Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom

Channel

Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom

@pwnlord

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,397subscribers

+374 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002002976235
TypeChannel
Username@pwnlord
DescriptionThe Kingdom YEET: https://yeet.com/register?aff=betmore Terminal: https://trade.padre.gg/rk/pwnlord69 Shuriken: https://t.me/ShurikenTradeBot?start=ref-pwnlord69
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pwnlord

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,0238,5408,281.57 August 2026 — 8,023 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,023 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,053 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,072 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,055 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,054 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,057 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,044 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,046 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,048 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,092 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,540 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,533 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,522 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,492 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,468 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,447 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,450 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,439 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,433 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,423 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,414 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,406 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,397 subscribers8,3977 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net +374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,945–8,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 14:508,397-9
31 Oct 2026, 07:458,406-8
28 Oct 2026, 03:478,414-9
25 Oct 2026, 06:548,423-10
21 Oct 2026, 20:088,433-6
18 Oct 2026, 06:468,439-11
14 Oct 2026, 20:468,450+3
11 Oct 2026, 22:598,447-21
5 Oct 2026, 17:588,468-24
28 Sept 2026, 10:198,492-30
18 Sept 2026, 20:218,522-11
14 Sept 2026, 05:598,533-7
10 Sept 2026, 20:368,540+448
6 Sept 2026, 01:028,092+44
1 Sept 2026, 20:258,048+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:498,046+2
27 Aug 2026, 14:088,044-13
24 Aug 2026, 05:568,057+3
20 Aug 2026, 07:038,054-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:348,055first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 8,397 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.478%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held92 (1 August 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total7,737
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
792
Videos
32
Links
559

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

599 reactions across 81 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18130.2%
🤣7712.9%
😁6811.4%
😭579.52%
🔥406.68%
🤡396.51%
👍355.84%
💩223.67%
💔152.50%
👎122.00%
💯91.50%
🤔71.17%
😢50.835%
🐳40.668%
👀40.668%
🗿40.668%
👏30.501%
🤝30.501%
😎20.334%
🤮20.334%
9 further kinds101.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

21 Oct 2026, 21:10 UTC987 views15 reactionsread 4 November 2026

that was my biggest complaint about the app ... trading crosschain especially with so many tech coins using hooks, etc., it was impossible to get fills so far buying something on robinhood w/ sol in the app was confirmed about as fast as it does for me when buying sol coins

😭5❤3🤡3💩2😁2

Signed pwnlord69

21 Oct 2026, 21:04 UTC≈1,030 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026

their new relayer update is actually insanely fast ... trading crosschain super smooth experience so far

🤡3❤2😭2💩1😁1

Signed pwnlord69

20 Oct 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,260 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026

shit's not even on coingecko or coinmarketcap i can't even price check it in groups and safetrade doesn't have copy image so i just have to snip tool the chart and then post it everywhere

🔥2

Signed pwnlord69

17 Oct 2026, 19:36 UTC≈1,650 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

bought a bunch of $NOID on safetrade ... it's up a lot in the last 2 weeks, but it's still sitting at 3.7m marketcap proof of work quantum resistant L1 https://safetrade.com/exchange/NOID-USDT dev: https://x.com/ignotus_nemo bullposts: https://x.com/search?q=%24noid&src=typed_query orderbooks are super thin better to enter via bids

❤4

Signed pwnlord69

16 Oct 2026, 23:52 UTC≈1,540 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

pump.fun/join/pwnlord69 https://x.com/pwnlord69/status/2111243294558634094?s=20 idk man shit keeps formatting weird this is my ref link please use it

🔥3🗿1

Signed pwnlord69

4 Oct 2026, 02:30 UTC≈2,140 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026

well, if you liked $OCTO at 6m you'll love it here at 1.6m

😁9🤡6💩4🤣4🤔1🤝1😱1

Signed pwnlord69

3 Oct 2026, 01:08 UTC≈1,890 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁2❤1

Signed pwnlord69

2 Oct 2026, 23:23 UTC≈1,950 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026

grabbed some $OCTO on solana — will write more about it later, but I think it's a good coin that makes sense to run on Solana given there's just more volume and more arb volume to feed the pools than there is on RH right now (for those drawing comparisons to SHROOM) GoADAwux19tGxb3W4ykPzZz8p5JCSYaxBRpuW7s9pump

❤3🤡2💩1🤣1

Signed pwnlord69

30 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC≈2,140 views30 reactionsread 4 November 2026

need a new meta before I blow my fucking brains out some of yall are my friends but holy FUCK save the ammo on yalls shills for actually good coins

❤11😭7🐳3👍2🤮2🏆1👀1💔1

Signed pwnlord69

26 Sept 2026, 21:10 UTC≈2,610 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026

modelo and college football time

😁3❤1

Signed pwnlord69

26 Sept 2026, 21:10 UTC≈2,570 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

one coin is spacex mascot the other coin is a humiliation ritual

😭4😁1

Signed pwnlord69

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @pwnlord. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cooker's Cooks
@CookersCooks · 18,799
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
SolidTradesz 堅固
@solidtradesz · 23,753
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,736
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Trader Mayne’s TA
@officialtradermayne · 26,262
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,617
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,472
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,846
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,044
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Zoomer News
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,598
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,790
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,384
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,681
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝
@J7tradingjournal · 20,825
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Crypto Narratives
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,657
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
Alpha
@marketsAlpha · 24,962
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,169
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
infinityhedge
@infinityhedge · 45,471
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Kirby Crypto
@kirbycrypto · 37,987
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,320
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom” (@pwnlord), 8,397 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pwnlord.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.