Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prerich lobby by mememe 💸

Channel

Prerich lobby by mememe 💸

@prerichlobby69

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,670subscribers

-341 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109685553
TypeChannel
Username@prerichlobby69
Descriptionhi me is mememe wagmi vibes only. get rich or eat dust nothing is financial advice. this is my trading blog and journal My ONLY handle @mememeLady1 https://x.com/mememe69696969
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prerichlobby69

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6707,0116,840.57 August 2026 — 7,011 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,011 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,003 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,986 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,964 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,959 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,948 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,946 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,928 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,916 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,893 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,868 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,852 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,835 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,813 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,780 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,758 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,740 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,731 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,712 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,702 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,696 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,688 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,680 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,670 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 88 days, net -341. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,619–7,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 13:406,670-10
31 Oct 2026, 11:466,680-8
28 Oct 2026, 11:376,688-8
25 Oct 2026, 21:166,696-6
23 Oct 2026, 07:276,702-10
20 Oct 2026, 09:446,712-19
17 Oct 2026, 00:286,731-9
14 Oct 2026, 09:216,740-18
11 Oct 2026, 02:016,758-22
4 Oct 2026, 23:006,780-33
25 Sept 2026, 11:366,813-22
17 Sept 2026, 03:206,835-17
12 Sept 2026, 22:586,852-16
9 Sept 2026, 07:026,868-25
4 Sept 2026, 04:226,893-23
31 Aug 2026, 08:266,916-12
28 Aug 2026, 18:266,928-18
25 Aug 2026, 10:436,946-2
22 Aug 2026, 17:396,948-11
19 Aug 2026, 09:246,959first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 23 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈638
Videos
≈63
Links
≈1,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3368.8%
👍612.5%
👀36.25%
😭24.17%
👎12.08%
💯12.08%
🔥12.08%
😡12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026

One of the best memes on hood chain right now it’s also iconic

❤1

13 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,180 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026

0xeaa9abB805Db03b6859662354aBfE0C2A30902ae

❤1

8 Jul 2026, 23:36 UTC≈1,650 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Thoughts on robinhood chain: we’re talking about one of the largest financial corporations in the world embracing crypto and making it easily accessible to normies. It’s the easy on-boarding to crypto. They make MORE per transaction on their new app which means it would take significantly less users to make more money than their current stonks division. The amount of marketing that will go into this hasn’t even start…

❤3

8 Jul 2026, 23:33 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 4 November 2026

Aped this on hoodie chain. I feel like it’s a good enough entry to share 0xc72c01aab5f5678dc1d6f5c6d2b417d91d402ba3 Historically everyone has enjoyed hoodies in crypto so this should do well too. It’s already done well but it’s retraced to where it’s comfortable to share

1 Jun 2026, 04:11 UTC≈1,260 views0 reactionsread 4 November 2026

I have this feeling we’ve nearly bottomed

1 Jun 2026, 04:10 UTC≈1,210 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026

It may be time to start looking at 1000x longs soon

❤3👀1

19 Mar 2026, 20:23 UTC≈1,620 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Looks like $METAWIN Presale just went live. Last time we got in early with Metawin was with the NFTs both presale and mint. These did a 10x at the time. I’ve punted a bit here. There’s waves where once price sells out then it goes up higher. So pretty much earlier the better technically It’s on round 3 now https://mw.xyz get in if you want this price 🫡 I think it’ll go to 4 pretty soon

👀2❤1

6 Mar 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,300 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026

6M now what if this is the wif of 2026 💀

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @prerichlobby69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 27,969
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,818
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 18,685
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 October 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,681
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 30,983
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,384
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,044
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,118
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 45,156
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,736
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,403
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,169
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,160
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Cooker's Cooks
@CookersCooks · 18,799
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,846
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝
@J7tradingjournal · 20,811
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 28,543
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 25,258
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,299
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,575
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prerich lobby by mememe 💸” (@prerichlobby69), 6,670 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prerichlobby69.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.