This channel calls as early as possible new Crypto DEFI gems found on Uniswap, ETH, SOL, BASE and more.
Education only, Not Financial advice. DYOR.
Owner : @od_100
My only official socials are:
t.me/overdose_gems_calls
&
x.com/overdose_AI
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -732. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,792–48,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 23:08
47,250
-24
6 Nov 2026, 21:45
47,274
-17
5 Nov 2026, 23:10
47,291
-7
4 Nov 2026, 22:36
47,298
-22
3 Nov 2026, 20:17
47,320
-11
2 Nov 2026, 20:26
47,331
-12
1 Nov 2026, 22:29
47,343
-30
31 Oct 2026, 23:29
47,373
-30
31 Oct 2026, 02:01
47,403
-49
29 Oct 2026, 23:46
47,452
-41
29 Oct 2026, 03:07
47,493
-22
27 Oct 2026, 22:59
47,515
-32
26 Oct 2026, 19:56
47,547
+155
25 Oct 2026, 19:10
47,392
+417
24 Oct 2026, 20:58
46,975
+28
23 Oct 2026, 22:26
46,947
-37
23 Oct 2026, 00:01
46,984
-22
21 Oct 2026, 20:50
47,006
-57
20 Oct 2026, 15:09
47,063
-16
19 Oct 2026, 12:35
47,079
first reading
Engagement
98 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 47,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,850
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.581%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 98 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
98 (8 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
70,770
Reactions total
411
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 00:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,950
Videos
≈27
Links
≈1,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
5,417 reactions across 98 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,493
46.0%
🔥
1,255
23.2%
👍
604
11.2%
🤣
325
6.00%
💯
262
4.84%
😁
107
1.98%
👏
101
1.86%
😭
48
0.886%
🤯
30
0.554%
😢
28
0.517%
👀
25
0.462%
🌭
23
0.425%
👎
23
0.425%
🙏
21
0.388%
🥴
18
0.332%
👌
6
0.111%
🗿
6
0.111%
🥱
6
0.111%
❤🔥
5
0.092%
🫡
5
0.092%
17 further kinds
26
0.48%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
487
across the posts below
Posts paid on
82
of 98 we hold a reading for · 84%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @overdose_gems_calls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 98 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (87.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
I don't think most of you realize just how high the demand for $HYPE actually is,
I took this screenshot today from my pumpfun wallet's perps section ->
Look at the open interest on $HYPE and then look at the 24hr volume,
Higher than almost EVERY OTHER ALT out there (excluding BTC and ETH)..
And this is happening whilst the overall market volume is genuinely a joke (both on chain & on perps).
This is exactly why…
So did we just wake up to the biggest hack in the history of mankind?
This makes the previous Bybit hack ($1.5B) look small...
FFS
==========
⚠️ I'ʟʟ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ DM ʏᴏᴜ |⚠️ ɴᴏ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘ | Nᴏᴛ ꜰɪɴᴀɴᴄɪᴀʟ ᴀᴅᴠɪᴄᴇ. DYOR. Sᴇᴇ ꜰᴜʟʟ Dɪsᴄʟᴀɪᴍᴇʀ
Elon musk is directly engaging on X with tradexyz?
I think that even the biggest fudders can finally agree that $HYPE is one of the best things that ever came out of crypto, with one of the strongest use cases and user bases in the ENTIRE SPACE.
I'm so glad that I've been DCAing into it on my CEX during the bear market and a bit on pf lately..
Finally some real high quality innovation in our space..
(I'm Holding …
Even though we are up ~ 20x since my public pumpfun callout on $PANGEA -> it remains one of the strongest performers amongst the new lowcaps.
If you ask me why, I think there are a few good reasons:
- One of the only utilities that are trying to reduce the number of PvPs (They deploy instantly on all chains, to reduce multi chain pvp)
- It's hard to copy it via vibe coding, so they have less competitors
- It's a re…
Told you I'm gonna see you in the trenches 😉
Even when the market is dry like that there are always oppurtunities and ways to cook, all you gotta do it be locked in.
20x on yesterday's call on my pumpfun account
https://pump.fun/join/Overdose_ai
And many more are coming. Notifications ON my TG (This channel), X and PF.
⚠ NO PAID GROUPS. NO "VIP" groups
=====================
⚠️ I'll never DM you first. No paid gr…
One of the main reasons I've been posting my $PUMP thesis since the deep bear dips is how stupidly strong the business model is.
Even when the trenches were at their absolute WORST,
Even whilst an endless amount of new pads were popping up every day on every chain trying to take a reasonable market share,
$PUMP's revenue kept growing.
And now it's not just the pad anymore,
The trading app keeps expanding with ne…
Slow days in the market are the best days to DCA in majors and bottomed out ALTs while we wait for onchain volume to pick up.
Still keeping my positions on majors like $MET, $JUP, $UNI, $PUMP, $HYPE, $STRK and thinking about adding a bit more to $STONK
In addition to that, I believe that pumpfun's new reward system + new referral program + the shift from rewarding low cap calls to long term calls might actually mov…
Whilst most of my focus is usually onchain and low/mid caps,
Slow times like this are when you should be researching the big alts.
In the last month we caught most of the BIGGEST alt cooks - $MET, $UNI, $PUMP, $HYPE - all printed 2-5x whilst ppl in the trenches were getting chopped up on 20K mc shitters.
And recently as some of u know I've added $STRK to the list.
Their narrative hits on TWO of the biggest fud / …
So are you telling me that while the whole market is BLEEDING our $MET bag is UP 70% ON A SINGLE DAY?
And this is why I made sure to call $MET here on TG, on my X and on my PF account time after time during the lowest levels..
You really gotta understand that you DON'T HAVE TO CHASE new pairs every single day - because most of the time the best pairs are right in front of you, our (and MY) job is to find them at th…
Don't overcomplicate your thesis
Even in this boring slow weekend, $PUMP is able to pull a daily + 20% green candle(!)
Why? Because as I keep saying - the higher the volume is on $SOL, the higher is the revenue on $PUMP..
Now obviously I'm biased cuz I collaborate with PUMP's trading app and trade a lot of new pairs on STONK / PUMP etc - but $PUMP is one of the only platforms that were able to maintain 1-2m daily …
How to keep it simple?
We saw how much volume $AI brought to Robinhood a few weeks ago
Now with $SI going nuts (and IMO $SI will reach 9 fig MC) - a lot of money will flow to $SOL as well
Who's going to win from it?
- First of all look at $STONK, we already see a huge spike in beta launches (and others launched as well) so we can expect the revenue to go up. I'm long here
- $PUMP -> every time SOL is heating up …
No matter how many new launchpads pop up, no matter how many new CEXs or decentralized perps platforms launch,
$HYPE and $PUMP stay on top of the revenue leaderboard both in the bear AND the bull..
That tells you something about how sticky these platforms actually are.
This is exactly why I keep my bullish stance on both of them,
even though we're already up nicely from DCAing them deep in the bear.
I'll keep DC…
❤29🔥9👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @overdose_gems_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈 @teammacnbtc · 32,175 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Euni Calls 🦄 @eunicalls · 28,702 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
D Man @blockchainwhispersbaby · 96,572 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
crash alerts - leverage controllers @crashalerts · 19,043 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
don’t bet the house @dontbetthehouse · 25,552 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Levis Calls @LevisAlpha · 44,757 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Rekt Fencer @rektfencer_threads · 74,923 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Ralph’s Call @ralphscall · 29,134 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe @CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,994 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳 @ihzanswhaleschool · 29,030 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵 @dogendojo · 28,369 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Klarck Alpha @klarck_alpha · 35,431 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
CRYPTO COACH @cryptocoachpro · 31,107 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
Sugar Calls @sugarydick · 33,052 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Crypto Gems 🚀📈🌟 @cryptogems555 · 23,557 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Investigations by ZachXBT @investigations · 111,611 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
Mduz Calls @mduzcalls · 25,195 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
lunarcrushtrendingcrypto @geckolunarcrush · 7 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 October 2026
Maythous Calls @maythouscalls · 35,158 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Ram's Gems Calls ✨ @ramcalls · 39,632 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
IONIC XBT @theionicxbtt · 22,947 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
🐧Dippy Alpha Calls @dippy_calls · 24,225 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Insider Calls @inside_calls · 24,919 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Koroush AK 👁 @koroush_ak_tg · 43,513 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 110 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OverDose Gems Calls” (@overdose_gems_calls), 47,250 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/overdose_gems_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.