Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Iced's Inbred HQ

Channel

Iced's Inbred HQ

@inbredhq

Not marked by Telegram, checked 15 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,211subscribers

+178 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002201830318
TypeChannel
Username@inbredhq
Descriptioninbred channel, same rules apply rug or 100x low cap shitters and retard investments LLC only contacts: @icedknife
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/inbredhq

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0337,3257,1797 August 2026 — 7,033 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,033 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,034 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,054 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,050 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,049 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,052 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,218 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,230 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,290 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,325 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,309 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,293 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,288 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,289 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,267 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,265 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,256 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,247 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,237 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,226 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,218 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,211 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,215 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,225 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,211 subscribers7,2117 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net +178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,989–7,369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 16:167,211-14
4 Nov 2026, 20:597,225+10
1 Nov 2026, 13:067,215+4
29 Oct 2026, 13:377,211-7
26 Oct 2026, 05:197,218-8
23 Oct 2026, 15:067,226-11
20 Oct 2026, 12:447,237-10
17 Oct 2026, 23:167,247-9
15 Oct 2026, 04:377,256-9
12 Oct 2026, 11:567,265-2
5 Oct 2026, 20:577,267-22
28 Sept 2026, 13:227,289+1
16 Sept 2026, 06:177,288-5
12 Sept 2026, 09:197,293-16
8 Sept 2026, 09:407,309-16
2 Sept 2026, 21:097,325+35
30 Aug 2026, 16:467,290+60
27 Aug 2026, 06:377,230+12
24 Aug 2026, 16:587,218+166
20 Aug 2026, 18:447,052first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.75%
avg views ÷ 7,211 subscribers
Avg views / post
487
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.925%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held35 (6 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total973
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
98
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 27 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6949.6%
🔥2920.9%
👍2417.3%
🥰64.32%
🍌32.16%
🤝32.16%
😭21.44%
👏10.719%
😴10.719%
🙏10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

26 Oct 2026, 23:53 UTC430 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

tapped 100k again, people starting to come around to its potential $LP

🔥3❤1

26 Oct 2026, 21:46 UTC543 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

have been pretty inactive here but i like this enough to share here. $LP pretty much takes the meta and super charges it to the ultimate pairing ticker in liquititty pair and you get pump rewards only 30k mc CA: 3kFWwzjQ6cuLw5KUCmLX3t2h5F1NawncF5dL8wxUpump Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/hwxjb7tqpdnv2bewzdjavzqcdnr5wzen4cnmiemhvimr

🍌3❤1🥰1

4 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,740 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026

got raped but ima dust it i think. good narra

❤3🤝3

4 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 8 November 2026

gambled here: 0x8c3042345c24dd7e66cbe3308582e9f92857ce42

26 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 8 November 2026

🆕🟢 BUY earl on Raydium 🔹 farokh (PUMP) J5ExSFQ5muDWxgDudaH4MPD2cye9zkL7HRhzP774YWLc 🔹farokh (PUMP) swapped 1,000 ($999.94) USDC for 12,836,345.18 ($1,000) earl @$0.0000779 ✊Holds: 12.84M (1.28%) 🔹farokh (PUMP): USDC: -1,000.31 ($-1,000.25) earl: +12,836,345.18 ($1,000) 💊 #earl | MC: $77.90K | Seen: 22m: DS | 👥INFO 65nXmwxNvF1akva3Q9AaTT8AEqVrkzQXZEi9Rjzwpump

26 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC≈1,130 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

solid start, bonded hit 100k happy with how its moving so far 4x $earl

❤2👍1🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 22:54 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026

degen aped some $earl CA: 65nXmwxNvF1akva3Q9AaTT8AEqVrkzQXZEi9Rjzwpump 25k shitter made me laugh https://x.com/earlonsol_/status/2092747024672170399?s=20

👍2❤1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @inbredhq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,643
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,052
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 30,916
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,810
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,363
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝
@J7tradingjournal · 20,723
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,994
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 28,369
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Renzos Degen Alpha
@degenrenzo · 18,584
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,030
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
crash alerts - leverage controllers
@crashalerts · 19,043
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,145
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,810
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 26,581
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
don’t bet the house
@dontbetthehouse · 25,552
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,158
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,150
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 44,757
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Shmoos Journal ✍️
@shmooscasino · 29,311
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,343
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,733
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 46,997
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,596
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 82,067
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iced's Inbred HQ” (@inbredhq), 7,211 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inbredhq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.