Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRIME TRADES 🪐

Channel

PRIME TRADES 🪐

@primegems

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,710subscribers

-3,879 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001863620956
TypeChannel
Username@primegems
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/primegems

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,52022,58920,554.57 August 2026 — 22,589 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,472 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,405 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,231 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,950 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,801 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,785 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,331 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,148 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,812 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,800 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,775 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,670 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,511 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,190 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,963 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,849 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,468 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,309 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,157 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,131 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,074 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,994 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,935 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,868 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,787 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,670 subscribers9 September 2026 — 18,584 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,556 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,532 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,536 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,520 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,605 subscribers26 September 2026 — 18,934 subscribers4 October 2026 — 18,976 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,970 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,879 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,856 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,840 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,834 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,829 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,828 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,746 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,735 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,729 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,724 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,714 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,701 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,679 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,665 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,618 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,589 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,590 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,765 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,754 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,735 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,736 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,710 subscribers18,7107 August 20264 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 89 days, net -3,879. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,910–23,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:3918,710-26
3 Nov 2026, 08:3118,736+1
2 Nov 2026, 04:5118,735-19
1 Nov 2026, 07:0618,754-11
31 Oct 2026, 08:4018,765+175
30 Oct 2026, 08:4518,590+1
29 Oct 2026, 07:4618,589-29
28 Oct 2026, 03:4118,618-47
27 Oct 2026, 01:4718,665-14
25 Oct 2026, 22:2018,679-22
24 Oct 2026, 21:0618,701-13
24 Oct 2026, 00:0418,714-10
22 Oct 2026, 21:5618,724-5
21 Oct 2026, 21:3518,729-6
20 Oct 2026, 14:1618,735-11
19 Oct 2026, 17:3518,746-82
18 Oct 2026, 15:1518,828-1
17 Oct 2026, 16:2718,829-5
16 Oct 2026, 19:1018,834-6
15 Oct 2026, 18:1018,840first reading

Engagement

183 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 18,710 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 183 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held183 (6 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total46,724
Reactions total1,068
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 03:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,072 reactions across 183 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,06438.0%
❤2,61532.4%
🔥1,38817.2%
🏆3183.94%
🙏2653.28%
🦄1571.94%
✍1351.67%
🐳1231.52%
custom 583238498459320648170.087%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 183 of the 183 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,072 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 183 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 183 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @primegems. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 183 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Nov 2026, 01:32 UTC259 views41 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Starting to believe SOL sweeps $84.

👍19❤13🔥4🙏3🦄2

4 Nov 2026, 01:10 UTC565 views40 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Aight so after the bounce and TPs the weakness is coming in hot again. Think the low can be and will be taken out soon. Praying 73-75K will still come that $74.9K low just screams to be taken out. Remember, Swing Lows never come easy! Need a lot of patience for them to form.

👍17❤12🐳5🙏4🦄2

3 Nov 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,330 views41 reactionsread 4 November 2026

It may seem little but while most got hyper scared or even shorted the lows, I said to MAX LONG with conviction and it's up 2% from the entry.

❤19👍13🔥4🙏3🦄2

3 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,310 views47 reactionsread 4 November 2026

My TP1 of that big size from that low has hit at $77.5k Now stops of that position at b/e and comfy. If we lose this low we go 73-75k for our final swing low I reckon.

❤19👍13🔥11🐳3🙏1

3 Nov 2026, 00:37 UTC≈1,580 views48 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Told you we will bounce here Looks good now. :) Higher

👍22❤18🔥4🐳2🦄2

3 Nov 2026, 00:20 UTC≈1,460 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Higher Low here Pretty sure we can bounce back to mid-range around 77.5k

👍21❤11🔥5🐳4🦄3

2 Nov 2026, 20:46 UTC≈1,240 views48 reactionsread 4 November 2026

We will bounce here and squeeze hard very shortly

👍26❤11🔥8🐳2🦄1

2 Nov 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,260 views69 reactionsread 4 November 2026

I want to open a trading group Thought of it so many times only focused on perps

👍34❤18🙏9🔥5🦄3

2 Nov 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,350 views46 reactionsread 4 November 2026

adding heavy size

👍21❤16🦄5🔥3🐳1

2 Nov 2026, 19:51 UTC≈1,650 views45 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Im longing more

👍23❤13🐳4🙏3🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC≈13,500 views45 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Im adding to longs here

👍22❤13🔥4🐳3🙏3

2 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC760 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Brent Crude Oil crashes 5% after reports of US and Iran nearing a deal. @WatcherGuru

❤16👍15🔥5🐳3🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 183 posts we hold for @primegems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,936
#1
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,132
#2
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,352
#3
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 25,327
#4
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,790
#5
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,695
#6
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,095
#7
Solstice's Degens
@solsticedegens · 6,833
#8
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,733
#9
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,858
#10
Pyro Trading Journal
@pyrotradingjournal · 14,784
#11
AJM Gems
@AJM1000x · 6,812
#12
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,627
#13
Acid’s Crypto Blog (AcidRainbowHalo)
@Acidonmeliketheraincalls · 3,340
#14
Fomo’s Gambling Gays
@gamblinggays · 10,862
#15
MANIFESTING RICHES
@manifestingriches · 8,768
#16
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,202
#17
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,615
#18
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,299
#19
degnben’s cartel ✍️
@degenBENPLAYS · 2,559
#20
Prerich lobby by mememe 💸
@prerichlobby69 · 6,670
#21
based kook calls
@hellokook · 15,967
#22
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 31,006
#23
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,212
#24
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,178
#25
DegenDan PLAYS
@DegenDanPlays · 3,682
#26
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,512
#27
halt moves
@haltmoves · 5,038
#28
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,051
#29
Mr B Temple ⛩️
@MrBTemple · 9,859
#30
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,750
#31
BIG BOB GEMBLE (DR. TRENCH)
@bigbobgamble · 1,172
#32
Dylan’s Degens 🧼
@dylansdegens · 11,546
#33
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,302
#34
Diary of Rory
@diaryofrory · 1,359
#35
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,055
#36
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,170
#37
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 15,766
#38
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,320
#39
Cooker's Cooks
@CookersCooks · 18,796
#40
Kenny Degen Journal
@KennyCryptoWorld · 1,534
#41
Ev's Alphas
@HardSnipe · 11,693
#42
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,178
#43
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 97,451
#44
wuzie makes money
@wuziemakesmoney · 8,863
#45
Klutch Trades
@klutchtrades · 4,429
#46
goodmans journal
@solgoodmancalls · 7,870
#47
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,161
#48
Affu Calls
@affucalls · 6,862
#49
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,773
#50
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,215
#51
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 46,772
#52
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,418
#53
FAST's PALACE
@fastspalace · 3,157
#54
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 630,948
#55
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,587
#56
goodmans gambas
@solgoodmansdegeneracy · 1,620
#57
wat is des
@watisdes · 29,916
#58
Evee cook’s ❄️
@ghastlygems · 14,648
#59
Catolicc's Oil Money
@catolicc100x · 10,932
#60
Ottie Labs | Memecoins • Sports Bets • NFTs
@insidersenclave · 3,465
#61
Xander's Trenches
@xanderstrenches · 11,065
#62
Cold Capital ❄️
@ColdCapital · 4,377
#63
Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,588
#64
Aliaian's Research
@alisresearch · 4,659
#65
Whomp World
@whompworld · 2,699
#66
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,586
#67
$hills Dollar Menu (Daily Trading Journal)
@TheIllestShills · 4,952
#68
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,475
#69
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 14,183
#70
Affu Gamble
@AffuGamble · 1,359
#71
yelo's degen log
@yeloalfa · 10,571
#72
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 77,798
#73
KOL Trending (@CallAnalyser)
@walloftrophies · 16,258
#74
Walta’s Calls
@waltacalls · 2,371
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 25,327
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,132
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,790
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,302
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝
@J7tradingjournal · 20,825
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 31,006
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,695
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,178
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
WizCalls
@Wizzzzcallsss · 14,238
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 September 2026
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,858
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,202
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Call Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 27,182
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,352
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,397
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,178
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 28,025
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 27,681
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 45,300
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Renzos Degen Alpha
@degenrenzo · 18,634
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
Zelfiguru.pro copytrade blog
@Zelfiguru_blog_eng · 24,322
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 58,433
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,627
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,418
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Maybach Calls
@MaybachCalls · 31,947
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRIME TRADES 🪐” (@primegems), 18,710 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/primegems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.