Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sapphire Call’s

Channel

Sapphire Call’s

@SapphireCalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,429subscribers

-295 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001522389056
TypeChannel
Username@SapphireCalls
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SapphireCalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,42912,72412,576.57 August 2026 — 12,724 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,724 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,720 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,718 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,711 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,706 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,693 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,682 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,678 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,657 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,642 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,620 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,609 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,599 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,597 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,572 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,551 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,538 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,531 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,543 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,559 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,555 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,563 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,556 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,560 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,539 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,522 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,497 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,481 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,471 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,461 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,448 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,429 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,385–12,768 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:5912,429-19
16 Sept 2026, 21:4012,448-13
15 Sept 2026, 01:2212,461-10
13 Sept 2026, 12:1912,471-10
11 Sept 2026, 19:5812,481-16
9 Sept 2026, 05:1612,497-25
6 Sept 2026, 00:0012,522-17
3 Sept 2026, 21:0112,539-21
2 Sept 2026, 13:1512,560+4
1 Sept 2026, 13:4412,556-7
31 Aug 2026, 15:5312,563+8
30 Aug 2026, 17:2712,555-2
29 Aug 2026, 18:2812,557-2
28 Aug 2026, 21:2612,559+16
27 Aug 2026, 21:1712,543+12
26 Aug 2026, 20:3412,531-7
25 Aug 2026, 22:5212,538-13
24 Aug 2026, 21:2712,551-21
23 Aug 2026, 10:4512,572-14
22 Aug 2026, 00:3612,586first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

172 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7644.2%
👍4928.5%
🔥2916.9%
❤‍🔥116.40%
💯74.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2024 to 25 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 May 2025, 17:48 UTC≈16,700 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026

If anyone here needs a platform to trade perps try this out it doesn’t require KYC

20🔥8💯7❤‍🔥5👍1

25 May 2025, 17:47 UTC≈15,600 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @arcanegemsPhoto

by far the best product I’ve used for spots or perps. - on the App Store - no kyc - low fees - easy to use - perps + spot https://www.ourbit.com/register?inviteCode=arcane

21👍6🔥1

1 Jan 2025, 21:03 UTC≈28,300 views53 reactionsread 2 September 2026

I stopped posting here to only do quality non paid shills on https://t.me/ArcaneGems

18👍15🔥14❤‍🔥6

15 Feb 2024, 21:08 UTC≈21,800 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Twitter will be where all my serious calls get posted so make sure to follow https://twitter.com/sapphycrypto

👍102

14 Feb 2024, 21:00 UTC≈13,000 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🚨 HYPED PRESALE $WREKT COIN SOL 🚨 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨LIVE NOW 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 $WREKT IS A RACE AND EARN GAME FOR PCS 💀 check the trailer out on there website its SICK ! hosted on the BONKOPAD launchpad TO TAKE PART HEAD OVER TO BONKO.IO JOIN THERE TG NOW FOR MORE INFO: https://t.me/bonkopadportal $WREKT links: ✈️ TG: https://t.me/bonkopadportal 🌐 Website: http://BONKO.IO

👍41🔥1

14 Feb 2024, 17:18 UTC≈7,660 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

NOICE https://www.dexview.com/eth/0x6D7497751656618Fc38CfB5478994a20F7E235df

14 Feb 2024, 12:49 UTC≈6,190 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Update: Dragon Slayer is launching on SOL February 15th at 3PM UTC. 1448 IDO raise. Join TG for détails. https://t.me/DragonSlayerGame https://docs.dragonslayer.game/ecosystem/dragon-battle https://dragonslayer.game/ https://testnet.dragonslayer.game/ B8dbE1PoeWPK7pG4BccFFyf688hqJPXPvB62Mk8CDm9r

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SapphireCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,703
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Gems Mine
@MineGems · 31,155
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,900
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Bruisers Calls
@bruiserscalls · 33,412
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,968
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,807
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
CaesarsCalls
@Caesars_Calls · 39,380
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Koba's Calls
@kobascalls · 32,020
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 41,000
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 90,836
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls · 31,286
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 47,229
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
Dr. Crypto Calls ❁
@dr_crypto_channel · 23,056
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
Crypto King Call
@Crypto_KingCall · 96,765
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
EZ Money’s Gems 💎
@EZMoneyCalls · 26,032
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
ETH LP Lock, Burn
@ethsafesniper · 27,042
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,747
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,271
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,695
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,089
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 🐧
@brookcalls · 32,782
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sapphire Call’s” (@SapphireCalls), 12,429 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SapphireCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.