4x for $DOGE-1. Violent candles breaking this up to 700k. Unreal reversal off the 120k dip. Price discovery.

Channel
The Don’s Degens
@degensgems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,169subscribers
-169 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001587879377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @degensgems |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/degensgems |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 15,169 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 15,178 | -49 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 15,227 | -17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 15,244 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 15,257 | -23 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 15,280 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 15,305 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:05 | 15,315 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 15,325 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 15,336 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 15,345 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 15,351 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 15,349 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 15,353 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 15,366 | -21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 15,387 | +159 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 15,228 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 15,247 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 15,261 | -19 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 15,280 | first reading |
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.24%
- avg views ÷ 15,169 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 643
- 45 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 45
- of 101 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 101 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 28,944 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 09s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
40x for $ROBLOXIANS. 6M almost tagged and not stopping. All gas no breaks.
20x for $ROBLOXIANS. 3M tagged and running. Going absolutely parabolic.
8x for $ROBLOXIANS. Tagged 1.1M and looking violent. Speedrunning to 5M. People starting to realize just how huge Roblox is. Cult vibes.
5x for $ROBLOXIANS. Motion on my Roblox.
$ROBLOXIANS ran just shy of 3x this morning. The official Roblox twitter account just replied to their tweet. Catching some nice momentum and volume off the dips. Price discovery incoming. https://x.com/Roblox/status/2095200578121220252
3x for $DOGE-1. We just getting started on this rocket mission. Let's get it.
$DOGE-1 on a blast-off mission. Candling hard here.
$DOGE-1 Doge-1 paired with SPCX. Elon Musk’s satellite blasting into space aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket the first commercial lunar payload in history funded entirely by cryptocurrency, Dogecoin. They are expecting the satellite launch to happen in September. Find entries, 180k. DYOR. https://www.doge1coinrh.com https://x.com/doge1coinrh https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x037dea9a1851a87f997c42cc9bf18659675f6…
2x for $ROBLOXIANS. Starting to get some good momentum off the post launch dip. This could easily be the first stock cult we’ve seen with changing pfp’s. New ATH and moving well so far.
$ROBLOXIANS The Robloxians. The cult of Roblox paired with the Roblox stock on Robinhood. 140k. Degen, DYOR. https://X.com/RobloxiansPage https://t.me/robloxianscult https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x3280b21b63df584e8d4afb8cabd0e031eca1b4f13d64fb06456867b35fd01e07
2x for $SHREK. Still ridiculously undervalued here. Creator is quite literally sending videos. https://x.com/Hester_Studios/status/2094892126391935109?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @degensgems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@degensgems edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CallAnalyser · 49,57413 postsCall Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 26,0005 postsKOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 15,1504 postsThe Don's Calls
@TheDonsCalls · 12,9173 postsDa Vinci Gambles 🃏
@DaVinciGambles · 242 postsApes Central | Where Data Meets Primal Instinct
@ApesCentral · 5871 postCall Analyser (Robinhood Only)
@CallAnalyserRobinhood · 2,2771 postLeak.me Influencer Tracker
@CallTracker · 1,0201 postMagnum Services
@MagnumServices · 41 postDogecoin🐶 - Lp burnt
@newdogeeth · 601 postRóbín Hóòd GEM
@RobinHoodluge · 831 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@TheDonsCalls · 12,9172 postsBaby Shib Portal
@BabyShibToken · 1951 postThe Bull Of Wall Street - Portal
@BullOfWS · 561 post$GTAVI Portal
@GTAVI_Network · 4281 postHe Hua Panda - Entry
@hehuapanda · 2731 postLil BUB
@lilbub_robinhood · 641 postMagic Internet Money
@MagicInternetMoneylol · 171 postSwole Doge Portal
@SwoleDogeTG · 471 postdogwifpants
@thedogwifpants · 2,2501 posttherandombull
@TheRandomBull · 51 postYes, This is Dog - Portal
@yesthisisdogmeme · 251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MetaGambler · 23,467
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
@metacaller · 42,513
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@batman_gem · 22,484
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
@DegenSeals · 34,271
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@MarkDegens · 23,807
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@dr_crypto_channel · 23,056
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
@maythouscalls · 35,747
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@venomcalls · 35,703
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@dogendojo · 35,314
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@veigarcalls · 25,048
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
@watisdes · 30,089
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@brookcalls · 32,782
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@EZMoneyCalls · 26,032
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@CallAnalyserSol · 26,000
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@MaybachCalls · 29,291
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@LionJUNGLE · 33,476
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
@LionCALL · 90,836
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@eunicalls · 29,241
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@arcanegems · 47,229
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Don’s Degens” (@degensgems), 15,169 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degensgems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.