Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @callers

Channel

@callers

@presales

Not marked by Telegram, checked 14 August 20268 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

630subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002228250661
TypeChannel
Usernames@babydoge @crypt0 @cryptochannel @cryptomarketing @cryptotips @presales @reminder @techbot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/presales

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

625638631.56 August 2026 — 630 subscribers6 August 2026 — 630 subscribers6 August 2026 — 633 subscribers6 August 2026 — 634 subscribers6 August 2026 — 634 subscribers6 August 2026 — 634 subscribers6 August 2026 — 635 subscribers7 August 2026 — 638 subscribers7 August 2026 — 638 subscribers8 August 2026 — 638 subscribers10 August 2026 — 634 subscribers10 August 2026 — 634 subscribers13 August 2026 — 633 subscribers13 August 2026 — 633 subscribers14 August 2026 — 632 subscribers14 August 2026 — 632 subscribers17 August 2026 — 628 subscribers18 August 2026 — 628 subscribers18 August 2026 — 628 subscribers19 August 2026 — 628 subscribers20 August 2026 — 627 subscribers20 August 2026 — 628 subscribers21 August 2026 — 628 subscribers22 August 2026 — 628 subscribers24 August 2026 — 629 subscribers24 August 2026 — 627 subscribers25 August 2026 — 630 subscribers26 August 2026 — 630 subscribers27 August 2026 — 630 subscribers28 August 2026 — 631 subscribers28 August 2026 — 631 subscribers30 August 2026 — 632 subscribers31 August 2026 — 632 subscribers1 September 2026 — 632 subscribers1 September 2026 — 633 subscribers2 September 2026 — 633 subscribers3 September 2026 — 629 subscribers5 September 2026 — 630 subscribers9 September 2026 — 628 subscribers9 September 2026 — 628 subscribers10 September 2026 — 628 subscribers10 September 2026 — 627 subscribers10 September 2026 — 627 subscribers11 September 2026 — 627 subscribers12 September 2026 — 625 subscribers13 September 2026 — 626 subscribers17 September 2026 — 626 subscribers17 September 2026 — 627 subscribers17 September 2026 — 627 subscribers18 September 2026 — 631 subscribers19 September 2026 — 630 subscribers6306 August 202619 September 2026
51 measurements spanning 45 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 623–640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:58630-1
18 Sept 2026, 14:41631+4
17 Sept 2026, 23:57627no change
17 Sept 2026, 15:21627+1
17 Sept 2026, 10:38626no change
13 Sept 2026, 09:41626+1
12 Sept 2026, 15:38625-2
11 Sept 2026, 22:39627no change
10 Sept 2026, 17:20627no change
10 Sept 2026, 16:21627-1
10 Sept 2026, 04:38628no change
9 Sept 2026, 18:00628no change
9 Sept 2026, 12:35628-2
5 Sept 2026, 17:58630+1
3 Sept 2026, 19:21629-4
2 Sept 2026, 00:58633no change
1 Sept 2026, 20:17633+1
1 Sept 2026, 11:07632no change
31 Aug 2026, 02:54632no change
30 Aug 2026, 19:34632first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
360.0%
👍240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2026, 00:11 UTC≈2,860 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Adamity | $ADAMITY (SOL) Called by Doraemon of X100 CALLS Age: 5 Hours 5 Minutes | MC: $103.63K | Liq: $26.25K Price Volume B/S 5M: 14.9% $5K 71/30 1H: 32.7% $45K 473/317 1D: 193.0% $805K 7K/6K CA: EfupM6buY9QeqVHYcB9Se5ukhavggEkdaxyAWdfKpump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPOR

2👍2

12 Apr 2026, 00:11 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Burnie Senders | $BURNIE (SOL) Called by Doraemon of X100 CALLS Age: 8 Days | MC: $5.10M | Liq: $254.57K Price Volume B/S 5M: 0.6% $4K 15/30 1H: 1.5% $203K 907/637 1D: 109.0% $2M 8K/8K CA: CGEDT9QZDvvH5GmVkWJH2BXiMJqMJySC9ihWyr7Spump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT:

11 Apr 2026, 23:56 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 10 August 2026

🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $BURNIE 👉 +0.05X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 2. $RAM900 👉 -0.09X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 3. $crowneck 👉 -0.11X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $LFG 👉 -0.32X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 5. $ADAMITY 👉 -0.38X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 6. $emi 👉 -0.78X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS (Last 24 hours)

11 Apr 2026, 23:56 UTCviews —

@callers pinned «🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $BURNIE 👉 +0.05X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 2. $RAM900 👉 -0.09X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 3. $crowneck 👉 -0.11X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $LFG 👉 -0.32X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 5. $ADAMITY 👉 -0.38X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 6. $emi…»

11 Apr 2026, 23:51 UTCviews —

@callers pinned «🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $testicle 👉 +0.09X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 2. $neet 👉 +0.03X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 3. $crowneck 👉 +0X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $RAM900 👉 -0.01X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 5. $TripleT 👉 -0.17X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 6. $LFG 👉 -0.18X ♻️ …»

11 Apr 2026, 23:51 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 10 August 2026

🟢 TRENDING CALLS LIVE (Max ROI Daily) 1. $testicle 👉 +0.09X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 2. $neet 👉 +0.03X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 3. $crowneck 👉 +0X ♻️ THE EYE 👀 4. $RAM900 👉 -0.01X ♻️ BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 5. $TripleT 👉 -0.17X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 6. $LFG 👉 -0.18X ♻️ Pow's Gem Calls 7. $Peepa 👉 -0.7X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS 8. $emi 👉 -0.78X ♻️ Doraemon of X100 CALLS (Last 24 hours)

11 Apr 2026, 23:41 UTC810 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL crowneck | $crowneck (SOL) Called by THE EYE 👀 Age: 7 Days | MC: $62.50K | Liq: $21.31K Price Volume B/S 5M: 2.6% $2K 17/12 1H: 66.6% $13K 101/74 1D: 91.4% $34K 492/461 CA: 7VDixmZkVK9UYf6cLJWz3Vid6CUEtC6RHNeJsfJypump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot provides

11 Apr 2026, 20:11 UTC607 viewsread 10 August 2026

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 4th CALL RAM900 | $RAM900 (SOL) Called by BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 Age: 1 Day | MC: $99.05K | Liq: $25.96K Price Volume B/S 5M: -1.1% $291 3/8 1H: 5.2% $8K 93/105 1D: 55.3% $395K 6K/7K CA: FCbkxpEMKRJLw8kikXN6VwTZbKzvuWRdqcLaBpz6pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot provides no

11 Apr 2026, 18:11 UTC428 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Lets Fucking Go | $LFG (SOL) Called by Pow's Gem Calls Age: 8 Days | MC: $309.58K | Liq: $50.29K Price Volume B/S 5M: 21.7% $13K 51/41 1H: 45.5% $20K 77/95 1D: 77.2% $154K 1K/1K CA: Fh5fNaGMHQfencSGj83kyp26RrB3fCoYtYuLvXaRpump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot

11 Apr 2026, 14:11 UTC297 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL Doomer Wojak Girl | $emi (SOL) Called by Doraemon of X100 CALLS Age: 11 Hours 20 Minutes | MC: $171.04K | Liq: $34.65K Price Volume B/S 5M: 4.3% $3K 39/22 1H: -22.8% $74K 747/674 1D: 393.0% $1M 15K/11K CA: EQUU2gdzvmabX36rCxKSRSNJKtAedRHEiP8pikC8pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $T

11 Apr 2026, 13:48 UTC235 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 3rd CALL RAM900 | $RAM900 (SOL) Called by Bossy Gambles 🎲{LockedIn ARC} Age: 1 Day | MC: $99.18K | Liq: $25.34K Price Volume B/S 5M: 3.8% $5K 68/100 1H: 49.2% $38K 566/892 1D: 125.0% $230K 7K/6K CA: FCbkxpEMKRJLw8kikXN6VwTZbKzvuWRdqcLaBpz6pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: T

11 Apr 2026, 13:26 UTC158 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

NEW CALL TO ANALYSE - 1st CALL RAM900 | $RAM900 (SOL) Called by BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒 Age: 1 Day | MC: $115.25K | Liq: $27.29K Price Volume B/S 5M: 0.1% $5K 57/61 1H: 63.1% $21K 303/415 1D: 146.0% $213K 7K/6K CA: FCbkxpEMKRJLw8kikXN6VwTZbKzvuWRdqcLaBpz6pump Trade: Maestro 💠Dextools | 💠Dexscreener | 💠Ave @transact any @crypto to $TON IMPORTANT: This bot provides

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @presales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

@crypto
@sniper · 130,773
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@callers” (@presales), 630 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/presales.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.