Achievement Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @BullishCallsPremium made a x2+ call on Bogdanoff. $82K ➡️ $167K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts

Channel
SpyDefi
@spydefi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
42,610subscribers
+725 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001960616143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spydefi |
| Description | Welcome to the home of KOL analytics. Buy-Bot: @SpyDefiBuyBot Main bot: @Spydefi_bot SpyDefi Support: @SpyDefiHelpBot Marketing/Admin: @spydefi_admin Powered by @Mobula |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spydefi |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 42,610 | -14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 42,624 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 42,630 | +15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 42,615 | +45 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 42,570 | +30 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 42,540 | +129 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 42,411 | +11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 42,400 | +56 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 42,344 | +21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 42,323 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 42,327 | +26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 42,301 | +56 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 42,245 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 42,250 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 42,237 | +29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 42,208 | +73 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 42,135 | +21 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 42,114 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 42,125 | +33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 42,092 | first reading |
Engagement
1,660 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.339%
- avg views ÷ 42,610 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 144
- 1,020 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1,020
- of 1,660 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,660 (6 August 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 147,120 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 23:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2
- Videos
- ≈1,200
- Links
- ≈251,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Achievement Unlocked: x5! 👋 @Vortex_Gamble made a x5+ call on WangChai. $285K ➡️ $1.5M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔹 USDC - TRENDING #1
Achievement Unlocked: Back with a bang! 💥 After a few days of no calls, @ChadSpace made a x2+ call on WangChai. $666K ➡️ $1.5M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔸 PAID - TRENDING #2
Achievement Unlocked: Back In Town 🤠 @ChadSpace made a x2+ call for WangChai on BSC after a time away from the chain. $666K ➡️ $1.5M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔸 TIPPED - TRENDING #1
Achievement Unlocked: Conviction! 👩🎓 @ChadSpace had the conviction to call WangChai at a higher marketcap and it just hit x2+. $666K ➡️ $1.5M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts
RECENTLY CALLED PROJECTS 🕗 LAST HOUR: 👑 NetStrat | 3 2️⃣ Granular | 3 3️⃣ fomo pay | 1 4️⃣ Black Box | 1 5️⃣ NEET | 1 🗓 LAST 24 HOURS: 👑 GGWP | 18 2️⃣ Argus Cat | 11 3️⃣ Rentnode | 10 4️⃣ Uranus | 9 5️⃣ ADODO | 9 📣 Click the numbers to view which KOLs called the project and when 🔊Ad - Spy Defi Want your ad here? Contact @spydefi_admin
Achievement Unlocked: Conviction! 👩🎓 @GemsofRa had the conviction to call Fuse at a higher marketcap and it just hit x2+. $653K ➡️ $1.3M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts
Achievement Unlocked: Back In Town 🤠 @GemsofRa made a x2+ call for Fuse on ETH after a time away from the chain. $653K ➡️ $1.3M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🟣 $牛马 - TRENDING #2
Achievement Unlocked: x6! ⚡️ @SagatCalls made a x6+ call on Flork. $69K ➡️ $418K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🟣 CNPY - TRENDING #1
Achievement Unlocked: x5! 👋 @marucallss made a x5+ call on Flork. $75K ➡️ $418K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts
Achievement Unlocked: x6! ⚡️ @BullishCallsPremium made a x6+ call on Jean Philandog. $35K ➡️ $220K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🪶 ROBIN - TRENDING #2
Achievement Unlocked: x4! 🖖 @BullishCallsPremium made a x4+ call on Jean Philandog. $35K ➡️ $147K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 😎 NEW: SpyDefi LIVE - FREE real-time feed of call alerts
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,660 posts we hold for @spydefi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 733 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@marine_CryptoCalls · 72,30649 postsMiniDraft Calls
@minidraftcalls · 70,83249 postsMagic🎲gamble
@traders_gamble · 13,44547 postsMaestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 36,17842 postsDefiApeCalls ☎️
@DefiApeGems · 46,50241 postsReaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 15,37439 postsManiac Degen Apes
@maniacapes · 10,19437 posts𝙱𝙸𝙶 𝙶𝙴𝙼𝚂 𝙾𝙵𝙵𝙸𝙲𝙸𝙰𝙻
@biggemsofficial · 99,54335 postsQUEENVLAD CRYPTO GAMBLES X1000
@QUEENVLAD · 11,16835 posts🏹 BGBCN 🏹 #sᴏʟ | #ᴇᴛʜ | #ʙᴀsᴇ | #ʙsᴄ
@bgbcncall · 36,32932 posts⛩️ EDEN 阿尔法 策略 🐂
@edenalphaplays · 110,81732 posts🇨🇳币道 BiDao 🟢ETH/BSC/SOL/BASE @BiDaoBi 📞🎙
@BiDaoPD · 16,91730 postsBrodyCalls 📣💎
@BrodyCalls · 16,03730 postsDegen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,27126 postsRyoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,00326 posts小胖交易中心(Dwen Marketing)
@Dwen_Exchange · 34,88524 postsMeta caller
@metacaller · 42,51324 posts🤜BROTHERS CHANNEL🤛
@BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1 · 15,00323 postsMagic calls🔮
@magical_journal · 16,07223 postsCall of Midas
@CallOfMidas · 14,02822 postsBadass Alpha Calls®️
@badassAlphaCalls · 29,44621 postsCowboy’s Alpha👑
@Cryptocowboyx · 17,34121 postsMarcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,69521 postsMeta Gambler
@MetaGambler · 23,46721 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BullishCallsPremium · 17,346220 postsSolHouse Signal
@solhousesignal · 16,773137 postsSpyDefi Live
@SpyDefiLive · 896112 postsRobin the Frog
@robincoinrbh · 2,18768 posts$SWAPPY Portal
@swappyportal · 1,25756 postsChump Coin Official Announcement Channel
@CHUMPCOIN21B · 4,34455 postsDegeneracy By BuLL
@Begeneracy · 6,71830 postsHUNTER GEM ON SOLANA, BASE, ETH
@memelottery2024 · 4,23822 postsAdam's Crypto Playground
@AdamsCryptoPlayground · 7,60521 postsDoge-1 Announcement Channel
@Doge1onRH · 42118 postsGubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,90016 postsSignal calls
@SIGNALCALLS · 35,43215 postsCRYPTO BOSS CALL'S Gamble🎲
@CryptoBossGamble · 5,04914 posts🇨🇳币道 BiDao 🟢ETH/BSC/SOL/BASE @BiDaoBi 📞🎙
@BiDaoPD · 16,91713 postsGod Candle Trades
@capitalcartelofficial · 3,19813 postsCryptsy’s Journal
@cryptsycalls · 2,43213 postsMJ’s Shitcoin Neverland 🏰
@ShitcoinNeverland · 4,26212 postsBags Casino 🎒🎒🎒🎲
@bagscasino · 4,16411 postsDegen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,27111 postsMarcolino’s Casino🎰
@mrboocalls · 3,53711 postsCryptoLord 🎲
@CryptoLord100xCalls · 8,33410 postsItachi Degen Calls
@ItachiDegenCalls · 2,33610 postsZAYDAN GEMS AND GAINS
@Zaydan_Gems · 4,63610 postsLeo Club
@LeoClub69 · 5,7979 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@spydefi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MaestroBotsHub · 167,518
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 188,745
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@trendingssol · 139,004
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@Crypto_KingCall · 96,765
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@LaunchInt · 56,631
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
@cryptocurrency_media · 62,113
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@bitcoin_price · 56,324
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@memetakeovers · 70,002
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@arcanegems · 47,229
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@ETHTRENDING · 43,836
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@trending · 477,918
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 August 2026
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@lowtaxsolana · 42,531
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
@lowtaxbsc · 40,617
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 112,593
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,542
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@WatcherGuru · 627,715
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SpyDefi” (@spydefi), 42,610 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spydefi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.