Bought more $CETS take us back to 20M thx

Channel
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
56,969subscribers
-2,738 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001225991487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bagcalls |
| Description | The OG of OGs. X: https://x.com/Bagcalls TG: @bitbaggerr DOUBLE TRIPLE CHECK Main - @Bagcalls Gambles - @Bagscasino 1win.com-bagcalls.com (VIP available) BD: @Humanjoe |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bagcalls |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 56,969 | -1,208 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 58,177 | +1,050 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 57,127 | -2,183 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 59,310 | +1,234 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 58,076 | -948 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 59,024 | -1,319 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 60,343 | +3,597 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 56,746 | -343 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 57,089 | -1,240 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 58,329 | -1,175 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 59,504 | -439 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 59,943 | +4,199 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 55,744 | -2,466 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 58,210 | -2,283 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 60,493 | +1,973 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 58,520 | -624 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 59,144 | -1,049 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 60,193 | +2,455 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 57,738 | -2,473 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 60,211 | first reading |
Engagement
325 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.06%
- avg views ÷ 56,969 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,740
- 242 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 243
- of 325 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 325 (4 August 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 422,089 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,940
- Videos
- ≈1,100
- Links
- ≈20,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Texas stand up Garcia stand stand up
https://x.com/BagCalls/status/2098857601945530420 WOW fans rejoice
https://x.com/gomodotbot/status/2098833145156215012
$GOMO 8x
Sent and entry
Trying $GOMO buys back and burns on trades it wins 0x32177902b044b4abe0bc9633ccf15758ad844d0b
3x $SWARM
5x on $TACZ $SWARMBOARD coming up on 2x now
And adding $SWARMBOARD 0x462dff4be800c77a61e69dc2ea6010e4237f674d
Also tried $TACZ at 200k with ZCAT rewards If they support cool 3nqHijNUExsnjNBb15WJsJ2xisyMVGN6FK4aUgZk1Rwj
0xe45034D0c4d0f25AeCf4C50b1B67077B23f11e18 This can send untul he says the name
Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @bagcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bagscasino · 3,18320 postsALL CALL CHANNELS
@allcallchannels · 32 postsTreasure Hoard Announcements
@TreasureHoardAnnouncements · 42 postsBitcoinEthereumTetherXRPCardanoDogeCoinSolanaTron - $BIGCOIN
@BigcoinERC20 · 91 postCHEDDAR BOB 100X CALLS
@CHEDDARBOBCALLS · 11 postElon's 420 Calls
@Elons420calls · 11 postGEMS LORD
@gemslordcom · 21 postG O R O N
@GORON_erc20 · 251 postHoodie Cat
@HoodieCatCoin · 901 postInfluencer Post Alert [Free Version]
@InfluencerPostAlert · 3,4251 postPEPE CLASSIC
@PEPECLASSIC_ERC20 · 81 postPepe❤️PEPSI - $PEPSI
@PEPSI_erc20 · 171 postQuality Control
@QualityC0ntrol · 1231 postREFUND $RFD
@RFD_ERC20 · 761 postCalls baby
@skylarscalls · 761 postSGE NEWS
@sogefinancenews · 1331 postSAJA - spanish community
@tctspanish · 31 postTheCatWorld Official Announcement
@TheCatWorldAnn · 311 postThe Den
@TheSamuraiDen · 291 postᘔOGGEᗪ ᑭEᑭE ($ZEPE)
@ZEPE_erc20 · 151 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@iTokenLockedEthereum · 6,45918 posts@callers
@presales · 62618 postsiToken - Ethereum
@iTokenEthereum · 16,1358 postsCall Analyser
@CallAnalyser · 49,6046 postsiToken Verified - Ethereum
@iTokenVerifiedEthereum · 8635 postsФильтр
@asdfsdafa2 · 14 postsbooferyfloo
@booferyfloo · 13 postsjunction_output
@junctionoutput · 13 postsBags Casino 🎒🎒🎒🎲
@bagscasino · 3,1832 postsCall Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 25,9732 posts测试用转发
@ceshiyongzhuanfa · 12 postsjunction_output_birdman
@junctionoutputbirdman · 12 postsProtoVerse News
@News_PVR · 3532 postsVaultboy Degen Calls
@vaultboydegencalls · 602 postsKOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 15,1812 postsBest Accounts On Telegram
@BestAccountsOnTelegram · 3181 postBullish Trending Crypto
@BullishTrendingCrypto · 241 postCall Analyser (BASE only)
@CallAnalyserBase · 5,2251 postCall Analyser (ETH Only)
@CallAnalyserEth · 4,8391 postHappy Tracking
@happytracking · 1811 postHabibi Calls
@kakasworld · 51 postSpyDefi Live Premium - Hall of Fame
@SDLiveHallOfFame · 2821 postSpyDefi Hub
@SpyDefiHub · 1,3001 postThunders Marketing (Web3)🌛
@thundersmarketing · 8061 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@PowsGemCalls · 113,161#1
@x666calls · 17,761#2
@Maestrosdegen · 36,249#3
@ryoshigamble · 38,195#4
@mad_apes_call · 82,687#5
@maythouscalls · 35,788#6
@maythousdegens · 15,511#7
@senzu_calls · 6,808#8
@watisdes · 30,133#9
@venomcalls · 35,795#10
@printspress · 19,180#11
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,532#12
@houseofdegeneracy · 37,009#13
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,682#14
@DreamCalls100x · 10,732#15
@GemsofRa · 17,914#16
@CarnagecallsGambles · 6,670#17
@sugarydick · 33,840#18
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,906#19
@WhaleWalletWatchers · 7,957#20
@NeoCallss · 17,466#21
@AnimeGems · 9,764#22
@TBGgambLes · 5,472#23
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,917#24
@Archerrgambles · 5,727#25
@chiggajogambles · 8,779#26
@gubbinscalls · 25,905#27
@TheDonsCalls · 12,948#28
@senzugambles · 1,883#29
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 18,389#30
@ETHTRENDING · 44,089#31
@ASTRAL_GAMBLES · 3,350#32
@Acidonmeliketheraincalls · 3,379#33
@thecallercrosschain · 7,608#34
@walloftrophies · 15,181#35
@crypt0coc0 · 7,078#36
@thecasinoeye · 6,360#37
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,861#38
@eyecrosschain · 12,214#39
@lucasapeeth · 6,398#40
@TERPS_X100_CALLS · 3,268#41
@HardSnipe · 11,895#42
@brozinkers · 54,256#43
@primegems · 18,556#44
@eezzyjournal · 41,123#45
@cryptopunters · 2,265#46
@GabbensCalls · 10,782#47
@FrenzGems · 5,125#48
@BasedLaunches · 3,861#49
@TheBlockchainGods · 6,621#50
@mad_apes_gambles · 102,212#51
@arcanegems · 47,270#52
@DegenSeals · 34,329#53
@TheReaperGems · 16,866#54
@SapphireCalls · 12,481#55
@spydefi · 42,615#56
@TheIllestShills · 4,826#57
@kobesgambles · 16,108#58
@degensgems · 15,244#59
@diaryofapes · 4,679#60
@MarkDegens · 23,918#61
@WatcherGuru · 627,315#62
@kvontrades · 3,588#63
@Luffysgemcalls · 11,075#64
@spidersjournal · 33,009#65
@engineercalls · 7,209#66
@michacalls · 8,081#67
@JulzLabs · 4,778#68
@NFG_GAMBLES · 4,344#69
@trendingssol · 139,877#70
@CraftyGambles · 10,770#71
@MultiChain1000x · 9,474#72
@jamiescave · 13,518#73
@DoxxedChannel · 17,284#74
@CallAnalyserSol · 25,973#75
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,578#76
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,348#77
@GenesisChain_Calls · 15,153#78
@SHITTYCALLZBYPOE · 10,899#79
@KobesCalls · 18,050#80
@iTokenEthereum · 16,135#81
@waldosalpha · 5,060#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@brookcalls · 30,861
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@LionCALL · 90,911
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@MaybachCalls · 29,740
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@LionJUNGLE · 33,627
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
@mad_apes_call · 82,687
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@ETHTRENDING · 44,089
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@Maestrosdegen · 36,249
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@maythouscalls · 35,788
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@ryoshigamble · 38,195
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@CallAnalyserSol · 25,973
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
@dogendojo · 35,800
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@gogetacalls · 58,437
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
@venomcalls · 35,795
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@Crypto_KingCall · 101,618
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@trendingssol · 139,877
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@mad_apes_gambles · 102,212
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@ChinapumpWXC · 108,533
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@DegenSeals · 34,329
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@MineGems · 32,423
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@bruiserscalls · 33,670
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@Caesars_Calls · 39,502
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
@ethsafesniper · 27,130
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒” (@bagcalls), 56,969 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bagcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.