Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Meta caller

Channel

Meta caller

@metacaller

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

41,186subscribers

-3,127 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001880851888
TypeChannel
Username@metacaller
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/metacaller

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

39,63744,31341,9757 August 2026 — 44,313 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,286 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,245 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,192 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,168 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,087 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,054 subscribers13 August 2026 — 44,018 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,994 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,958 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,859 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,396 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,382 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,330 subscribers21 August 2026 — 43,281 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43,143 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,008 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,975 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,896 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,819 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,399 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,970 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,522 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,174 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,849 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,599 subscribers4 September 2026 — 43,136 subscribers6 September 2026 — 42,275 subscribers10 September 2026 — 43,115 subscribers12 September 2026 — 42,829 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,764 subscribers15 September 2026 — 42,591 subscribers17 September 2026 — 42,513 subscribers29 September 2026 — 42,192 subscribers5 October 2026 — 41,795 subscribers9 October 2026 — 40,949 subscribers13 October 2026 — 40,360 subscribers15 October 2026 — 40,105 subscribers15 October 2026 — 39,918 subscribers17 October 2026 — 39,787 subscribers18 October 2026 — 39,750 subscribers19 October 2026 — 39,715 subscribers20 October 2026 — 39,671 subscribers21 October 2026 — 39,637 subscribers22 October 2026 — 43,577 subscribers23 October 2026 — 43,527 subscribers24 October 2026 — 43,194 subscribers25 October 2026 — 43,133 subscribers26 October 2026 — 43,089 subscribers27 October 2026 — 43,047 subscribers28 October 2026 — 42,238 subscribers29 October 2026 — 42,051 subscribers30 October 2026 — 41,501 subscribers31 October 2026 — 41,367 subscribers1 November 2026 — 41,307 subscribers2 November 2026 — 41,281 subscribers3 November 2026 — 41,256 subscribers4 November 2026 — 41,239 subscribers5 November 2026 — 41,222 subscribers6 November 2026 — 41,186 subscribers41,1867 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -3,127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,936–45,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 05:1941,186-36
5 Nov 2026, 03:2041,222-17
4 Nov 2026, 05:5741,239-17
3 Nov 2026, 06:4941,256-25
2 Nov 2026, 03:5941,281-26
1 Nov 2026, 04:3841,307-60
31 Oct 2026, 07:4941,367-134
30 Oct 2026, 11:0841,501-550
29 Oct 2026, 12:2142,051-187
28 Oct 2026, 11:4742,238-809
27 Oct 2026, 12:5643,047-42
26 Oct 2026, 10:3543,089-44
25 Oct 2026, 11:4843,133-61
24 Oct 2026, 12:5843,194-333
23 Oct 2026, 13:5543,527-50
22 Oct 2026, 12:2743,577+3,940
21 Oct 2026, 07:4539,637-34
20 Oct 2026, 04:5739,671-44
19 Oct 2026, 02:0839,715-35
18 Oct 2026, 03:4739,750first reading

Engagement

1,477 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 41,186 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,050
369 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
392
of 1,477 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held1,477 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total1,863,289
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 392 posts held from the last 30 days (1.79%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈4,780 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Over $1,000,000,000,000 wiped out from the US stock market at open. @WatcherGuru

5 Nov 2026, 12:47 UTC≈4,890 viewsread 6 November 2026

stank listed on gate https://www.gate.com/alpha/sol-5wsjHxT5nW5jQuVupXUNnYszF3WoWCfGGk9LMcsCJzY8

5 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC≈4,950 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$GHOST moving Up tapping new ath here 350k mc now 🔥🔥🔥 This is good should send HIGHER!!!

5 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC≈4,340 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 $48 GHOST RIDER BUY! 🔥🔥🔥 ➡️ PUMP: 11260.21 ($48) ⬅️ GHOST: 145K 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: NEW 📈 Marketcap: $326K 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending 😎 Catch x100 plays before they happen

5 Nov 2026, 10:19 UTC≈4,750 viewsread 6 November 2026

Aped here $GHOST on Solana 250k mc Looking sold here GTA VI meta is heating up as launch approaches, and IMO $GHOST has some of the strongest lore should hit millions i think https://x.com/gtavighostrider https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/lHoG4Y1P_42qKoGmEPTRJsa5jWrYwpydL8RkBwMvg2ykYVoerpump 42qKoGmEPTRJsa5jWrYwpydL8RkBwMvg2ykYVoerpump

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,477 posts we hold for @metacaller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @metacaller as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
23 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
23 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Meta Gambler
@MetaGambler · 21,857
#1
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 97,343
#2
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,253
#3
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,194
#4
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,550
#5
wat is des
@watisdes · 29,897
#6
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,820
#7
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 36,687
#8
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,671
#9
The Engineers
@engineercalls · 7,288
#10
The Don’s Degens
@degensgems · 14,888
#11
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 14,145
#12
Funkyonchain
@funkyonchain · 4,666
#13
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 77,721
#14
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,278
#15
Levi's Gem Calls
@LevisGemCalls · 12,122
#16
Whale Wallet Watchers
@WhaleWalletWatchers · 7,795
#17
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,277
#18
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,095
#19
Dizzy Whale Calls
@DizzyWhaleCalls · 6,764
#20
Zagy's Trades
@ZAGREBIAN · 6,890
#21
Crafty Gambles
@CraftyGambles · 11,025
#22
WHALE DEEZE • PRINT Alphas KOL🧲™️
@DeezeSignal · 3,635
#23
Brainstorm Alphas
@BrainstormAlphas · 6,233
#24
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,917
#25
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,607
#26
Dream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 11,675
#27
Nakamoto's Gamble
@nakamoto_gamble · 3,873
#28
The Blockchain God's Gambles
@TBGgambLes · 5,565
#29
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,180
#30
Neo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,541
#31
FRENS GEMS 💎
@FrenzGems · 4,997
#32
Rave Gambles
@aliceandrave · 1,435
#33
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 34,832
#34
Clueless Calls
@CluelessCalls · 3,297
#35
Shyroshi Gambles
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 24,203
#36
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,870
#37
Ev's Alphas
@HardSnipe · 11,671
#38
KOREA alpha DEGEN
@KOREAalphaDEGEN · 8,156
#39
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 46,709
#40
Jolup CCTV 공지방
@Jolup_CCTV · 4,861
#41
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,054
#42
Zion Gambles
@ZionGems · 2,502
#43
𝘿𝙄𝙋 𝘾𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙨 | 𝙂𝙖𝙢𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙋𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙨 🎲
@buythedipcall · 1,702
#44
Archerr's GAMBLE 🎲
@Archerrgambles · 5,599
#45
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 631,925
#46
Funkyongamble
@funkyongamble · 2,320
#47
PumpFun Moonitor
@pumpfun_moonitor · 830
#48
Call Analyser (TRX only)
@CallAnalyserTRX · 4,148
#49
AJM Gems
@AJM1000x · 6,800
#50
MAXI DEGENS
@smartmaxidegens · 2,184
#51
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,388
#52
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 15,751
#53
PumpSwap Migration Alert
@pumpswap_migration · 2,214
#54
Quartz Alpha
@QuartzAlphaX · 7,984
#55
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 29,205
#56
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,144
#57
1000𝕏 Multi Chain
@MultiChain1000x · 9,381
#58
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,833
#59
GENESIS CHAIN CALLS
@GenesisChain_Calls · 14,242
#60
GWS
@GWSai · 2,805
#61
Phanes Trending
@PhanesTrending · 6,011
#62
Long House
@xraygambles · 11,570
#63
Gems Mine Treasures
@GemsmineEth · 5,683
#64
Sunswap Migration Alert
@sunswap_migration · 71
#65
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,444
#66
SLANK CALLS
@SLANKCALLS · 1,274
#67
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,141
#68
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,044
#69
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,634
#70
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 26,519
#71
⚔️ Risky Gems Hunters ⚔️ Calls Channel
@RiskyGemsHuntersCalls · 3,028
#72
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,555
#73
BASED DEGEN GEMS
@BasedDegenGems · 2,674
#74
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,225
#75
Sapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,138
#76
고양이가세상을구한다
@catsaveworld · 1,732
#77
무앵구 스포츠 주작 연구소
@mooangoo · 452
#78

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Meta Gambler
@MetaGambler · 21,857
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
OOTD HIJAB AESTHETIC 🦋
@ootd_outfit_hijab_indonesia · 32,986
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 17 September 2026
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,277
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
Phanes Hub
@PhanesHub · 46,561
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,194
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 🐧
@brookcalls · 29,768
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 29,205
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Gems Mine
@MineGems · 21,333
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Meta caller” (@metacaller), 41,186 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metacaller.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.