Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Catfish Calls by Poe

Channel

Catfish Calls by Poe

@CatfishcallsbyPoe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,961subscribers

-1,523 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001594723240
TypeChannel
Username@CatfishcallsbyPoe
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CatfishcallsbyPoe

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

34,96136,48435,722.57 August 20268 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,523. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,733–36,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 22:0534,961-33
7 Nov 2026, 12:5634,994-9
6 Nov 2026, 14:5435,003-13
5 Nov 2026, 17:2835,016-28
4 Nov 2026, 15:5435,044-11
3 Nov 2026, 17:0435,055-9
2 Nov 2026, 18:4635,064-15
1 Nov 2026, 15:1935,079-18
31 Oct 2026, 16:0435,097-21
30 Oct 2026, 14:4635,118-26
29 Oct 2026, 15:0635,144-23
28 Oct 2026, 13:2635,167-13
27 Oct 2026, 13:5135,180-19
26 Oct 2026, 12:5035,199-13
25 Oct 2026, 14:5735,212-12
24 Oct 2026, 16:3435,224-12
23 Oct 2026, 18:3635,236-13
22 Oct 2026, 21:3735,249-9
21 Oct 2026, 19:5135,258-18
20 Oct 2026, 14:0035,276first reading

Engagement

236 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.50%
avg views ÷ 34,961 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.172%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 236 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held236 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total20,822
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 40s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

653 reactions across 150 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤38358.7%
🔥14522.2%
🤩416.28%
👍345.21%
👏213.22%
🥰192.91%
🎉101.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 236 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC210 viewsread 8 November 2026

https://x.com/kantaro0925/status/2119397239747493937?a=WuGiyVNwRhR__Jg92s4&s=20

8 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC325 viewsread 8 November 2026

https://pump.fun/c/51a3c45a-e2b8-40f7-943f-aefafaa27ade/poe?reply=9fc97a1b-f663-4302-b609-4f83786fac82

5 Nov 2026, 04:27 UTC895 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://x.com/poe_real69/status/2118198113240502647?a=LaI4_CiLeNVb5hGJDfc&s=20

❤1

4 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC990 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Should do well make aliens great dev he’s gonna hustle it

❤1

4 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC978 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Grabbed some Trump wars https://pump.fun/c/51a3c45a-e2b8-40f7-943f-aefafaa27ade/poe

❤1

1 Nov 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,340 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

search anakin on X the content being pushed out is insane

❤1

1 Nov 2026, 20:37 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 8 November 2026

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2116990933103509723?a=Eqmmn420XR6G8dQaic0&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,150 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://x.com/NewWorldAssets/status/2116825884384772132?a=IKZgC87Az6pf6j5_hj0&s=20

❤1

1 Nov 2026, 16:33 UTC≈1,050 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Everyone's finally realizing that the Jedi were evil in 2026 but I figured it out in 2005 when I watched ROTS and walked out thinking Anakin was right Anakin 'turned evil' because he: -loved his mom -loved his wife -was stronger than the whole Council -noticed the system was corrupt and broken The Jedi knew he was the Chosen One and still wouldn't make him a Master, because he was better than them The Jedi: 'We ca…

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 236 posts we hold for @CatfishcallsbyPoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @CatfishcallsbyPoe as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
6 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,145
#1
SHITTY CALLS BY POE (DON'T BUY)
@SHITTYCALLZBYPOE · 10,685
#2
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,344
#3
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 28,315
#4
Hopium Casino
@HopiumCasino · 13,965
#5
CTM Calls
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,385
#6
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,608
#7
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,786
#8
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,134
#9
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,250
#10
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,052
#11
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,798
#12
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,892
#13
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,024
#14
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,706
#15
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,316
#16
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 34,787
#17
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,211
#18
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,607
#19
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,172
#20
Diary of Apes | α |
@diaryofapes · 4,572
#21
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 46,971
#22
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,776
#23
Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls · 30,800
#24
Stuff im (Penn) buying
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,296
#25
based kook calls
@hellokook · 15,914
#26
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 30,916
#27
Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom
@pwnlord · 8,395
#28
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 28,963
#29
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 14,084
#30
Kingdom of X100 CALLS
@Kingdom_X100_CALLS · 18,385
#31
Kanye's Greatest Hits
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,323
#32
KOBE'S CALLS
@KobesCalls · 17,558
#33
Chad Crypto
@Chad_Crypto · 15,716
#34
yelo's degen log
@yeloalfa · 10,551
#35
Gay calls only, buy if ur gay.
@wifechangingcallss · 6,390
#36
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,582
#37
KVON ❤️‍🔥 REKT ARC
@kvontrades · 3,506
#38
Pyro Trading Journal
@pyrotradingjournal · 14,759
#39
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 28,702
#40
THE EYE 👀
@eyecrosschain · 12,150
#41
Zero lightning calls ⚡️⚡️
@zerolightningcalls · 2,220
#42
Dream Calls 100x
@DreamCalls100x · 11,673
#43
💰ANIME GEMS💰
@AnimeGems · 9,618
#44
Noodles Research
@Noodles_calls · 11,488
#45
Babur's OnlyRugs
@baburcalls · 5,201
#46
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,338
#47
Prerich lobby by mememe 💸
@prerichlobby69 · 6,655
#48
Cautious bull run enjoyers
@smolinsanity · 14,026
#49
The Don's Calls
@TheDonsCalls · 12,391
#50
Fomo’s Mojo Dojo Casa House
@fomomofosol · 14,230
#51
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 97,229
#52
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 631,889
#53
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,270
#54
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 46,683
#55
666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,578
#56
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,140
#57
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,521
#58
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,071
#59
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,619
#60
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 77,644
#61
Solstice's Degens
@solsticedegens · 6,829
#62
wat is des
@watisdes · 29,870
#63
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 36,643
#64
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,524
#65
don’t bet the house
@dontbetthehouse · 25,552
#66
Cold Capital ❄️
@ColdCapital · 4,370
#67
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,290
#68
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 15,731
#69
wuzie makes money
@wuziemakesmoney · 8,851
#70
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,134
#71
Sapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,122
#72
STEKI'S BASEDMENT 😈
@stekibasedment · 4,002
#73
Neo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,523
#74
$hills Dollar Menu (Daily Trading Journal)
@TheIllestShills · 5,022
#75
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,138
#76
Luffy’s diary
@Luffysgemcalls · 10,875
#77
The Don’s Degens
@degensgems · 14,871
#78
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,458
#79
1000𝕏 Multi Chain
@MultiChain1000x · 9,373
#80
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 80,048
#81
Senzu Gambles
@senzugambles · 1,832
#82
GWS
@GWSai · 2,804
#83
CaesarsCalls
@Caesars_Calls · 38,159
#84

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 28,315
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls · 30,800
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,344
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,250
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,316
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
crash alerts - leverage controllers
@crashalerts · 19,043
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 25,060
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
don’t bet the house
@dontbetthehouse · 25,552
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 28,963
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 28,702
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,798
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,338
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 24,908
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,052
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 182,912
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 161,886
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,134
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,145
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
EZ Money’s Gems 💎
@EZMoneyCalls · 22,949
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,024
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Crypto Calls ❁
@dr_crypto_channel · 17,394
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,608
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,786
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 30,916
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Catfish Calls by Poe” (@CatfishcallsbyPoe), 34,961 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CatfishcallsbyPoe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.