im not saying buy shit at ATH’s but also don’t wait for -70% golden entries specially on robinhood chain, every fast dip ON GOOD PROVEN coins is free money and risk reward is worth it while it has this much momentum

Channel
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,814subscribers
+326 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002089676082 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jojiinnercircle |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jojiinnercircle |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 19,814 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 19,836 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 19,846 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 19,860 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:45 | 19,863 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 19,856 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 19,854 | +14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 19,840 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 19,848 | +22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 19,826 | +48 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 19,778 | +25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 19,753 | +149 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 19,604 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 19,615 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 19,624 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 19,625 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 19,624 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 19,620 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 19,619 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 19,612 | first reading |
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 13 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.46%
- avg views ÷ 19,814 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,680
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (13 September 2025 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,890 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
this is the how you’ll make the most money and the how you’ll also keep most of it if you make enough early to fuck off you won’t need to be here through the bear scraping slop 100k toppers
early bull - hold uncomfortable bags max risk on you have a thousand shots to roundtrip and make less than you had at your bag’s top while always taking some TP late bull - keep shaving aggressively and ride smaller moonbags
don’t be the nigga that is too smart early in the bull that calls every top just to be the last nigga holding fat bags when everything is going to shit
read this 500 billion times if you need it
https://x.com/metaversejoji/status/2091716124433866867?s=46
made a pump account so i can also call coins there keep in mind that coins i call there are not taken as serious as the ones i call here, which i take a lot longer to vet and reassure that i think you will be making guaranteed money in most times that's gonna be more lower mcap gambles https://join.pump.fun/HSag/vv4lu7oa
chat channel so you can reply to whatever i post https://t.me/+sAnW_iZrsuNkZWM0
deleted the come up gonna just post here now make sure u got notis
Achievement Unlocked: x8! ⚡️ @comeupnigga made a x8+ call on b-money. $304K ➡️ $2.5M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!
Achievement Unlocked: x5! 👋 @comeupnigga made a x5+ call on this is not a w.... $142K ➡️ $738K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!
deleted my side channels, will only post here from now on -10K ppl on there at a certain point i had 30-35k ppl here but i t old them to switch to diff channels for useless shit gonna be grinding this one only forever and not diverse idc bout seperate channels for lowcaps its a bull market im gonna shill whatever i think goes up and you do whatever the fuck you want let's cook niggers
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @jojiinnercircle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@jojiinnercircle named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 10 posts, 8 August 2026 – 29 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,696
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
@LevisAlpha · 46,035
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@ramcalls · 41,195
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
@shahlito · 32,059
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
@bilbiamtengarsadinha · 114,856
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 6 September 2026
@cieloannouncements · 49,393
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,895
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@Corvo_bets · 42,596
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,463
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@renzosalpha · 84,169
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
@teammacnbtc · 33,244
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“joji innercircle - comeback arc” (@jojiinnercircle), 19,814 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jojiinnercircle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.