Channel
@SpyDefiLive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,768subscribers
+1,497 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003923634690 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SpyDefiLive |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SpyDefiLive |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 1,768 | +37 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 1,731 | +30 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 1,701 | +50 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 1,651 | +58 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:39 | 1,593 | +100 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 1,493 | +597 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 896 | +300 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 596 | +325 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 271 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 271 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🐺 FIRST CALLER 🪶 @kobecalls just posted ASSAY at $340K marketcap. Pair age: 47 mins CA: 0x96d2b15b35f43e0113a362b6d522a27a6a9d2138 ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 47% | Recent: 30% | Chain: 37% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🐺 FIRST CALLER 🔥 HOT CALLER (RECENT X21) 🔸 @CrikeyCallz just posted 万艾可 at $12K marketcap. Pair age: 21 mins CA: 0x55a0fa5837ca802e6f31bde2f359f1172298b4af ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 40% | Recent: 20% | Chain: 37% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🐺 FIRST CALLER 🪶 @QUEENVLAD just posted Ponsi Coin at $11K marketcap. Pair age: 51 mins CA: 0xfccd317209a4a1956f51b05a1da14dfedd3a7ad1 ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 41% | Recent: 30% | Chain: 35% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🐺 FIRST CALLER 🆕 JUST LAUNCHED 🟣 @MoonCatGems just posted Elon Meme Cycle at $32K marketcap. Pair age: 7 mins CA: 4BmAc279fmov7G59FQUwDgQPotDuTgx2H2Qf4Hmhpump ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 40% | Recent: 40% | Chain: 39% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🪶 @RichardzPlays just posted Navier-Stokes at $54K marketcap. Pair age: 85 mins CA: 0x3e16f80af9a1cac4574e33a9b69c9a128d3a9222 ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 20% | Recent: 30% | Chain: 24% 📞Total Calls For Project: 3 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🐺 FIRST CALLER 📡 HIGH CONSISTENCY CALLER (55%) 🆕 JUST LAUNCHED 🟣 @mackcalls just posted Cleo at $5.6K marketcap. Pair age: 1 mins CA: EZuFedzAiDsaHHDuT2gGFrDxbkgeUSWtkzdBJyRRMgJL ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 44% | Recent: 55% | Chain: 42% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🐺 FIRST CALLER 🪶 @lollycalls just posted Le Chaton Fat at $597K marketcap. Pair age: 49 mins CA: 0xae4abc016d3fdb31ecad9417d1c8d45d424446a8 ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 48% | Recent: 40% | Chain: 46% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
📡 HIGH CONSISTENCY CALLER (70%) 🎆 HYPED PROJECT 🪶 @canodiary just posted Bankless Coin at $339K marketcap. Pair age: CA: 0x5e8907a3f45d7b30be6addbab0312e46e5061614 ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 45% | Recent: 70% | Chain: 57% 📞Total Calls For Project: 16 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🐺 FIRST CALLER 📡 HIGH CONSISTENCY CALLER (50%) 🆕 JUST LAUNCHED 🟣 @mackcalls just posted Cleo at $4.2K marketcap. Pair age: 9 mins CA: 9wCBv9vSYToNVHnkUDaJ1qUyCTKNDoqqjFdMdoz2gKEm ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 44% | Recent: 50% | Chain: 42% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🟣 @skyrimcallgamble just posted honter boden at $672K marketcap. Pair age: 4 months CA: uuxWwFL6G9UjiYRZvWxJrSB18V1oKBgYrmueamREK57 ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 39% | Recent: 25% | Chain: 37% 📞Total Calls For Project: 3 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🐺 FIRST CALLER 🟣 @Satoshisgambolrs just posted Rexniu at $19K marketcap. Pair age: 11 days CA: BoQR3zmiKRY6TtmztdvHMq1cKsNUh6WxHUWnjL3TNusu ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 40% | Recent: 40% | Chain: 39% 📞Total Calls For Project: 1 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
🪶 @AlextheGreatCalls just posted Ascii Pons at $16K marketcap. Pair age: 1 months CA: 0x4413df9a702d1998abb64b8055cdcc56e81d719e ⚖️ Caller Consistency: Overall: 44% | Recent: 40% | Chain: 44% 📞Total Calls For Project: 2 👤 View Call 📈 View KOL Stats 🕵️ Powered by @SpyDefi
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SpyDefiLive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SpyDefiLive named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SpyDefi Live” (@SpyDefiLive), 1,768 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SpyDefiLive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.