Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maestros Gamble Degen Apes

Channel

Maestros Gamble Degen Apes

@Maestrosdegen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,178subscribers

-1,059 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810124798
TypeChannel
Username@Maestrosdegen
DescriptionNothing in this channel is financial advice Always DYOR @CrypticMaestro Disclaimer: https://t.me/Maestrosdegen/5
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Maestrosdegen

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,17837,23736,707.57 August 2026 — 37,237 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,236 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,194 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,174 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,139 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,091 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,013 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,968 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,928 subscribers15 August 2026 — 36,903 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,798 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,743 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,735 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,731 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,704 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,684 subscribers23 August 2026 — 36,650 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,653 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,624 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,620 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,590 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,557 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,502 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,446 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,415 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,384 subscribers3 September 2026 — 36,375 subscribers4 September 2026 — 36,357 subscribers7 September 2026 — 36,329 subscribers10 September 2026 — 36,292 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36,249 subscribers14 September 2026 — 36,229 subscribers16 September 2026 — 36,207 subscribers18 September 2026 — 36,178 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,059. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,019–37,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:1936,178-29
16 Sept 2026, 01:2036,207-22
14 Sept 2026, 06:3736,229-20
12 Sept 2026, 12:5736,249-43
10 Sept 2026, 08:4236,292-37
7 Sept 2026, 04:2136,329-28
4 Sept 2026, 10:2136,357-18
3 Sept 2026, 01:5536,375-9
1 Sept 2026, 20:5636,384-31
1 Sept 2026, 00:1836,415-31
31 Aug 2026, 00:1436,446-56
29 Aug 2026, 22:5836,502-55
29 Aug 2026, 02:0836,557-33
28 Aug 2026, 02:2836,590-30
26 Aug 2026, 23:1836,620-4
26 Aug 2026, 01:1436,624-29
25 Aug 2026, 01:4336,653+3
23 Aug 2026, 14:1736,650-34
21 Aug 2026, 23:2736,684-20
20 Aug 2026, 18:2236,704first reading

Engagement

982 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.52%
avg views ÷ 36,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
551
482 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
482
of 982 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held982 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total265,716
Reactions total4,997
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,770
Videos
≈60
Links
≈2,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,856 reactions across 982 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,58226.2%
🔥2,07421.0%
👍1,93819.7%
🤝1,63716.6%
⚡1,62516.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 982 of the 982 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,856 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 982 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.102%
1 of 982 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
485
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
516
over 981 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
ianprivacy125 September 202625 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 982 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 02:56 UTC344 views7 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

$sfx 2x + 1.4Mill mc at ATH 🔥

❤3🤝2👍1🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 00:15 UTC485 views10 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Advertisementerid ianprivacyPhoto

BSC Meridian Privacy just launched Meridian Privacy is a shielded wallet built on Binance Smart Chain. It lets you create a private wallet with a 12-word phrase, deposit funds into a shielded pool, and send or withdraw without linking your activity. True ownership. Zero surveillance. 0x7a67363885EBC01F1D2AEf95B238E39ca1587777 https://meridianprivacy.com/ https://t.me/meridianprivacy https://x.com/meridianprivacy…

🔥4⚡2❤2👍1🤝1

24 Sept 2026, 22:12 UTC501 views10 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Heard the team has locked in some major partnerships for $BOTIFY Looking great here https://dexscreener.com/solana/giuuw16z9z9xv4cbtwpn3xislyhqlsgkzgpij82gklm9

❤5🔥2⚡1👍1🤝1

24 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTC584 views12 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

$PENPE 34x 3.4Mill mc 💪

❤5⚡2👍2🔥2🤝1

24 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC549 views12 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

$sfx 2x + 1.4Mill mc at ATH 🔥

❤4🔥3🤝3⚡1👍1

24 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC539 views13 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

$Ginnan 2x low cap moving well

❤5👍3⚡2🤝2🔥1

24 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC506 views9 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

$LENNY reversing off bottom after a 8x + 240k mc run at launch

❤4⚡3👍1🔥1

24 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC498 views9 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Fun fact that $FLOKI ran from 2M market cap to 100M+ in September to October in 2021 then violently to billions shortly after Once the run starts, it moves very fast. We are in September , stars aligned.

🤝3⚡2❤2👍2

24 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC538 views12 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

ARCAT FAIR LAUNCH THIS WEEK team with some solid previous projects! Artificial Cat is coming to take the throne Arcat will have day 1 support from the biggest launchpad on Arc and have a big kol selection. Join their socials and wait for more info. X - https://x.com/officialarcat?s=11 Web - Arcat.app TG - @officialarcat Disclaimer

⚡3❤3🔥3👍2🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 982 posts we hold for @Maestrosdegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Maestrosdegen edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777
#1
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
#2
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
#3
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
#4
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,271
#5
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
#6
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 16,074
#7
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,493
#8
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 15,286
#9
Shyroshi Gambles
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 18,368
#10
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,703
#11
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,900
#12
CarnageCalls Gambles
@CarnagecallsGambles · 6,632
#13
The Don’s Degens
@degensgems · 15,169
#14
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,853
#15
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,984
#16
Neo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,486
#17
Whale Wallet Watchers
@WhaleWalletWatchers · 7,932
#18
Ev's Alphas
@HardSnipe · 11,883
#19
Chigga's Gambles 赌博日记
@chiggajogambles · 8,767
#20
1000𝕏 Multi Chain
@MultiChain1000x · 9,497
#21
The Blockchain God's Gambles
@TBGgambLes · 5,480
#22
The Casino
@thecasinoeye · 6,380
#23
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,708
#24
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 59,801
#25
Crafty Gambles
@CraftyGambles · 10,347
#26
Dream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 10,755
#27
KOBE'S CALLS
@KobesCalls · 17,946
#28
💰ANIME GEMS💰
@AnimeGems · 9,693
#29
Gabbens Calls - Multichain
@GabbensCalls · 10,806
#30
THE EYE 👀
@eyecrosschain · 12,185
#31
FRENS GEMS 💎
@FrenzGems · 5,092
#32
KOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 15,124
#33
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,790
#34
Astral’s Gambles 🎲 (DEGEN-ARC)
@ASTRAL_GAMBLES · 3,340
#35
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 41,000
#36
The Don's Calls
@TheDonsCalls · 12,917
#37
Hodlers Gambles
@famedegens · 2,422
#38
- BSC -
@lowtaxbsc · 40,617
#39
BEAST MODE APE REVIEWS! DYOR NFA!
@beastmodeapecalls · 6,007
#40
Faded Crypto ARC
@fadedarc · 5,220
#41
Vendetta Gamble
@vendettagamble · 6,819
#42
Dr. Crypto Calls ❁
@dr_crypto_channel · 18,101
#43
Gems Mine(Gamble)
@GemsmineEth · 5,486
#44
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 47,229
#45
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,715
#46
666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,742
#47
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,747
#48
@TRENDING (ETH / SOL)
@trending · 477,918
#49
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890
#50
GENESIS CHAIN CALLS
@GenesisChain_Calls · 15,007
#51
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 19,141
#52
Spaceman Callz Solana
@spacemancallzsolana · 8,794
#53
Sapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,429
#54
Archerr's GAMBLE 🎲
@Archerrgambles · 5,716
#55
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,372
#56
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,742
#57
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 53,804
#58
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,542
#59
🔱 N0 FXCKS GIVEN GAMBLES
@NFG_GAMBLES · 4,324
#60
Dizzy Whale Calls
@DizzyWhaleCalls · 6,491
#61
Doxxed GEM Club 宝藏频道💎
@DoxxedChannel · 17,230
#62
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,695
#63
Levi's Gem Calls
@LevisGemCalls · 13,688
#64
Luigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls
@luigiscalls · 8,366
#65
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
#66
- SOL -
@lowtaxsolana · 42,531
#67
Long House
@xraygambles · 11,962
#68
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,416
#69
🤜BROTHERS CHANNEL🤛
@BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1 · 15,064
#70
Julz Labs 🧪
@JulzLabs · 4,773
#71
The Caller
@thecallercrosschain · 7,584
#72
Call Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 26,000
#73
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,968
#74
G's Journal
@GodsCryptoReviews · 11,142
#75
Achilles' Gambles
@AchillesGambles · 6,573
#76
Waldo’s Alpha Plays 💀
@waldosalpha · 5,043
#77
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,315
#78

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Gems 🚀📈🌟
@cryptogems555 · 24,183
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Gogeta Crypto Chad$
@gogetacalls · 59,041
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
BATMAN GEMS 🦇
@batman_gem · 22,484
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,271
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Crypto King Call
@Crypto_KingCall · 96,765
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Veigar Calls
@veigarcalls · 25,048
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,708
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
EZ Money’s Gems 💎
@EZMoneyCalls · 25,916
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 90,836
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Dr. Crypto Calls ❁
@dr_crypto_channel · 18,101
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,900
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Meta caller
@metacaller · 42,513
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 167,518
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 188,094
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Koba's Calls
@kobascalls · 32,020
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Blessed labs 𓃵
@Blessedmemecalls · 24,661
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,703
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
- BSC -
@lowtaxbsc · 40,617
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 85,334
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 89 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maestros Gamble Degen Apes” (@Maestrosdegen), 36,178 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Maestrosdegen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.