My dms are open: @LevisGems
Welcome to my trading journal.
Disclaimer:
Anything I share here is not financial advice, always do your own research. All content should be viewed as paid promotion.
Twitter: https://x.com/LevisNFT
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 58 days, net +14,921. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,197–53,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 09:19
46,971
-686
25 Sept 2026, 20:41
47,657
-485
17 Sept 2026, 09:56
48,142
-111
15 Sept 2026, 08:38
48,253
-142
13 Sept 2026, 15:58
48,395
-2,014
11 Sept 2026, 17:16
50,409
+4,374
9 Sept 2026, 03:18
46,035
-255
5 Sept 2026, 15:57
46,290
-332
3 Sept 2026, 14:00
46,622
-205
2 Sept 2026, 09:28
46,827
-109
1 Sept 2026, 09:35
46,936
-368
31 Aug 2026, 11:25
47,304
-285
30 Aug 2026, 11:48
47,589
-447
29 Aug 2026, 11:07
48,036
-589
28 Aug 2026, 08:13
48,625
-371
27 Aug 2026, 05:26
48,996
+8,966
26 Aug 2026, 03:34
40,030
+8,020
25 Aug 2026, 02:18
32,010
+46
23 Aug 2026, 19:38
31,964
-16
22 Aug 2026, 02:04
31,980
first reading
Engagement
187 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.24%
avg views ÷ 46,971 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,870
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.756%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 187 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
187 (1 August 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
162,560
Reactions total
1,198
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 00:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,690
Videos
≈96
Links
≈1,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,769 reactions across 173 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,413
50.6%
❤
1,528
32.0%
👍
149
3.12%
👏
144
3.02%
👀
143
3.00%
🫡
95
1.99%
🥰
90
1.89%
😎
38
0.797%
💯
26
0.545%
🍾
23
0.482%
👨💻
22
0.461%
😈
18
0.377%
🎉
15
0.315%
🐳
13
0.273%
😍
12
0.252%
🤩
10
0.21%
❤🔥
9
0.189%
🙏
9
0.189%
🤝
6
0.126%
💘
5
0.105%
1 further kind
1
0.021%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 177 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,769 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$BTC could be setting up really nicely after the midterms
Historically the 12 months after US midterms have been very strong for risk assets, with the S&P going green every single time since 1950
BTC has also performed well after the last 3 midterms, up 24%, 44% and 92% over the following year
Doesnt mean we instantly pump after the election tho. BTC actually dumped hard right after the 2018 midterms before eventu…
Holy shib followed WOOF and literally tweeted “WOOF”
First token paired directly with SHIB + backed by the cabal that sent it to $40B.
This is crazy lmao
https://x.com/shibtoken/status/2105775326395531662
0xa912c71c0e53701153cad9ba73e9b7d854418eae
Kinda insane $woof is directly pumping $shib rn
SHIB is starting to breakout and you will realize how high WOOF can actually go
Ran by the same cabal and directly paired together,
0xA912C71c0e53701153cAd9ba73E9B7D854418eaE
Bought a bag of $woof here
First token directly paired with SHIB on eth. Some of the OGs behind the SHIB cabal are getting involved
Think this could get interesting fast
0xa912c71c0e53701153cad9ba73e9b7d854418eae
$BOTIFY hit a 2x for us and the thesis is simple here
Last cylce it ran to 65M on their V1
BOTIFY v2 has way more tech and functionality and is at 2M
Repricing imminent
Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @LevisAlpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
OverDose Gems Calls @overdose_gems_calls · 47,320 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Marcell's Trenches @marcellcooks · 47,669 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Cielo Announcements @cieloannouncements · 44,178 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Rekt Fencer @rektfencer_threads · 76,942 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Renzos Alpha @renzosalpha · 84,965 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Brozinkers @brozinkers · 53,466 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
SOL TRENDING @trendingssol · 136,961 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Lyxe’s Journal @cryptolyxecalls · 54,694 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Bitcoin Price @bitcoin_price · 56,717 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
0xNobler @CryptoNobler · 49,597 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Pow's Gem Calls @PowsGemCalls · 112,332 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Gambles 🎲 MadApes @mad_apes_gambles · 101,513 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Arcane Gems @arcanegems · 47,159 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
Maestro Bot Updates @MaestroSniperUpdates · 186,973 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Hub @MaestroBotsHub · 165,748 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Watcher Guru @WatcherGuru · 628,853 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Levis Calls” (@LevisAlpha), 46,971 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LevisAlpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.