🪙 SOL $BTC $BTC Buy The Cat sends you Bitcoin rewards X:x.com/BTCbuythecat Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall

Channel
Crypto King Call
@Crypto_KingCall
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
106,246subscribers
-6,490 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001605692521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_KingCall |
| Description | All about #Crypto investing and #Marketing Review and introduce projects in real time All #Blockchain networks are accepted With us, $Alpha is always in progress ‼️DM ONLY @MikeSilva ‼️DM ONLY @AlexLubin Twitter:X.com/CryptoKingCall |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_KingCall |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 106,246 | +5,418 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 100,828 | -3,556 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 104,384 | -1,861 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 106,245 | -1,603 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 107,848 | -1,366 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 109,214 | -1,282 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 110,496 | -1,863 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 112,359 | -1,659 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 114,018 | -1,551 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 115,569 | -885 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 116,454 | +23,988 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 92,466 | -1,786 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 94,252 | -2,507 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 96,759 | -2,078 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 98,837 | -1,088 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 99,925 | -835 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 100,760 | -836 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 101,596 | -724 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 102,320 | -2,197 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 104,517 | first reading |
Engagement
120 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.9%
- avg views ÷ 106,246 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41,300
- 83 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 83
- of 120 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 120 (30 July 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,429,750 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,130
- Videos
- ≈65
- Links
- ≈3,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
🪙 SOL $EMBER aunch a coin on a bonding curve paired with SOL, USDC or any of 144+ tokenized stocks. 80% of every trade's tax goes where you decide holders, burns, a SuperLotto or your team every 15 minutes, on-chain, automatically. Website:embercurve.fun X:x.com/embercurve Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🪙 SOL $CATE Born from the same pure meme energy that turned a Shiba Inu into a global phenomenon, C*** is the feline answer to the internet’s favourite dog coin. No complicated roadmap, no fake utility promises, just the classic dogs vs cats rivalry played out on the blockchain. It’s a community driven memecoin through and through Website:cate.meme Telegram:t.me/catecoin_telegram X:x.com/i/communities/2004330…
🪙 SOL $PURR Hypurr is the official Hyperliquid cat mascot. Now the cat has its own coin, PURR, the first memecoin paired with HYPE. President Trump announced that the CFTC is working on bringing Hyperliquid HYPE to the US Website:hypurr-liquid.xyz X:x.com/HypurrSF_ Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🪙 SOL $OTC Over-The-Counter, earn stocks, pre-ipo, and yield. Website:otcdesks.cash X:x.com/otc_labs Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🔥RBH $RSTR Using ETH fees to accumulate Robin Hood hats, drain the floating supply, and squeeze the price Website:rstr.wtf X:x.com/rstrosrs Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🪙 SOL $USELESS Do nothing. Get Everything. Useless The world's first cryptocurrency that promises nothing and delivers exactly that Zero purpose. 100% useless. The world’s most honest cryptocurrency. Website:theuselesscoin.com X:x.com/theuselesscoin Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🪙 SOL $LOOM Before it was Solana, it was Loom Protocol. A real chapter in the story, with a new name inspired by Solana Beach. Today, $LOOM is a community memecoin celebrating that early name. Same little nod to history. A whole new mascot, a very good jacket, and a scrapbook of our own. Website:loomsol.fun X:x.com/LOOMCTOSOL Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🔥 RBH $ROUTE The most efficient DEX aggregator for Robinhood Website:route.kim X:x.com/routedotfun Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🪙SOL $NASDUCK Just a NASDUCK that pays you in NASDAQ (QQQ) X:x.com/NASDUCKOTC Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🪙 SOL $OTC Over-The-Counter, earn stocks, pre-ipo, and yield. Website:otcdesks.cash X:x.com/otc_labs Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
🔥 ROB $ROBIN Robin the Frog from The Muppets Robin is Kermit’s nephew and is featured in Muppet Robin Hood A frog named Robin. A Robin Hood story. Website:therobincoin.xyz Telegram:t.me/robincoinrbh X:x.com/robincoinrh Contract LINK || CHART LINK ✅ Review by #CryptoKingCall
Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @Crypto_KingCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Crypto_KingCall edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 7 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@catecoin_telegram · 21,3994 postsCash Cat
@cashcat_robinhood · 3,2383 postsStonkFun
@StonkFunXyz · 1,9033 postsCupsey Portal
@CupseyTheMascot · 8302 postsShibinHood
@Shibinhood · 1,4252 postsCatalorian Portal
@catalorianmeme · 21 postCHEEMS PORTAL
@CheemsOG · 1691 postGASSPAS PORTAL
@gasspascoin · 1821 postKoma Inu Portal
@komabnb · 4,4321 postMARTIANS | PORTAL
@MartiansOfMars · 3051 postMINICATE
@minicatesolana · 641 postNeegy Community
@neegycommunity · 2431 postricelabs
@ricelabs · 11 postdogwifpants
@thedogwifpants · 2,2491 postThe Good Coin
@TheGo0dCoin · 8361 postSling CTO
@theslingbull · 61 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Crypto_KingCall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mad_apes_call · 82,793#1
@Maestrosdegen · 36,292#2
@trending · 481,711#3
@PowsGemCalls · 113,274#4
@CapriCalls · 40,215#5
@ETHTRENDING · 44,185#6
@MetaBlockchainNews · 102,437#7
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 212,590#8
@CryptoPandaGems_1 · 39,031#9
@cryptocatcalls · 8,206#10
@whale200xcalls · 2,825#11
@CryptoSuper_Gems · 28,289#12
@sonicwhalescalls · 19,658#13
@DegenSeals · 34,341#14
@kobesgambles · 16,126#15
@CatCalls_ETH · 3,482#16
@venomcalls · 35,861#17
@Cryptomoonshot_call · 6,493#18
@dr_crypto_channel · 25,866#19
@houseofdegeneracy · 37,053#20
@CryptoGemsKing · 1,653#21
@sugarydick · 33,874#22
@metamoonshots · 42,517#23
@CryptoTVOT_News · 216,041#24
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,463#25
@decentralizedclub · 4,289#26
@CryptoSolutionAnn · 61,405#27
@spydefi · 42,570#28
@GAMBLEszn · 996#29
@minidraftcalls · 72,846#30
@GodfatherCall · 2,772#31
@TheLastCryptoRun · 6,293#32
@Defidoxxcalls · 31,087#33
@ralphscall · 33,622#34
@Cryptocity_News · 5,962#35
@CryptoDefi_Calls · 30,978#36
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 149,926#37
@SapphireCalls · 12,497#38
@mad_apes_gambles · 102,245#39
@trendingssol · 140,641#40
@SOLTRENDING · 425,465#41
@Crypto_Trust_CommunityAnn · 41,093#42
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,696#43
@crypto_whale_global_annn · 41,435#44
@findertrending · 27,540#45
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 203,268#46
@BigBangCall · 18,329#47
@bagcalls · 58,177#48
@ryoshigamble · 38,247#49
@Royallcall · 4,782#50
@CryptoExplorerNews · 4,238#51
@GlobalExploreCalls · 25,245#52
@arcanegems · 47,183#53
@CHINAGEMOFCCCN · 95,926#54
@dexscreener_trendings · 18,763#55
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,399#56
@Teslacallsofficial · 58,013#57
@moonspace · 19,575#58
@GenesisChain_Calls · 15,249#59
@Knight_call · 10,572#60
@cryptodetectorann · 24,107#61
@cryptopandaann · 61,290#62
@cryptopyramidannouncement · 4,910#63
@BlockChainBrotherCalls · 1,927#64
@LevisGemCalls · 14,498#65
@GobellCallss · 4,797#66
@shineigems · 19,476#67
@CryptoArenaOfficialAnn · 37,241#68
@APEDGEMSCALLS · 4,067#69
@GemsofRa · 17,968#70
@marine_CryptoCalls · 70,570#71
@WaltonCalls · 3,554#72
@cryptogems55552 · 128,480#73
@SunriseVenturesAnn · 114,606#74
@geekchatNews · 7,448#75
@chinesecalls3 · 597#76
@DoxxedChannel · 17,324#77
@Chinese_dragon_calls · 53,498#78
@ZoroChinese_Calls · 10,986#79
@asianmarketcall · 28,838#80
@skyrimcall · 10,792#81
@cryptoastronautnews · 63,007#82
@TimeFliesCalls · 9,294#83
@shahlito · 32,119#84
@KurokoxGems1 · 2,533#85
@Crypto_Planet_GlobalChannel · 48,111#86
@crazy_ap · 1,222#87
@CryptoFi_news · 49,069#88
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,627#89
@APEWONECALL · 15,351#90
@cryptolistings · 17,880#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoSuper_Gems · 28,289
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@Defidoxxcalls · 31,087
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
@Cookiesales · 74,623
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@CryptoPandaGems_1 · 39,031
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
@pumpcoinbets · 998,208
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@CryptoDefi_Calls · 30,978
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@maybac_whales · 42,638
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@ChinapumpWXC · 91,040
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@Gemhunterrs · 702,937
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
@minidraftcalls · 72,846
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@Teslacallsofficial · 58,013
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
@cryptogems55552 · 128,480
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@TheCrypto100XGems · 28,537
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 203,268
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 149,926
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@takanaeth101 · 34,258
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
@Chinese_dragon_calls · 53,498
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@CryptoTVOT_News · 216,041
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@CHINAGEMOFCCCN · 95,926
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@LowCarbonToken · 104,283
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@MetaBlockchainNews · 102,437
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
@Crypto_FinderNews · 100,598
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 212,590
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
@Crypto_Trust_CommunityAnn · 41,093
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto King Call” (@Crypto_KingCall), 106,246 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_KingCall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.