https://x.com/binancezh/status/2114522399060488685?s=46
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)

Channel
@eyecrosschain
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,176subscribers
+395 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001650345849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eyecrosschain |
| Description | NFA - DYOR Owner: @eye_eth https://twitter.com/0xtheeye |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eyecrosschain |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:47 | 12,176 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:36 | 12,175 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:09 | 12,180 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 12,181 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 12,185 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:11 | 12,187 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 12,193 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:48 | 12,197 | +5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:45 | 12,192 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 12,194 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 12,192 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 12,193 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 12,192 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 12,186 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:10 | 12,185 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 12,193 | -7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 12,200 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 12,203 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:42 | 12,204 | -5 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 12,209 | first reading |
126 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 126 (1 August 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 19,777 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eyecrosschain. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 126 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://x.com/binancezh/status/2114522399060488685?s=46
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
I told you guys
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Achievement Unlocked: x5! 👋 @eyecrosschain made a x5+ call on bibi.ai. $195K ➡️ $984K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🪶 GIGATENEV - TRENDING #2
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Very good chart prob new ath soon
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Achievement Unlocked: Back with a bang! 💥 After a few days of no calls, @eyecrosschain made a x2+ call on bibi.ai. $195K ➡️ $408K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🟣 Kimchi - TRENDING #2
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Gamble some in $BIBI DYOR 0xb0e974ee58899dd77eb13c2c0a0adefeb30f7777 https://x.com/binance/status/2113632219122024779 Flap releases 'ID AGENT CURVE" the same day. Noticing..
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
when pve bros
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Achievement Unlocked: x4! 🖖 @eyecrosschain made a x4+ call on tapeouteth.org. $41K ➡️ $171K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔸 CNPY - TRENDING #1
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Gambled some here idk if safe or no DYOR TAPEETH introduces a new way to mine tokens on Ethereum. Instead of using GPUs, users build logic circuits that earn rewards by completing verified computational tasks. 21M fixed supply, Bitcoin-style halvings. Pretty unique tech concept. https://gmgn.ai/eth/token/eye1_0xace2e0179501a2bfad5f0fb230f38c87597d5e1b https://tapeouteth.org/#studio To mine $TAPEETH, you go to t…
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Achievement Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @eyecrosschain made a x2+ call on Unicorn. $123K ➡️ $260K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔸 AIA - TRENDING #2
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Lately, tech tokens on Solana have been outperforming memes, so I've been aping into most that look good.
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Gambled some here if this work should be good DYOR Community tokens for Kickstarter startups. Every trade funds the founders: 100% of Unicorn’s fees go to the startup. Built on Solana. https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/eye1_Cc55PUZz8VbqFLyv6UY67HTbnEi7SQRidkqXzDZgkGDD https://x.com/UnicorndotFun
Signed 0xTheEye (bandit mode on)
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @eyecrosschain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“THE EYE 👀” (@eyecrosschain), 12,176 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eyecrosschain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.