Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Iced's House of Degeneracy

Channel

Iced's House of Degeneracy

@houseofdegeneracy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,984subscribers

-135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001819368322
TypeChannel
Username@houseofdegeneracy
DescriptionONLY accounts associated: @icedknife All others are SCAMS. PLAYS ARE HIGHLY RISKY BE VERY CAUTIOUS MANY COINS, NFTS, ASSETS WILL RUG. SOME WILL DO WELL. ape first research later. 30 IQ, 100% retard.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/houseofdegeneracy

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,95237,14337,047.57 August 2026 — 37,119 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,119 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,081 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,071 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,046 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,034 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,000 subscribers15 August 2026 — 36,979 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,985 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,973 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,979 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,966 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,952 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,956 subscribers23 August 2026 — 36,958 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,143 subscribers26 August 2026 — 37,128 subscribers27 August 2026 — 37,120 subscribers28 August 2026 — 37,085 subscribers29 August 2026 — 37,073 subscribers30 August 2026 — 37,064 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37,075 subscribers1 September 2026 — 37,072 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,080 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37,072 subscribers4 September 2026 — 37,070 subscribers7 September 2026 — 37,053 subscribers10 September 2026 — 37,017 subscribers12 September 2026 — 37,009 subscribers14 September 2026 — 37,005 subscribers16 September 2026 — 37,004 subscribers18 September 2026 — 36,984 subscribers36,9847 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,923–37,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:3736,984-20
16 Sept 2026, 03:2137,004-1
14 Sept 2026, 08:5737,005-4
12 Sept 2026, 19:0037,009-8
10 Sept 2026, 22:0037,017-36
7 Sept 2026, 22:0137,053-17
4 Sept 2026, 19:4037,070-2
3 Sept 2026, 02:0537,072-8
2 Sept 2026, 00:2337,080+8
1 Sept 2026, 03:5437,072-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:4437,075+11
30 Aug 2026, 01:4337,064-9
29 Aug 2026, 03:1437,073-12
28 Aug 2026, 06:4437,085-35
27 Aug 2026, 09:2537,120-8
26 Aug 2026, 06:0337,128-15
25 Aug 2026, 03:0337,143+185
23 Aug 2026, 19:5736,958+2
22 Aug 2026, 05:3636,956+4
20 Aug 2026, 19:2436,952first reading

Engagement

135 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.99%
avg views ÷ 36,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.511%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 71 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held135 (30 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total163,990
Reactions total802
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 13:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,440
Videos
≈19
Links
≈1,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,752 reactions across 129 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,00857.5%
🔥39022.3%
🥰955.42%
🍌844.79%
👏583.31%
💯472.68%
🫡281.60%
🍾181.03%
👌160.913%
🎉40.228%
🏆40.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,752 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 134 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @houseofdegeneracy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 135 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,610 views13 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

tesla silicon valley twitter baiting an elon interaction lmaoooo $CALI

🔥8❤2🍾2🍌1

24 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTCviews —

Iced's House of Degeneracy pinned «everyone should make a pump account btw don’t say i didnt warn you https://pump.fun/join/icedknife»

24 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,090 views7 reactionsread 25 September 2026

everyone should make a pump account btw don’t say i didnt warn you https://pump.fun/join/icedknife

❤3🍾2🍌1🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,530 views17 reactionsread 25 September 2026

$CALI shipping pretty well 2m and 5x from entry elon musks moms dog dont overcomplicate it 8k4sBtEeK4pf26noKqApv8NBTnuSJcbdwpKYknk5PbAA

❤8🍾3🔥3🍌1💯1🥰1

22 Sept 2026, 02:26 UTC≈1,680 views9 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Arctide alr burned 30% of their supply pretty insane rate that they're burning thru if arc ecosystem flourishes, this is my bet https://x.com/ArctideApp/status/2102086463676363236?s=20

❤6🥰2🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 00:06 UTC≈2,090 views17 reactionsread 25 September 2026

$CALI hit new highs again at 2m as Maye Musk continues to interact and gains fees directly from the coin. Kinda unsure how this isn't higher.

❤12🔥3💯2

19 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC≈2,830 views17 reactionsread 25 September 2026

everything else in your life should be paused

❤12💯5

18 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC≈2,550 views11 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Ethervista is now Arctide. Don't have too much exposure to the arc ecosystem atm so it seemed smart to start with an ecosystem play. These guys have a dex, launchpad, and social trading app. They pretty much are setting themselves up to be the pumpfun of Arc. Only 110k market cap. Fees from platform go towards a buyback and burn. Pretty much the exact formula you'd want from a launchpad. These guys have delivered …

❤8🔥3

18 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTC≈2,090 views7 reactionsread 25 September 2026

hit 1.5m overnight like 4x from entry but just now hovering back at where we got in

❤5👏1🥰1

18 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,630 views8 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Maye Musk has been liking the cali twitters replys btw

❤7🥰1

18 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈2,720 views18 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

I bought the OG coin on this because i knew the narrative was perfect as Elon’s mom always posts about her dog Cali - now with paids new tek we can send fees directly to maye musks X money account pretty much the best way to get someones attention and all we want from her is to post her cute dog. Elons pets have done billions prior, his moms dog is a great bet imo $CALI 375k mc CA: 8k4sBtEeK4pf26noKqApv8NBTnuSJcbd…

❤11🍌4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @houseofdegeneracy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@houseofdegeneracy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
#1
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,288
#2
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890
#3
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,742
#4
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 14,237
#5
Solstice's Degens
@solsticedegens · 6,822
#6
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,493
#7
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 19,141
#8
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 41,000
#9
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,372
#10
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
#11
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,892
#12
Pyro Trading Journal
@pyrotradingjournal · 17,102
#13
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,650
#14
Brainstorm Alphas
@BrainstormAlphas · 6,321
#15
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,747
#16
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,375
#17
based kook calls
@hellokook · 16,218
#18
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
#19
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,271
#20
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,695
#21
Cold Capital ❄️
@ColdCapital · 4,414
#22
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,260
#23
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 18,605
#24
Prerich lobby by mememe 💸
@prerichlobby69 · 6,813
#25
Shah’s Calls
@shahlito · 31,896
#26
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,904
#27
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178
#28
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,790
#29
Affu Calls
@affucalls · 7,337
#30
Hopium Casino
@HopiumCasino · 14,368
#31
Fomo’s Mojo Dojo Casa House
@fomomofosol · 14,638
#32
Patty's Trap House
@pattystraphouse · 2,905
#33
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,486
#34
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,703
#35
Diary of Apes | α |
@diaryofapes · 4,677
#36
PipscallsDegens
@Pipscalldegens · 6,184
#37
Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom
@pwnlord · 8,522
#38
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,789
#39
Kanye's Greatest Hits
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,332
#40
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 35,314
#41
CTM Calls
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,819
#42
Cautious bull run enjoyers
@smolinsanity · 14,361
#43
Poké's Balls
@PokeCallsCrypto · 10,114
#44
The Casino
@thecasinoeye · 6,380
#45
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777
#46
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 53,804
#47
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,416
#48
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,715
#49
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 47,229
#50
666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,742
#51
FAST's PALACE
@fastspalace · 3,220
#52
wuzie makes money
@wuziemakesmoney · 8,984
#53
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,968
#54
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,542
#55
SHITTY CALLS BY POE (DON'T BUY)
@SHITTYCALLZBYPOE · 10,881
#56
ferb's friends
@ferbsfriendz · 5,334
#57
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
#58
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
#59
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,490
#60
goodmans journal
@solgoodmancalls · 8,075
#61
Stuff im (Penn) buying
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,341
#62
yelo's degen log
@yeloalfa · 10,836
#63
Xander's Trenches
@xanderstrenches · 11,113
#64
AJM Gems
@AJM1000x · 6,985
#65
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 16,074
#66
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,747
#67
Klutch Trades
@klutchtrades · 4,515
#68
Neo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,486
#69
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,853
#70
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,870
#71
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 15,286
#72
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,315
#73
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 33,065
#74
Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,786
#75
Catolicc's Oil Money
@catolicc100x · 10,701
#76
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 82,222
#77
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 40,779
#78
Sapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,429
#79
Wiza Moves
@wizamoves · 1,883
#80

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,742
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,372
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 41,000
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,650
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 48,142
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Shah’s Calls
@shahlito · 31,896
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 25,082
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 35,314
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,271
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
sad cat
@sadcatgamble · 28,032
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 26,471
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 29,241
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,747
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,695
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls · 31,296
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Meta caller
@metacaller · 42,513
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
GS Memecoins (Public)
@degenwar · 23,749
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 33,568
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,315
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 95 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iced's House of Degeneracy” (@houseofdegeneracy), 36,984 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/houseofdegeneracy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.