Aug 2026, 02:279,546-7
27 Aug 2026, 17:459,553-15
24 Aug 2026, 18:239,568+21
21 Aug 2026, 06:389,547-12
18 Aug 2026, 10:439,559-7
15 Aug 2026, 18:279,566-56
12 Aug 2026, 17:479,622-15
9 Aug 2026, 23:349,637-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:389,638-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:009,639no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:489,639first reading

Engagement

264 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.55%
avg views ÷ 9,515 subscribers
Avg views / post
528
229 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
230
of 264 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held264 (5 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total121,016
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC158 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Over 40x from my thesis on Saturn in less than 6 hours. Everything I mention becomes a major hit.

28 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC461 viewsread 29 August 2026

BonkGuy also confirms the bull run will be on BNBChain. 🐂 https://x.com/crypt_omar/status/2093419597441757418

28 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC609 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is priceless and it’s not so easy to accumulate $BTC at this price for some people. $PRICELESS solves that problem, Hold a meme and earn Bitcoin while sleeping. This is the retail onboarding coin of this bull run. 🐂 0x7d3b5e20210a4a4a70de8252337992d7ad2d7777

28 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC532 viewsread 29 August 2026

Bagworkers support bagworkers, That’s how we gonna make it in 2026. #Priceless szn.

28 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC506 viewsread 29 August 2026

Pumped notEzzy’s chart. 📈 In return he’s going to ape a bag in $PRICELESS and support. https://x.com/crypt_omar/status/2093317757391741365

Showing the 12 most recent of 264 posts we hold for @TheSolitairePrestige. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Koba's Calls
@kobascalls · 33,983
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
CaesarsCalls
@Caesars_Calls · 39,614
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 82,866
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
⚡️Мини Дуров
@MiniDurovv · 129,708
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
Gems Mine
@MineGems · 32,824
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
CryptoHylos 🍀 - Official
@CryptoHylos · 1,654,280
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
Святослав Гусев
@gusevself · 64,212
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
Благовещенск №1
@amurblg1 · 45,242
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
تترا |نرخ لحظه‌ای
@tethera_io · 53,265
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
🔞WJCASINO.BET.BR | Canal Oficial ®
@jogoWJ · 71,192
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026
Лёгкая йога
@anyclass_bodymind · 170,286
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 12 August 2026
سرمایه دیجیتال | Sarmaye Digital
@sarmayedigital · 29,315
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Москва 24/7
@msk7days · 2,207,827
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
Bruisers Calls
@bruiserscalls · 34,126
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Solitaire♦️” (@TheSolitairePrestige), 9,515 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheSolitairePrestige.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.