https://x.com/EricCryptoman/status/2102071135399530548?s=20

Channel
Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,286subscribers
+112 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001381024355 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @erics_calls |
| Description | A channel of some of my meme coin plays, long-term investments & leverage trades. Nothing in this channel is financial advice. DM @EricCryptoman if you have alpha and I may listen. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/erics_calls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 31,286 | -16 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 31,302 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 31,326 | +12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 31,314 | +12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 31,302 | +54 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 31,248 | +154 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 31,094 | +70 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 31,024 | +68 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 30,956 | +28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 30,928 | +39 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 30,889 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 30,893 | +37 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 30,856 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 30,850 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 30,852 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 30,860 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 30,867 | -30 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 30,897 | -29 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 30,926 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 30,941 | first reading |
Engagement
115 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.11%
- avg views ÷ 31,286 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,220
- 89 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 89
- of 115 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 115 (1 June 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 197,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 19:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,660
- Videos
- ≈74
- Links
- ≈1,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 03s
- Average length
- 1m 03s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://x.com/EricCryptoman/status/2101805098389143900?s=20
https://x.com/ericcryptoman/status/2101250333640896601?s=46 $1000 giveaway for the bros
Someone paired $SHIT with a NASDAQ listed toilet maker. It flipped the stock volume by 7x yesterday but the stock is still valued over 10x higher. Now that's a funny narra. 0x22eb9f1c5385ed74257da42d8021916c2d837135
Iykyk
https://x.com/ericcryptoman/status/2101231911792222629?s=46
https://x.com/hodlandchill64/status/2101123722237383135?s=46 Nobody on the timeline is ready for $HODL I don’t think even I am. I’m damn excited though. GameKyuubi is back 13 years after creating the word “HODL” and he’s built some actual game changing technology for the project. Retire & log off forever play. Hh3oTaqDCKKfdBgsQEvxp9sUwyNf8x9qmKqEMLBWpump
https://x.com/JakeGagain/status/2101049962671022272?s=20 Jake broke Flork down well.
FLORK starts it's ascension to $100m today. Never fade @binance 15+ FLORK posts on official binance pages this month and it's already listed on Binance Alpha (fastest alpha listing on any memecoin) The writing is on the wall, it's up to you to read it.
Bottom is in for $USDC. The only good meme on Arc. Do you think it tops on day 1? If not, this is a no brainer. UpSideDownCat Early CASHCAT vibes. 0x8e98a62a995a50eca9979bfa016f91bf36a8f9d9 https://x.com/USDCat__
1st Elon interaction with the OFFICIAL ROBINHOOD COIN I told you it'd happen - the optimus content coming from the Robinhood page is the best on X, and a bunch of people elon follow frequently interact with it, making elon see it on his feed. https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2100501754588627217?s=20 Shit is going to get crazy for OPTIMUS soon. Potential multi-billion dollar memecoin. 0x0fF9072a1EAD154d92C2d2Fef16AFb…
So it starts.... Unipcs (Bonk guy) just announced he has a bag and it's the only ARC coin he's in too. Never fade the #1 organic, unforced meme on the new chain. $USDC / $USDC The upside down cat that pays you USDC rewards. https://fomo.family/tokens/arc/0x8e98a62a995a50eca9979bfa016f91bf36a8f9d9
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @erics_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Have you ever played Runescape?
- Yes, still play12%
- Used to play33%
- Never played57%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Did you know Robinhood had it's own chain and the founder, Vlad is publicly supporting memes?
- No20%
- Yes, but haven't bridged36%
- Yes, I'm trading there47%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
When did you first get into crypto?
- Pre 2018 (Veteran)30%
- Pre 2021 (OG)48%
- Pre 2024 (Battle tested)16%
- Post 2024 (New)7%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@CryptoMatriXCMX · 3832 postsAeon's Gems
@AeonsGems · 4,1741 postCTM Calls
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,8191 postDefiApeCalls ☎️
@DefiApeGems · 46,5021 postEGGMAN'S GOLDEN EGGS
@EGGMANWAGMI · 2251 postGWS DAO Official Announcements Channel
@GWSFinanceAnnouncements · 101 postSignal calls
@SIGNALCALLS · 35,4321 postYECALLS100X
@YECALLS100X · 31 postFair Launch BSC
@bsc_fairlaunches · 231 postDON ADAMS
@donsdimes · 31 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@erics_calls named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906#1
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,785#2
@noodlestrade · 6,372#3
@Noodles_calls · 11,770#4
@Chad_Crypto · 16,061#5
@maythousdegens · 15,493#6
@Kingdom_X100_CALLS · 18,729#7
@jamiescave · 13,490#8
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,984#9
@spidersjournal · 32,968#10
@DegenKaduna · 9,670#11
@senzu_calls · 6,790#12
@eezzyjournal · 41,000#13
@printspress · 19,141#14
@watisdes · 30,089#15
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890#16
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,904#17
@venomcalls · 35,703#18
@TheIcebergCasino · 3,440#19
@Luffysgemcalls · 11,051#20
@kvontrades · 3,585#21
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,332#22
@smolinsanity · 14,361#23
@NeoCallss · 17,486#24
@CF_MarketWatch · 1,770#25
@degendivers · 3,322#26
@kobesgambles · 16,074#27
@KobesCalls · 18,000#28
@KazisGemFarm · 7,596#29
@LouisCooperCrypto · 3,922#30
@MaestroBotsHub · 167,518#31
@VenusQueen2 · 4,294#32
@ASTRAL_GAMBLES · 3,340#33
@eezzydegenjournal · 12,992#34
@MonkeCage · 11,184#35
@SapphireCalls · 12,429#36
@moneymancalls1104 · 10,585#37
@TheReaperGems · 15,374#38
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178#39
@TheDonsCalls · 12,917#40
@MultiChain1000x · 9,497#41
@lucasapeeth · 6,369#42
@CryptiCMS · 4,162#43
@BizonacciGems · 1,644#44
@DreamCalls100x · 10,755#45
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,542#46
@maythouscalls · 35,747#47
@brozinkers · 54,016#48
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,695#49
@WatcherGuru · 627,715#50
@GemsofRa · 17,853#51
@dogendojo · 35,314#52
@HopiumCasino · 14,368#53
@arcanegems · 47,229#54
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,892#55
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,819#56
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777#57
@diaryofapes · 4,677#58
@degenshit100x · 5,843#59
@ryoshigamble · 38,003#60
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,341#61
@hatoriinvestments · 8,887#62
@sugarydick · 33,742#63
@shitco1nguru · 3,378#64
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,085#65
@mad_apes_call · 80,345#66
@senzugambles · 1,883#67
@pswoleplays · 4,177#68
@EurosniperDegen · 5,336#69
@earlycallsby0xEly · 8,643#70
@inbredhq · 7,288#71
@defiant1s · 82,222#72
@KillersCalls69 · 4,274#73
@DegenSeals · 34,271#74
@Caesars_Calls · 39,380#75
@wifechangingcallss · 6,225#76
@Joe420Calls · 7,200#77
@degensgems · 15,169#78
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,446#79
@iTokenEthereum · 16,079#80
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,416#81
@Donkey_Calls · 1,057#82
@IndyReviews · 4,319#83
@teammacnbtc · 33,036#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 188,745
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@theionicxbtt · 23,588
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
@MaestroBotsHub · 167,518
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,785
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@teammacnbtc · 33,036
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@investigations · 107,333
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,542
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@inside_calls · 25,082
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
@dogendojo · 35,314
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@dontbetthehouse · 26,300
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
@koroush_ak_tg · 44,659
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eric Cryptomans Journal” (@erics_calls), 31,286 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/erics_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.