https://twitter.com/100xgemfinder
Sharing my highest conviction plays
For Inquiries: @x100xgemfinder
Don't fall for scams click the name above to verify it's actually me.
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -749. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,765–24,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 06:37
23,000
-14
6 Nov 2026, 07:38
23,014
-10
5 Nov 2026, 10:41
23,024
-22
4 Nov 2026, 09:40
23,046
-21
3 Nov 2026, 10:17
23,067
-15
2 Nov 2026, 06:49
23,082
-14
1 Nov 2026, 07:30
23,096
-10
31 Oct 2026, 09:40
23,106
-5
30 Oct 2026, 11:27
23,111
-6
29 Oct 2026, 10:57
23,117
-6
28 Oct 2026, 11:26
23,123
-8
27 Oct 2026, 07:55
23,131
-10
26 Oct 2026, 09:06
23,141
-17
25 Oct 2026, 07:55
23,158
-21
24 Oct 2026, 06:27
23,179
-17
23 Oct 2026, 04:09
23,196
-18
22 Oct 2026, 07:20
23,214
-29
20 Oct 2026, 22:35
23,243
-18
19 Oct 2026, 20:37
23,261
-20
18 Oct 2026, 23:09
23,281
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.38%
avg views ÷ 23,000 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,700
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
54 (25 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
16,976
Reactions total
247
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 02:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
433
Videos
13
Links
607
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,058 reactions across 54 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,302
63.3%
🔥
315
15.3%
❤🔥
94
4.57%
⚡
85
4.13%
👍
50
2.43%
🍾
34
1.65%
🐳
32
1.55%
🥰
28
1.36%
😁
25
1.21%
🤩
21
1.02%
😎
14
0.68%
👀
13
0.632%
😈
8
0.389%
💯
7
0.34%
🕊
6
0.292%
🎉
5
0.243%
🏆
5
0.243%
🤗
5
0.243%
🫡
5
0.243%
😇
4
0.194%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,058 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (30.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
If I make referral rewards insanely generous (you guys make more than the top creators in crypto such as Orangie, Ansem, etc) for onboarding users to Gembot.io trading (we will have SOL and Robinhood and all tokenized pairs at fastest speeds on the market)
Would you guys be enticed by that? Would you become shill masters? Need honest thoughts
Is this pumpfun criming or is this organic real volume and are we about to see memecoin trading pick back up? let me know
https://x.com/100xgemfinder/status/2117742023344328784?s=46&t=E4giYcspoU1vBuJJFa9Rcg
The top paper trader is up $31K with an 88% win rate so far. We are releasing a paper trading leaderboard soon and will be doing tournaments to see who the top trader is with good rewards.
I’m excited to see all the people training their memecoin trading skills using Gembot.io (for absolutely free) and then see those results translate to real money trading.
Highly recommend giving it a shot, always open to any feed…
Heaters is live on gembot.io
Free users can now find early, higher-upside plays that pass our algo checks. Not every coin will run, but this gives you a shot at finding organic runners early.
premium gets an upgraded version of this, but this is immense value to give away for free
As the market heats up, this will be a weapon.
Paper trading rewards are also live. Log in daily to earn more free trading balance.
473 users have signed up or logged in to claim their free $10,000 bonus for paper trading!
27 slots remain, after that point it grants only $2,500.
How are you guys liking paper trading? a lot of big updates coming for free to offer you guys free alpha, as well as rewards just for logging in.
Lots of awesome stuff in the works. going to make sure we're all prepared for the next run which guaranteed happens in nove…
Almost all 500 spots have been taken to get free $10,000 added. whoever joins after gets $2,500 added to their balance for free.
More stuff on the way for paper trading - leader boards (like fomo, but much more detail)
referral rewards
and tournaments where you win free stuff
All I ask is raid the hell out of the tweet, and support us! We’re trying to build a product that truly helps people and we have a lot of s…
I’ve wanted to change the game for a long time. It’s finally here.
$10,000 to the first 500 people to sign up
https://x.com/gembotio/status/2111847769266667849?s=46&t=E4giYcspoU1vBuJJFa9Rcg
haven't made a call for a coin in many many months. but i have found a coin that I think has high upside, and i'm genuinely surprised that it is this low.
the last coins i called were cashcat (300M MC at peak) and 4663 (8.2M MC at peak)
I only call stuff when i genuinely think it has potential to gigasend which is why i rarely call coins to begin with in a market where 20,000 of them come out a day.
question is sh…
5/5 this week on precision calls
100% on 2.3x+ with a 16.9x in there
63% on 2x+ on Conservative calls this MONTH on 24 calls
No KOL is better than this. Nothing out there is more of a miracle than this, and we're only just getting started.
Trading for everyone is going to be live soon, auto trading possibly for everyone, or might be a premium feature only.
Autotrader/gembot trading on the platform in beta now fo…
❤28🔥13
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @x100xcallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @x100xcallz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@FINDERTRENDING 💎 @findertrending · 26,491 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
Ram's Gems Calls ✨ @ramcalls · 39,597 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
crash alerts - leverage controllers @crashalerts · 19,043 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Blessed labs 𓃵 @Blessedmemecalls · 24,099 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“100x Calls 💎” (@x100xcallz), 23,000 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x100xcallz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.