Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 旧亿 call

Channel

旧亿 call

@jiuyicall

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,661subscribers

-170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001989394694
TypeChannel
Username@jiuyicall
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jiuyicall

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,66111,83111,7467 August 2026 — 11,831 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,831 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,827 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,824 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,817 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,813 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,809 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,802 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,794 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,787 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,788 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,780 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,770 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,773 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,769 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,760 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,754 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,741 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,738 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,734 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,727 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,721 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,715 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,711 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,692 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,684 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,679 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,671 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,661 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,636–11,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:1911,661-10
16 Sept 2026, 08:5911,671-8
14 Sept 2026, 15:5811,679-5
13 Sept 2026, 02:1911,684-8
11 Sept 2026, 06:3811,692-19
8 Sept 2026, 11:4211,711-4
5 Sept 2026, 04:1511,715-6
3 Sept 2026, 07:4511,721-6
1 Sept 2026, 22:0711,727-7
1 Sept 2026, 00:1611,734-4
31 Aug 2026, 00:3611,738-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:2411,741-13
29 Aug 2026, 00:4711,754-6
28 Aug 2026, 03:5411,760-9
27 Aug 2026, 06:1311,769-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:3311,773+3
24 Aug 2026, 06:4411,770-4
22 Aug 2026, 13:3811,774-6
21 Aug 2026, 02:3811,780-10
19 Aug 2026, 23:1211,790first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 11,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.611%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held88 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total40,959
Reactions total243
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

907 reactions across 83 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36940.7%
👍27530.3%
👏566.17%
🔥525.73%
🤔293.20%
🤬232.54%
💯212.32%
😁192.09%
😭121.32%
👻111.21%
🥰111.21%
🤪101.10%
😢70.772%
🥱40.441%
😨30.331%
😈20.221%
🤯20.221%
🤓10.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 907 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC707 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

版权永远是第一位的,Eth的结局必然是归零,Og的假版权没有用,最后只会留下Bags的太空狗,交给时间。参考龙王的这个思路,其他的都会死。

6🤬4

2 Sept 2026, 12:29 UTC732 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026

推特Space好像已经开了4个月了,我考虑了下决定改为一周1-2次。 Bags太空狗在我看来,依然是这轮最好的叙述,逻辑叙述没有任何变化,我依然坚定的持有没有卖出。短期的亏损和价格只是暂时的,等天时到来依然会成为这轮的周期meme,马斯克都不赌你哪里来的未来。

🔥154🤓1

1 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,360 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$Fable下一个山羊Rug?Rb链已进化到Sol速通AI时?$Asteroid(Sol)的价格不代表价值,仍是这轮最强叙事和创新Meme? https://x.com/cryptojiuyi/status/2094766347406426511?s=46

5🤪3

1 Sept 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,050 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/rebeccaperrotto/status/2094750770943885718?s=46

6🥱1

31 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,290 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

短期的价格往往不代表价值,人必须要有梦想,$Asteroid (Sol)感觉依然是这轮最有机会、最有上限的meme? https://x.com/cryptojiuyi/status/2094402904585330886?s=46

👍12🤬2😁1

30 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,620 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$牛来上Alpha冲100m?$Pons连涨一周10X到300m?$Asteroid (Sol) 依然是最好叙述,只差个契机就是市场的奇迹! https://x.com/cryptojiuyi/status/2094043755053724015?s=46

👍4😁3🥱1

29 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈1,850 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Trump再次发币?孙割这次流量玩脱了? $Asteroid (Sol) 依然感觉是这轮最有机会、最好叙述的meme? https://x.com/cryptojiuyi/status/2093677259387445370?s=46

👍3

28 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,900 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

马斯克再次转推太空狗,时刻关注Liv?Eth的盗版已然结束,而Sol的 $Asteroid 才刚刚开始?为什么会是这轮潜力最大的meme? https://x.com/cryptojiuyi/status/2093316410374304066?s=46

👍8

27 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,850 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Liv这个事情确实在马斯克心里分量不清😬可是别人又不是去喊meme币,从始至终回复的都是Liv的愿望和Liv妈妈,怎么还活在幻想里?哎可怜之人,必有可恨之处

👍16

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @jiuyicall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

大宇投资频道
@BTCdayu2 · 30,094
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
PANews Web3丨加密货币丨区块链新闻频道
@ChannelPANews · 24,042
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
方程式新闻 BWEnews
@BWEnews · 72,766
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
金十数据 闪电资讯
@jin10light · 25,121
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
币安公告
@binance_cn · 34,158
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
BlockBeats
@theblockbeats · 37,492
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
OUTA Announcement
@outa_announcement · 27,557
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,786
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
jump.fun
@JumpDotFun · 106,577
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
DeJob—Web3招聘求职频道📮
@DeJob_official · 46,726
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
abetterpath 招聘求职
@abetterpathxyz · 33,176
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“旧亿 call” (@jiuyicall), 11,661 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiuyicall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.