🔅$GROK +1 call at $194K mc : ├KOL: Carnagecalls 👑 | CPW: 543/1000 ├Total calls: 3 ♻️Stats 6onu5YwrVVDLyBRaqgppGep36bjYaBAR2gQkJe5Jpump 🎯Score: 34/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here

Channel
Call Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,970subscribers
+443 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002050218130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CallAnalyserSol |
| Description | All channels: https://t.me/addlist/rV1KJiyIYTdkMTM1 Bot: @TokenPingBot | @CallAnalyserBot Listing: @tomriddle010 | Owner: @basedev0x Calls from qualified channels only. NFA & DYOR. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CallAnalyserSol |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:54 | 25,970 | -83 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 26,053 | +53 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 26,000 | -24 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 26,024 | +32 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 25,992 | +19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 25,973 | -29 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 26,002 | -40 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 26,042 | -51 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 26,093 | +35 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:26 | 26,058 | +62 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:03 | 25,996 | +227 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 25,769 | +46 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 25,723 | +97 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 25,626 | +46 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 25,580 | +61 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 25,519 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 25,522 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 25,524 | +32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 25,492 | +43 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 25,449 | first reading |
Engagement
1,538 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.135%
- avg views ÷ 25,970 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 35.1
- 420 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 420
- of 1,538 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 420 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,538 (6 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 14,724 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 20:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈282
- Videos
- ≈37
- Links
- ≈116,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 85.0% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔅$GROK +1 call at $194K mc : ├KOL: CarnageCalls Gambles | CPW: 539/1000 ├Total calls: 2 ♻️Stats 6onu5YwrVVDLyBRaqgppGep36bjYaBAR2gQkJe5Jpump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$darwin +1 call at $630K mc : ├KOL: Mrpunk Cooks | CPW: 636/1000 ├♻️Stats 5VnbrKp28Qs9CAH6PyZdxBNvLxZcbeX3YBsozgWnpump 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$FUD +1 call at $68K mc : ├KOL: Mrpunk Cooks | CPW: 636/1000 ├♻️Stats 52jE5rFRmQYTwQJk9TNZc1c6S1EU6refuNyLNhXEqUeW 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$SAGENT +1 call at $42K mc : ├KOL: Gay calls only, buy if ur gay. | CPW: 574/1000 ├♻️Stats 54959gzAsWpmoVw1wbpqiU8xj5JJuEzcKMGb7aEhpump 🎯Score: 32/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$AUTON +1 call at $108K mc : ├KOL: Moon or Rekt | CPW: 454/1000 ├♻️Stats 39ahtL8ynzE4amH26J29C93PA5172V3ft9UuUcqQS8fz 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$PLAGUE +1 call at $1M mc : ├KOL: Carnagecalls 👑 | CPW: 544/1000 ├Total calls: 6 ♻️Stats CscZaq5twomhUkvCY8Jdd1tge32L4Yj9FbkFFEZQpump 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$PLAGUE +1 call at $1M mc : ├KOL: CarnageCalls Gambles | CPW: 539/1000 ├Total calls: 5 ♻️Stats CscZaq5twomhUkvCY8Jdd1tge32L4Yj9FbkFFEZQpump 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$phubber +1 call at $814K mc : ├KOL: BrodyCalls 📣💎 | CPW: 553/1000 ├Total calls: 6 ♻️Stats CBcjQNdtgb4SHwKDqKFxD3yPSk7pEMpKHQiMmZrgpump 🎯Score: 62/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
🔅$GROK +1 call at $128K mc : ├KOL: Luigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls | CPW: 289/1000 ├♻️Stats 6onu5YwrVVDLyBRaqgppGep36bjYaBAR2gQkJe5Jpump 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$CRAWL +1 call at $4M mc : ├KOL: Clasier Calls 🇺🇸 | CPW: 582/1000 ├Total calls: 2 ♻️Stats BXoHJddsWJLHtAopeiSbKUSELsu8hSFMs8baGMDkpump 🎯Score: 60/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ ⭐️How to trade on #ROBINHOOD chain 👉 here ⭐️
🔅$GoonCat +1 call at $19K mc : ├KOL: Fay Call | CPW: 409/1000 ├♻️Stats BhqvRgP5hGnQaqQtNnynBfdEy4X4aHznWLGSmuyunMDf 🎯Score: 31/100 🎯BUY: GMGN☆STB☆Trojan☆Axiom☆Maestro 🎯Scan: DexS | KOL Trending | PIRB Scan ➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖️➖ 🏹 Robinhood calls only: here
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,538 posts we hold for @CallAnalyserSol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CallAnalyser · 49,4851,332 postsCall Analyser 2
@CallAnalyser2 · 11,780192 postsAnalyser
@analysersol · 120 postsRasaringen
@rasaringan · 220 postsCall Analyser (Only Solana)
@CallAnalyser1 · 2935 postsCrypto Degen
@Cr7ptoDegenChannel · 311 postPresent Calls - Lottery 🫰
@presentcallskl · 71 postDEX calls test
@slezisatos · 11 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@CallAnalyser · 49,4851,538 postsCall Analyser Announcement
@CallAnalyserPortal · 8,0961,538 postsPIRBView
@coinscan · 37,8481,538 postsMaestro
@maestro · 47,5581,538 postsTrojan on Solana
@solana_trojanbot · 49,1911,538 postsKOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 15,0861,538 postsWhale Coin Talk Gambles
@WCTCalls · 5,633469 postsLuigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls
@luigiscalls · 8,33460 postsSpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,80938 postspapi prayground
@papicall · 2,12037 postsCarnageCalls Gambles
@CarnagecallsGambles · 6,59333 postsUnc Coco Journal
@crypt0coc0 · 7,11232 posts🧳💰Nom’s Trade Journal💰🧳
@nomsgems · 5,25731 postsManiac Degen Apes
@maniacapes · 10,89628 postsGay calls only, buy if ur gay.
@wifechangingcallss · 6,23126 postsLiam's gems calls
@LiamsGemCalls · 21,41625 posts🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 87,86225 postsDegen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,18223 postsGubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,92122 postsMadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 81,12421 postsMoon or Rekt
@MoonOrRektJourney · 1,75821 postsMrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,03020 postsBrodyCalls 📣💎
@BrodyCalls · 15,81819 postsDream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 11,32119 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@walloftrophies · 15,086#1
@CallAnalyserTRX · 4,193#2
@x666calls · 17,751#3
@CallAnalyserEth · 4,819#4
@CallAnalyserPortal · 8,096#5
@CallAnalyserTON · 5,152#6
@CallAnalyserBase · 5,197#7
@PopchiCalls · 1,255#8
@Insider_ECA · 5,805#9
@Jeetycallss · 3,984#10
@rosecrypto96 · 766#11
@mad_apes_gambles · 101,513#12
@PowsGemCalls · 112,332#13
@MarkDegens · 23,599#14
@Maestrosdegen · 35,983#15
@mad_apes_call · 81,124#16
@DegenSeals · 34,182#17
@pumpdotfunalert · 16,121#18
@solvolumealert · 11,506#19
@xraygambles · 11,805#20
@DizzyWhaleCalls · 6,642#21
@TBGgambLes · 5,538#22
@watisdes · 30,149#23
@BatmanGem · 10#24
@TheReaperGems · 15,153#25
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,030#26
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,039#27
@aliceandrave · 1,432#28
@crypt0coc0 · 7,112#29
@WhaleWalletWatchers · 7,896#30
@trending · 471,605#31
@BrainstormAlphas · 6,297#32
@GenesisChain_Calls · 14,569#33
@primegems · 18,976#34
@bagcalls · 57,084#35
@sugarydick · 33,529#36
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,950#37
@maythousdegens · 15,456#38
@JulzLabs · 4,712#39
@CarnagecallsGambles · 6,593#40
@TheIllestShills · 4,791#41
@gubbinscalls · 25,921#42
@DreamCalls100x · 11,321#43
@PhanesTrending · 6,038#44
@NeoCallss · 17,571#45
@FrenzGems · 5,091#46
@DeezeSignal · 3,706#47
@insydercasino · 13,747#48
@dexscreener_trendings · 18,703#49
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,288#50
@degensgems · 15,085#51
@GoodPlays · 1,421#52
@sadcatgamble · 27,878#53
@brozinkers · 53,466#54
@eyecrosschain · 12,206#55
@NiksGambles · 4,696#56
@rollingapes_calls · 3,287#57
@Archerrgambles · 5,700#58
@arcanegems · 47,159#59
@findertrending · 26,975#60
@ryoshigamble · 37,428#61
@WatcherGuru · 628,853#62
@HardSnipe · 11,817#63
@plays · 7,415#64
@printspress · 19,050#65
@TERPS_X100_CALLS · 3,244#66
@buythedipcall · 1,693#67
@maythouscalls · 35,638#68
@kobesgambles · 15,981#69
@MultiChain1000x · 9,482#70
@GabbensCalls · 10,864#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SolTradingBot_Channel · 20,568
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 September 2026
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 186,973
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@solsafesniper · 18,990
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 October 2026
@MarkDegens · 23,599
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
@brookcalls · 31,134
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@memetakeovers · 68,284
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@mad_apes_gambles · 101,513
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@MaybachCalls · 28,381
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@Zelfiguru_blog_eng · 24,840
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
@PhanesHub · 47,379
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@LaunchInt · 55,062
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 110,741
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@findertrending · 26,975
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
@trendingssol · 136,961
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@DegenSeals · 34,182
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@Maestrosdegen · 35,983
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@bagcalls · 57,084
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@batman_gem · 20,932
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
@MaestroBotsHub · 165,748
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Call Analyser (SOL Only)” (@CallAnalyserSol), 25,970 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CallAnalyserSol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.