Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for goodmans journal

Channel

goodmans journal

@solgoodmancalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,075subscribers

-207 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002145039857
TypeChannel
Username@solgoodmancalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/solgoodmancalls

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,0758,2828,178.57 August 2026 — 8,282 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,282 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,276 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,264 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,241 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,223 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,217 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,205 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,188 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,166 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,151 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,124 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,096 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,075 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -207. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,044–8,313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 16:598,075-21
11 Sept 2026, 18:178,096-28
7 Sept 2026, 11:568,124-27
2 Sept 2026, 15:068,151-15
30 Aug 2026, 19:558,166-22
27 Aug 2026, 17:338,188-17
24 Aug 2026, 15:088,205-12
21 Aug 2026, 02:448,217-6
17 Aug 2026, 16:268,223-18
14 Aug 2026, 19:078,241-23
11 Aug 2026, 07:458,264-12
8 Aug 2026, 03:278,276-6
7 Aug 2026, 11:458,282no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:358,282first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7242.1%
🔥3721.6%
👍2414.0%
🎉116.43%
🥰95.26%
🤩63.51%
😁42.34%
🤣42.34%
🌭21.17%
💯21.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
80
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 16 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solgoodmancalls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,200 views8 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Robinhood supercycle is real, Cashcat almost 200m. maybe we are going to have a different run this time. Best way to trade RH chain is on BasedBot https://basedbot.app/r/solgoodman

🔥52🥰1

7 May 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,980 views5 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026
File

sitting at #5. at this point we just have to wait and see how strong $TripleTon is gonna compete against others, there's no better meme on Ton rn, getting twapped every minute. $570K ATH so far. trade bot: https://t.me/stonks_sniper_bot?start=id=14060=EQCtmJrAqLO5t7zIVW-ORl7x9s62QoZZ5EmpGDpH_LI07i9Q trade chart: https://stonkslabs.com/trade/EQCtmJrAqLO5t7zIVW-ORl7x9s62QoZZ5EmpGDpH_LI07i9Q/solgoodman

3👍1🔥1

7 May 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,410 views6 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

TON TON TON SAHUR NIGGA!

4🔥1🥰1

7 May 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,360 views11 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

whole TON eco is moving INSANE and I don't think it's stopping here, I'm not even sure if it even started tbh. Telegram never really adopted the TON eco as its own chain up until a few days ago, now it did. Worlds biggest communication platform has a chain. established coins like UTYA & MTONGA constantly pushing ATHs. think about it for a second, this is not even a derivate. It has a joke on its own, it's like 3rd o

4👍3🔥2🎉1🥰1

7 May 2026, 03:25 UTC906 views7 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

TON TON TON SAHUR!!!!!!!

5🔥1🥰1

6 May 2026, 18:30 UTC963 views13 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026

also hitting almost 700 members here. first started as SOL then I've also integrated ETH. Now I'm actually working on TON chain. had so many W stories from friends in DMs cuz they were able to catch the momentum/volume movements. if things go well with TON then it'll be much more beneficial to use the bot soon.

👍54🔥4

6 May 2026, 18:28 UTCviews —

goodmans journal pinned «TON is actually cooking man. Just found $QUACKS there at $35K and it just hit $300K. shits good. most trustworthy trading bots (stonks is pretty safe): #1 - https://t.me/stonks_sniper_bot?start=solgoodman #2- https://t.me/dtrade?start=solgoodman trading…»

6 May 2026, 18:28 UTC≈1,000 views13 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026

TON is actually cooking man. Just found $QUACKS there at $35K and it just hit $300K. shits good. most trustworthy trading bots (stonks is pretty safe): #1 - https://t.me/stonks_sniper_bot?start=solgoodman #2- https://t.me/dtrade?start=solgoodman trading terminal: https://stonkslabs.com/@solgoodman for the terminal you'd have charts like this here: https://stonkslabs.com/trade/EQCtmJrAqLO5t7zIVW-ORl7x9s62QoZZ5EmpGD

8🔥3🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @solgoodmancalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,807
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,825
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,396
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 41,069
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 48,253
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 26,925
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,518
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 37,004
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,815
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 41,053
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Shah’s Calls
@shahlito · 31,977
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 28,582
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“goodmans journal” (@solgoodmancalls), 8,075 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solgoodmancalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.