Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net +374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,945–8,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 14:50
8,397
-9
31 Oct 2026, 07:45
8,406
-8
28 Oct 2026, 03:47
8,414
-9
25 Oct 2026, 06:54
8,423
-10
21 Oct 2026, 20:08
8,433
-6
18 Oct 2026, 06:46
8,439
-11
14 Oct 2026, 20:46
8,450
+3
11 Oct 2026, 22:59
8,447
-21
5 Oct 2026, 17:58
8,468
-24
28 Sept 2026, 10:19
8,492
-30
18 Sept 2026, 20:21
8,522
-11
14 Sept 2026, 05:59
8,533
-7
10 Sept 2026, 20:36
8,540
+448
6 Sept 2026, 01:02
8,092
+44
1 Sept 2026, 20:25
8,048
+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:49
8,046
+2
27 Aug 2026, 14:08
8,044
-13
24 Aug 2026, 05:56
8,057
+3
20 Aug 2026, 07:03
8,054
-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:34
8,055
first reading
Engagement
92 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 8,397 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.478%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 92 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held
92 (1 August 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total
7,737
Reactions total
37
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
792
Videos
32
Links
559
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
599 reactions across 81 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
181
30.2%
🤣
77
12.9%
😁
68
11.4%
😭
57
9.52%
🔥
40
6.68%
🤡
39
6.51%
👍
35
5.84%
💩
22
3.67%
💔
15
2.50%
👎
12
2.00%
💯
9
1.50%
🤔
7
1.17%
😢
5
0.835%
🐳
4
0.668%
👀
4
0.668%
🗿
4
0.668%
👏
3
0.501%
🤝
3
0.501%
😎
2
0.334%
🤮
2
0.334%
9 further kinds
10
1.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
that was my biggest complaint about the app ... trading crosschain especially with so many tech coins using hooks, etc., it was impossible to get fills
so far buying something on robinhood w/ sol in the app was confirmed about as fast as it does for me when buying sol coins
shit's not even on coingecko or coinmarketcap i can't even price check it in groups and safetrade doesn't have copy image so i just have to snip tool the chart and then post it everywhere
bought a bunch of $NOID on safetrade ... it's up a lot in the last 2 weeks, but it's still sitting at 3.7m marketcap
proof of work quantum resistant L1
https://safetrade.com/exchange/NOID-USDT
dev:
https://x.com/ignotus_nemo
bullposts:
https://x.com/search?q=%24noid&src=typed_query
orderbooks are super thin better to enter via bids
grabbed some $OCTO on solana — will write more about it later, but I think it's a good coin that makes sense to run on Solana given there's just more volume and more arb volume to feed the pools than there is on RH right now (for those drawing comparisons to SHROOM)
GoADAwux19tGxb3W4ykPzZz8p5JCSYaxBRpuW7s9pump
one coin is spacex mascot the other coin is a humiliation ritual
😭4😁1
Signed pwnlord69
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @pwnlord. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cooker's Cooks @CookersCooks · 18,799 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
SolidTradesz 堅固 @solidtradesz · 23,753 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
Profits Winning Ground @ProfitsPlays · 25,736 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Trader Mayne’s TA @officialtradermayne · 26,262 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Qwerty's Quants @QwertysQuants · 22,617 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Brozinkers @brozinkers · 52,472 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Prints Printing Press @printspress · 18,846 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe @CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,044 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Zoomer News @ZoomerfiedNews · 22,598 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Solstice’s moonshots @solsticesmoonshots · 27,790 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc @jojiinnercircle · 19,384 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy @houseofdegeneracy · 36,681 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝 @J7tradingjournal · 20,825 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Crypto Narratives @cryptonarratives1 · 21,657 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
Alpha @marketsAlpha · 24,962 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
eezzy’s journal @eezzyjournal · 40,169 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
infinityhedge @infinityhedge · 45,471 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Kirby Crypto @kirbycrypto · 37,987 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
OverDose Gems Calls @overdose_gems_calls · 47,320 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom” (@pwnlord), 8,397 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pwnlord.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.