Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gake’s Bakes

Channel

Gake’s Bakes

@GakesBakes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,640subscribers

-242 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040892468
TypeChannel
Username@GakesBakes
Descriptiongmgn: https://gmgn.ai/r/gake Trojan: https://t.me/menelaus_trojanbot?start=r-gakeyyy X: @Ga__ke Discussions here are not financial advice, Ape at own risk. No other TG Chat.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/GakesBakes

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,64026,88826,7647 August 2026 — 26,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,881 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,888 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,886 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,887 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,883 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,881 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,870 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,851 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,850 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,844 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,843 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,838 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,885 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,878 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,873 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,875 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,874 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,876 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,881 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,874 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,864 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,859 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,864 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,852 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,845 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,836 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,815 subscribers14 September 2026 — 26,807 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,801 subscribers19 September 2026 — 26,786 subscribers25 September 2026 — 26,746 subscribers4 October 2026 — 26,816 subscribers8 October 2026 — 26,789 subscribers13 October 2026 — 26,759 subscribers14 October 2026 — 26,739 subscribers15 October 2026 — 26,731 subscribers16 October 2026 — 26,726 subscribers17 October 2026 — 26,718 subscribers18 October 2026 — 26,709 subscribers19 October 2026 — 26,693 subscribers21 October 2026 — 26,680 subscribers22 October 2026 — 26,672 subscribers23 October 2026 — 26,663 subscribers24 October 2026 — 26,659 subscribers25 October 2026 — 26,645 subscribers26 October 2026 — 26,640 subscribers7 August 202626 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net -242. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,603–26,925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 05:5026,640-5
25 Oct 2026, 07:1926,645-14
24 Oct 2026, 05:4726,659-4
23 Oct 2026, 04:2726,663-9
22 Oct 2026, 05:2626,672-8
21 Oct 2026, 00:1626,680-13
19 Oct 2026, 22:2926,693-16
18 Oct 2026, 19:4526,709-9
17 Oct 2026, 22:0526,718-8
16 Oct 2026, 18:3526,726-5
15 Oct 2026, 17:1026,731-8
14 Oct 2026, 15:5526,739-20
13 Oct 2026, 04:1926,759-30
8 Oct 2026, 23:1826,789-27
4 Oct 2026, 12:1626,816+70
25 Sept 2026, 22:1626,746-40
19 Sept 2026, 05:0026,786-15
16 Sept 2026, 20:3526,801-6
14 Sept 2026, 20:3626,807-8
13 Sept 2026, 04:3926,815first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 26,640 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,190
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held32 (28 May 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total14,370
Reactions total206
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Oct 2026, 09:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈415
Videos
≈49
Links
≈1,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,280 reactions across 30 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤67129.4%
😭38817.0%
🤣30113.2%
👎1506.58%
👍1416.18%
🔥944.12%
💯813.55%
🤡733.20%
😁612.68%
🥰421.84%
🤮351.54%
🤬241.05%
👏220.965%
🖕220.965%
💩210.921%
✍160.702%
🙉110.482%
💔90.395%
🤯90.395%
🥴90.395%
30 further kinds1004.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 30 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GakesBakes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC≈9,640 views33 reactionsread 26 October 2026

Don’t think we get these back sadly

😭21❤6😢4👍2

1 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC≈4,730 views173 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Forwarded from @idrawlineTG

i really miss memecoins i hate buying the 12th vamp of a stock paired bundled scam because "this is the one" obv this is the meta and there's money to be made etc etc but once you understand that the meta is basically set by 2-3 cabals... all im saying is that i wanna buy something without having to think of a narra or whatever think the only coins remaining are neet and tung. maybe a couple more here and there …

💯75❤37👍23🤣13🤡12😭5🥱4🤨2

11 Sept 2026, 06:12 UTC≈10,400 views221 reactions2 Starsread 26 October 2026

by popular demand

❤136🔥33🤣24👍8🤪5🙉5💋3🥰3

28 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈13,300 views161 reactionsread 26 October 2026

i am not on fomo / pump referring to the fake profile of me on fomo *

❤73😭31🤣18😁8👍6🔥5🤝5🤡5

13 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC≈13,800 views113 reactionsread 26 October 2026

There is no perfect trader. In a domain this noisy, perfection isn't a coherent target. The target is a robust process with survivable variance. Chasing perfection is itself a psychological failure mode — it's perfectionism, and it reliably produces overtrading, revenge trading, and an inability to accept the losses that a correct strategy generates by design.

❤80✍16🤡7😭5🤣4🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC≈11,000 views18 reactionsread 26 October 2026

Well copy pastaed onto stonks hahaha - ok not in the same format / tokenomics design but still leveraged positions in a way There is no moat until your pad has any mindshare so game is game Also good to see things managed to get some integration with terminals to increase visibility but uh as per perpspad the difficulty is how to get any mindshare / relevance still https://x.com/thingsmarket/status/208729783109049…

❤5👍5🤡5👎3

9 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC≈8,900 views16 reactionsread 26 October 2026

Same narra but now the pad works and sol is going up amidst people more interested in novel tokenomics and experiments 😊

❤8🔥4🦄3👀1

8 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC≈8,450 views11 reactionsread 26 October 2026

Can’t believe b sol front ran me

😭9❤2

8 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC≈8,700 views65 reactions2 Starsread 26 October 2026
Forwarded from @gemsbybPhoto

reading the whole fomo vs pump fun x timeline

😭35🤣19❤9💔1😇1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @GakesBakes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jul 2026, 06:11 UTCAnonymous Poll1,940 voters approx.

Are you having fun on RH

  1. Wagmi Wagmi wooooo49%
  2. No fuck my chungus life51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Fomo’s Mojo Dojo Casa House
@fomomofosol · 14,344
#1
Ottie Labs | Memecoins • Sports Bets • NFTs
@insidersenclave · 3,482
#2
Fomo’s Gambling Gays
@gamblinggays · 10,907
#3
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,678
#4
666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,609
#5
MANIFESTING RICHES
@manifestingriches · 8,816
#6
bry’s degens
@printingcabal · 2,445
#7
Sung’s Exit Liquidity
@sungsgroup · 1,635
#8
goodmans journal
@solgoodmancalls · 7,906
#9
goodmans gambas
@solgoodmansdegeneracy · 1,627
#10
Whomp World
@whompworld · 2,713
#11
Solstice's Degens
@solsticedegens · 6,841
#12
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 39,945
#13
Aroa's Journal
@AroasJournal · 2,961
#14
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,203
#15
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,258
#16
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,277
#17
Xander's Trenches
@xanderstrenches · 11,124
#18
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,727
#19
Klutch Trades
@klutchtrades · 4,455
#20
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,985
#21
GT27 Journal
@gtcalls · 1,696
#22
AJM Gems
@AJM1000x · 6,846
#23
wuzie makes money
@wuziemakesmoney · 8,899
#24
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,573
#25
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,785
#26
Catolicc's Oil Money
@catolicc100x · 11,212
#27
Youmin Cook 🥷🥷🥷
@youmin88341 · 4,975
#28
yelo's degen log
@yeloalfa · 10,620
#29
Robo Calls
@robogems · 17,266
#30
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,430
#31
Cold Capital ❄️
@ColdCapital · 4,385
#32
Solshotta's Hitters
@solshotta · 4,582
#33
Sage’s Degen Trenches
@sagextrenches · 4,537
#34
Wmafia Gems
@WmafiaGems · 9,328
#35
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,808
#36
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,763
#37
Lexapro’s Feed
@lexaprosfeed · 13,241
#38
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,643
#39
江峰日记 Gem's🧲
@JFRJ0x · 5,030
#40
ThroneBorn
@ThroneBorn · 1,266
#41
Patty's Trap House
@pattystraphouse · 2,822
#42
earl trades journal
@MarketMilkerSOL · 4,813
#43
1000x💎 Gambles
@gem1000xgruop · 10,529
#44
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,218
#45
Code Calls
@code_calls · 941
#46
Shackpots
@shackpots · 3,665
#47
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,211
#48
Aymoryfun
@Aymoryfun · 6,513
#49
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,756
#50
Profitierr
@profitierrr · 6,475
#51
DogenMan|🎯
@DogenManREAL · 1,913
#52
Trenches Bunker
@RektNFA · 9,297
#53
Wolfgmi Journal 📝
@wolfgmi · 910
#54
Affu Calls
@affucalls · 6,919
#55
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,755
#56
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,391
#57
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 18,679
#58
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,924
#59
Legend Call’s
@legends_call · 4,097
#60
SOL聪明钱监控BOT
@Shanxunjiankong · 7,627
#61
based kook calls
@hellokook · 16,008
#62
World 100x calls
@worldcalls · 3,437
#63
鼹鼠 call 🔥🐲🔥2026来财版
@cryptomole0 · 9,514
#64
旧亿 call
@jiuyicall · 11,571
#65
来钱CALL
@eth200000000 · 7,025
#66
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,533
#67
落魄山-gamble🎲
@gs97z1 · 2,486
#68
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,483
#69
Fencun 分享频道
@Fencun_call · 3,231
#70

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cooker's Cooks
@CookersCooks · 18,850
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,678
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 39,945
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,258
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 80,558
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
100x Calls 💎
@x100xcallz · 23,141
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,277
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,573
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Cielo Announcements
@cieloannouncements · 43,423
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
方程式新闻 BWEnews
@BWEnews · 72,250
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,756
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 September 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 47,009
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,476
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Renzos Degen Alpha
@degenrenzo · 18,749
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 30,849
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,785
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 26,666
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,643
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 83,146
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 18,679
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 October 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 26,292
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,211
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
shah’s trading journal
@shahlito · 31,178
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,727
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gake’s Bakes” (@GakesBakes), 26,640 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GakesBakes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.