Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mark Gems 💎

Channel

Mark Gems 💎

@MarkGems

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,545subscribers

-157 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584420389
TypeChannel
Username@MarkGems
DescriptionAll chain Shitcoiner Insights on building wealth to achieve freedom. Degen play - @MarkDegens Promo / Marketing - @MarkEth Shitcoins are extremely risky Nothing is financial advice
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MarkGems

Growth

11,54511,70211,623.57 August 2026 — 11,702 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,702 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,696 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,690 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,679 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,674 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,666 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,658 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,654 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,638 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,631 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,625 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,614 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,607 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,599 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,592 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,574 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,564 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,562 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,561 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,554 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,548 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 23 days, net -157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,521–11,726 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:0611,545-3
29 Aug 2026, 12:1611,548-6
28 Aug 2026, 11:3311,554-7
27 Aug 2026, 14:2511,561-1
26 Aug 2026, 16:1611,562-2
25 Aug 2026, 17:2611,564-10
24 Aug 2026, 20:2511,574-18
23 Aug 2026, 03:1811,592-7
21 Aug 2026, 15:1811,599-8
20 Aug 2026, 14:3711,607-7
19 Aug 2026, 12:1111,614-11
18 Aug 2026, 11:2211,625-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:3611,631-7
15 Aug 2026, 20:3511,638-16
14 Aug 2026, 07:0911,654-4
12 Aug 2026, 23:2311,658-8
11 Aug 2026, 23:0211,666-8
10 Aug 2026, 21:4611,674-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:1211,679-11
8 Aug 2026, 16:5411,690first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.64%
avg views ÷ 11,545 subscribers
Avg views / post
420
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
72
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held88 (28 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total15,972
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,670
Videos
270
Links
3,720

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTCviews —

Mark Gems 💎 pinned «Gm traders 💹 Charts says short but Binanace giving us sign of $BTC going 82-83k. Will close my shorts and will put at sl At entry and little hedge longs on $ETH , $ETHFI , $OP They never fails I have been tracking them from 1-2 years. $BTC and $ETH &…»

29 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC297 viewsread 30 August 2026

Gm traders 💹 Charts says short but Binanace giving us sign of $BTC going 82-83k. Will close my shorts and will put at sl At entry and little hedge longs on $ETH , $ETHFI , $OP They never fails I have been tracking them from 1-2 years. $BTC and $ETH & its Beta HIGHER 💹 https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2093603686769463716?s=46

26 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTCviews —

Mark Gems 💎 pinned «Shift will be from $HYPE TO $ASTER https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092677135135576411?s=46»

26 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC420 viewsread 30 August 2026

Shift will be from $HYPE TO $ASTER https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092677135135576411?s=46

26 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTCviews —

Mark Gems 💎 pinned «$ASTER Looks ready to crime here. You first heard by MARK 👑 https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092638279778631751?s=46»

26 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC426 viewsread 30 August 2026

$ASTER Looks ready to crime here. You first heard by MARK 👑 https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092638279778631751?s=46

25 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC518 viewsread 30 August 2026

Bought this as degen looks good here for few Xs - $SLAP Cat https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/XODBMDi3_0xd82f2e48a0c7c90bb38f62d45c8d2096b7ccbfad Send this cat higher to slap other cats down 💹 Launched by Cedric owner of flap

25 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC445 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Bought spot $PEOPLE WITH size here at 0.8130 Watch under 48h it gonna pump hard straight to Stratosphere 🚀 https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092268023000539153?s=46

25 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTCviews —

Mark Gems 💎 pinned «$MYRO as I said most undervalued Dog 🐕 on $SOL Chain. Break 0.003 and EAT a 0 then. 🐕 is hungry and wanna feast. 🔜 0.011 🎯 HIGHER $MYRO 💹 https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092168619824443579?s=46»

25 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC399 viewsread 30 August 2026

$MYRO as I said most undervalued Dog 🐕 on $SOL Chain. Break 0.003 and EAT a 0 then. 🐕 is hungry and wanna feast. 🔜 0.011 🎯 HIGHER $MYRO 💹 https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092168619824443579?s=46

25 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTCviews —

Mark Gems 💎 pinned «Gm believers ❤️ Sometime my accuracy Scares me out 🫣 $BTC 🎯 https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/2092157238853124604?s=46»

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @MarkGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 140,000 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,642
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mark Gems 💎” (@MarkGems), 11,545 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarkGems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.