Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gake’s Bakes

Channel

Gake’s Bakes

@GakesBakes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,836subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040892468
TypeChannel
Username@GakesBakes
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GakesBakes

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,83626,88826,8627 August 2026 — 26,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,881 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,888 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,886 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,887 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,883 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,881 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,870 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,851 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,850 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,844 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,843 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,838 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,885 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,878 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,873 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,875 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,874 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,876 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,881 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,874 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,864 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,859 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,864 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,852 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,845 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,836 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 35 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,828–26,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 07:1826,836-9
8 Sept 2026, 10:3726,845-7
5 Sept 2026, 04:5826,852-12
3 Sept 2026, 10:1226,864+5
2 Sept 2026, 06:5326,859-5
1 Sept 2026, 06:1226,864-10
31 Aug 2026, 04:3526,874-7
30 Aug 2026, 02:2526,881+5
29 Aug 2026, 03:4326,876+2
28 Aug 2026, 06:3426,874-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:1926,875+2
26 Aug 2026, 08:4826,873-5
25 Aug 2026, 06:4226,878-7
24 Aug 2026, 06:0426,885+47
22 Aug 2026, 12:3326,838-5
20 Aug 2026, 23:2426,843-1
19 Aug 2026, 03:2426,844-6
18 Aug 2026, 00:0226,850-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:0326,851-19
13 Aug 2026, 23:2626,870first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 26,836 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,420
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.989%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held28 (28 May 202628 August 2026)
Views total25,680
Reactions total254
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,807 reactions across 27 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46125.5%
😭35519.6%
🤣26214.5%
👎1498.25%
👍1085.98%
😁613.38%
🔥603.32%
🤡603.32%
🥰392.16%
🤮351.94%
🤬241.33%
🖕221.22%
👏211.16%
💩211.16%
150.83%
🤯90.498%
🥴90.498%
🌭80.443%
💔80.443%
🦄70.387%
25 further kinds734.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,807 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 27 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GakesBakes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈4,040 views135 reactionsread 3 September 2026

i am not on fomo / pump referring to the fake profile of me on fomo *

54😭27🤣17😁8👍6🍌5🔥5💩4

13 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC≈7,250 views106 reactionsread 3 September 2026

There is no perfect trader. In a domain this noisy, perfection isn't a coherent target. The target is a robust process with survivable variance. Chasing perfection is itself a psychological failure mode — it's perfectionism, and it reliably produces overtrading, revenge trading, and an inability to accept the losses that a correct strategy generates by design.

7515🤡7😭5🤣3🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC≈6,860 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Well copy pastaed onto stonks hahaha - ok not in the same format / tokenomics design but still leveraged positions in a way There is no moat until your pad has any mindshare so game is game Also good to see things managed to get some integration with terminals to increase visibility but uh as per perpspad the difficulty is how to get any mindshare / relevance still https://x.com/thingsmarket/status/208729783109049

👍5🤡54👎2

9 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC≈6,810 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Same narra but now the pad works and sol is going up amidst people more interested in novel tokenomics and experiments 😊

8🔥4🦄3👀1

8 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC≈6,810 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Can’t believe b sol front ran me

😭92

8 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC≈6,780 views62 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @gemsbybPhoto

reading the whole fomo vs pump fun x timeline

😭33🤣198💔1😇1

7 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC≈6,550 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

19🤓6👎1🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈6,460 views94 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Mitch lied.

🤣58😭157👎4😁4🤡3💘2🤬1

6 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈6,720 views108 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

things looking better on chain, hopefully it continues to get more abundant for everybody regardless of whatever chain you're on and best of luck! I do think somewhere along the way with how dead / pvp on chain was I became less of a dreamer; which paradoxically made me miss / midcurve coins for an extended period as well - but maybe just maybe its still important to always try to make the bull/bear case for any/eve

78👍11🔥8🖕3😭3👎2🤣2🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈6,420 views97 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

it appears many of you like the pfp

👎24🖕1917🤮13👍8🤣5🤡3🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @GakesBakes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Jul 2026, 06:11 UTCAnonymous Poll1,920 voters approx.

Are you having fun on RH

  1. Wagmi Wagmi wooooo50%
  2. No fuck my chungus life50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 41,195
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,675
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 82,564
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,463
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,696
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Cielo Announcements
@cieloannouncements · 49,393
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
方程式新闻 BWEnews
@BWEnews · 72,880
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 46,035
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 33,521
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,483
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 33,047
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 84,169
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 27,610
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,852
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Shah’s Calls
@shahlito · 32,059
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 113,274
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
大宇投资频道
@BTCdayu2 · 30,090
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 37,017
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 54,319
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 37,423
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gake’s Bakes” (@GakesBakes), 26,836 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GakesBakes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.