Video, posted without a caption
customΒ 53751357225146855012

Channel
@Official_Bull_BNB
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
16,155subscribers
-736 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001632630756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Official_Bull_BNB |
| Description | Perps + Gems π education and motivation. Posts are not financial advice. Twitter -https://twitter.com/bull_bnb https://web3.okx.com/ul/joindex?ref=BULLBNB |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Official_Bull_BNB |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 16,155 | -10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:17 | 16,165 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:31 | 16,175 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:19 | 16,183 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 16,192 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 16,201 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 16,211 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 16,216 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 16,224 | -21 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 16,245 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 16,254 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 16,262 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:14 | 16,268 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:58 | 16,277 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 16,283 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 16,292 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 16,300 | -17 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:38 | 16,317 | -12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 16,329 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 16,342 | first reading |
208 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 208 (1 August 2026 β 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,412 |
| Reactions total | 261 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 04:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
1,395 reactions across 193 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 614 | 44.0% | |
| π₯ | 294 | 21.1% | |
| customΒ 5375135722514685501 | 169 | 12.1% | |
| π | 149 | 10.7% | |
| π | 54 | 3.87% | |
| π₯° | 36 | 2.58% | |
| π | 24 | 1.72% | |
| β‘ | 20 | 1.43% | |
| π | 20 | 1.43% | |
| π³ | 15 | 1.08% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Video, posted without a caption
customΒ 53751357225146855012
Once upon a time, a guy bought every shovel in town for 50 cents each. Then he went out to a lake, buried a bottle full of gold, dug it up, and ran back into town screaming, βHOLY FUCK, THERE'S GOLD OUT THERE!β The whole town went crazy. Everyone wanted to dig for gold. But guess what? Every shovel was now selling for $15, and he owned them all. He didn't need to mine a single ounce of gold. He made his fortune sβ¦
β€4
Gm fam. So I was on a call with a friend yesterday. Boy got fully liquidated on trump long. He was not answering for 1 hour I was like I hope he is safe and all. Guess what Boy was jerking off like 3 times. I was skeptical but then I saw this post and it makes sense. I guess if your whole world is on fire then cuming and self help can be a therapy
π³7β€2π2π₯1
Here's what users are agreeing to β’ Users bear the trading risks, including losses, rugs and technical failures. β’ Pump can suspend or restrict access and withhold certain rewards. β’ Platform fees can change without prior notice. β’ Creator fees can be redirected under certain conditions. β’ Wallet activity, IP addresses and device information can be monitored. β’ Mystery Packs can be purchased using USDC, with ranβ¦
β€4π1
Lol democrats got elected and punpfun updated its policy asap and most of you wont read it but trust me its funny as fuck leme share what they want you to agree on. So before clicking u know what u are signing up for. Am sure fomo will do the dame
π3customΒ 53751357225146855013
Not gonna lie, watching Trump take an L feels strangely satisfying. π Ever since this man came into office, I haven't made a single fucking dollar in profit. I don't know if this guy was a president or a fucking mosquito repellent coil. π Loss after loss after loss. This shit just never ends. I was actually looking forward to that $5,000 airdrop for Americans. At least some liquidity would've entered the market. β¦
π15β€6π5π³2customΒ 53751357225146855012π₯1
So no 5k to every American? Trump lost π I guess its good for crypto coz Mr Crypto president since got in the office is abosutely rapeing us
π12β€9π₯3
We made greed look like ambition and gambling look like investing. Then we wonder why everyone is so fucking angry. Maybe the problem isn't that people can't handle losing money. It's that we taught them to feel poor even when they're winning. Let it sink in
β€16
Just deleted my degen channel. With apps like Pump.fun, FOMO and all these trading terminals, I don't think separate degen channels serve much purpose anymore..
π30β€9π3π₯2customΒ 53751357225146855011
Luck is favourabke there
π₯6β€3
Download the app and input my referral code Bullbnb! https://pump.fun/u/Bullbnb Join punpfun ASAP Loving the vibe there honestly
https://x.com/bull_bnb/status/2116398200387252695?a=JQ50TjPR4tcGrnY9giM&s=19
Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @Official_Bull_BNB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBULL HOUSE Perps + πβ (@Official_Bull_BNB), 16,155 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Official_Bull_BNB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.