🪙 BTC April 1 Who got fooled today thinking we'd go to the moon? Let's see if BTC breaks $66K with force... Not much longer until Powell is out... 😊
❤2

Channel
@TheLastCryptoRun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,270subscribers
-79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001280199847 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheLastCryptoRun |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheLastCryptoRun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 6,270 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 6,284 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 6,295 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 6,316 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 6,328 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 6,344 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 6,349 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 6,349 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
153 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 43.1% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 15.0% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 14.4% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 5.88% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 5.88% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 5.23% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 3.27% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 2.61% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.96% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪙 BTC April 1 Who got fooled today thinking we'd go to the moon? Let's see if BTC breaks $66K with force... Not much longer until Powell is out... 😊
❤2
Wohooo nice flush on BTC, let's see what happens this week. BTC trying to break the 0.382 Fib. Are the discounts finally coming? 🤩
👌2
🪙 BTC March 27 Nice. Market is acting as we predicted. The previous chart aged well... We're at an interesting spot, BTC hit the TP of the macro short that was mentioned on March 18 if I'm not mistaken... However, everything points to us potentially hitting a new low, reaching $60K. SP500 closed the week red, dropping -2% today... Let's see what Monday brings but things are looking bad. Holding crypto is being a m…
❤6🔥1
Signed Ezi2x
🪙BTC March 24 Interesting week for BTC. Let's pretend we're surprised by the market manipulation for the 1030932nd time. No surprises, as we had considered this scenario before... They just came out saying they were considering "peace" after SP500 dropped almost -4% on Monday, clearly they have to make moves to "save themselves"... This also caused BTC to "magically" bounce right at the 0.5 Fibonacci. That said, …
❤4
Signed Ezi2x
BTC March 22 If you've been following what's been shared here, this dump didn't surprise you.. GGs. Like I said, right now it's just a matter of staying chill... Despite the heavy manipulation we've been living through lately and the war on top making the market way more volatile... Everything is going as expected... Again, just watch from a distance for now... When the time comes, we'll act accordingly.
❤3
Signed Ezi2x
Following up on the BTC analysis 🪙 not much to add. It's trying to bounce at the 0.618 Fib. However, I think we're at a level where we just need to watch from a distance... Sometimes doing nothing is also a way of doing something.
❤4
Signed Ezi2x
The Last Run pinned «Hey guys, I'll be sharing market insights and my overall vision here. NFA, just how I see things playing out... Let's ride those candles ✈️»
We're at a pretty interesting spot on 🪙 BTC right now. A few hours ago it gave us a solid short setup, but it's struggling again at the same level it was a few days ago... Honestly, I see high probability we head back to $60K given the weight of the setup. However, there's been a lot of volatility lately manipulating the market and giving us another short entry. BTC remains bearish for me. In my case, the chips ar…
👍6❤2
Signed Ezi2x
Hey guys, I'll be sharing market insights and my overall vision here. NFA, just how I see things playing out... Let's ride those candles ✈️
❤6
Signed Ezi2x
im tired of winning trump
😁3👌2❤1
Signed Ezi2x
only Netanyahu can save us
😁8❤3👍1😢1
Signed Ezi2x
BNB launch coming soon ~ turn notification on ~ id say 3-4 days max
🔥9❤8💩3🤩3
Signed Ezi2x
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheLastCryptoRun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,368,596 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Last Run” (@TheLastCryptoRun), 6,270 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheLastCryptoRun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.