Merry Christmas homies, we jollymaxxing this year 🎅 Sacrificed so much shit for this internet money gotta give it back to the family

Channel
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,607subscribers
-319 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001386723491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @senzu_calls |
| Description | Journal. Sovereign man. https://twitter.com/0xSenzu Nothing I say is financial advice. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/senzu_calls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:08 | 6,607 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 6,615 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 6,626 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 6,639 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 6,653 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:11 | 6,663 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 6,679 | -10 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 05:10 | 6,689 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 6,696 | -31 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 6,727 | -13 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 6,740 | -50 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 6,790 | -18 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 6,808 | -11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:35 | 6,819 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:48 | 6,837 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 6,847 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 6,864 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 6,881 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 6,886 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 6,891 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,350
- Videos
- ≈286
- Links
- ≈2,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
was uncapped mint but now its minting again https://basescan.org/token/0x699727f9e01a822efdcf7333073f0461e5914b4e https://farcaster.xyz/sayangel/0xe7ed6fc2 https://farcaster.xyz/sayangel/0x6c75fb60 theyre debating capping total supply or not but ppl at farcaster are absolutely retarded so wouldn't be surprised if they leave it uncapped which equals gg
https://opensea.io/collection/the-warplets-farcaster im buying these on open sea they're lowk fire 99% chance im donating money
😭🥀
honestly sucks but ought to have op sec around exported private keys, same way you ought to always have a fresh wallet with some money in it like 5-20k incase you're ever robbed in person you can give the robber that and keep the rest of your money
nah jokes aside gg i think if you connected your gmgn wallet to telegram the hacker is able to drain your wallet by apeing into his honeypot
but its always had 0 money
it has 0 money
omg my gmgn wallet
i've been testing out gemmer to try and hit good coins early and its been really useful thus far try it if you like its essentially memescope but shows all chains with more filtering, currently in beta stage dm the owner @iladnashh if you have any questions https://x.com/Gemmer_bot Gemmer.bot
bought sumn on bsc maybe good
gm wall st investors
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @senzu_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @senzu_calls as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 12 months
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arcanegems · 46,709
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@spidersjournal · 32,555
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,044
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
@maythouscalls · 35,180
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@bagcalls · 57,246
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@J7tradingjournal · 20,750
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
@printspress · 18,833
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
@erics_calls · 30,822
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@eezzyjournal · 40,144
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
@primegems · 18,666
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 October 2026
@sugarydick · 33,095
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,016
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@watisdes · 29,897
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
@dogendojo · 28,447
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@PowsGemCalls · 111,253
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@lowtaxethx · 18,533
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
@MetaGambler · 21,869
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
@DegenSeals · 34,194
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@EZMoneyCalls · 22,981
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@metacaller · 41,186
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@venomcalls · 34,832
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@CookersCooks · 18,790
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,820
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,671
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Senzu Calls 🔱” (@senzu_calls), 6,607 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/senzu_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.