Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax
๐ฅ32๐24๐22๐21โค19
Signed Raymond

Channel
@ZoroChinese_Calls
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
10,665subscribers
-1,135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001526892403 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZoroChinese_Calls |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZoroChinese_Calls |
Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
5,020 average views per post against 10,665 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 47.1%. Across the 5,257 registered channels in the same cohort โ 10,000โ31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ the middle half sit between 1.83% and 10.2%, with a median of 5.05%.
| Window | 30 days (25 August 2026 โ 24 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (1 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 100,407 |
| Mature posts only | 47.8% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 10,665 measured 17 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:eng ยท 5,257 channels ยท p10 0.494% ยท p25 1.83% ยท p50 5.05% ยท p75 10.2% ยท p90 18.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.030th percentile ยท 9.3ร the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ยฑ0.272% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding |
| Post language | English ยท 100.0% of the windowโs posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ above it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 10,665 | -52 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 10,717 | -67 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 10,784 | -105 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 10,889 | -97 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 10,986 | +928 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 10,058 | +151 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 9,907 | -78 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 9,985 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 10,010 | -55 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 10,065 | +1,948 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 8,117 | -149 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 8,266 | -1,729 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 9,995 | -57 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 10,052 | -159 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 10,211 | -53 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 10,264 | -50 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 10,314 | -61 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 10,375 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 10,395 | -1,280 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 11,675 | first reading |
175 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 175 (1 August 2026 โ 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 90,117 |
| Reactions total | 1,481 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
16,178 reactions across 175 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 3,332 | 20.6% | |
| โค | 3,298 | 20.4% | |
| ๐ | 3,252 | 20.1% | |
| ๐ | 3,153 | 19.5% | |
| ๐ | 3,110 | 19.2% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 11 | 0.068% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 0.049% | |
| โก | 4 | 0.025% | |
| ๐พ | 2 | 0.012% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.006% | |
| ๐ณ | 1 | 0.006% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.006% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.006% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.006% | |
| ๐ฏ | 1 | 0.006% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.006% | |
| ๐คฉ | 1 | 0.006% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 175 of the 175 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 16,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax
๐ฅ32๐24๐22๐21โค19
Signed Raymond
$ 103.37
๐20๐13๐ฅ12โค10๐10
Signed Raymond
$ANSEM back at 390m and everyones too busy scanning random dogshit billions
๐28๐ฅ23๐22๐22โค21
Signed Raymond
insane chart. send it to 100m
โค21๐ฅ19๐18๐13๐11
Signed Raymond
quick reminder to use a trading app If your not using FOMO your missing out on a lot of money this cycle Mfs turning $100-$500K on there Heres the link to Download (10-40% off fees): https://fomo.family/r/Degens
โค27๐25๐23๐ฅ22๐19
Signed Raymond
New ath on $FONE the fone.โ memecoin, watch your entries and DYOR fam. https://dexscreener.com/solana/3dcwhqJp6JBTJPq8ga335HWgSQVS7uQmdmeX7iGjMNpj CTPoyCwkjMvoJwU4xvZZqoD8tiYk6yDchySiN5gGpump
๐ฅ31๐25๐23๐20โค18
Signed Raymond
Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax
๐30๐ฅ29โค25๐15๐14
Signed Raymond
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐ฅ14โค12๐10๐8๐7
Signed Raymond
$SPURDO๐ฅ ็คพๅบ็่ตทๆฅๅๅฎ่ๆ่ถฃ๏ผ่ฎฉๆไปฌ็็ๅฎไผ่ตฐๅไฝๆน๏ผๆไบฎ่ฟๆฏๅฐๅ ็ไฝ ็ๆก็ฎ ๐ฅROBINHOODๅ็บฆ: 0x6982e278A04B8C451f738727042d95565Fb47f33 CHART: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xe2e373698d104f9c4844bd62e96120c435fdfc51 X: https://t.me/Spurdo_R
๐ฅ19๐13โค10๐7๐4
Signed Raymond
Photo, posted without a caption
๐ฅ14๐11๐11๐10โค8
Signed Raymond
$AI new ath
โค14๐11๐10๐ฅ10๐10
Signed Raymond
Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax
๐ฅ14๐13โค12๐8๐7
Signed Raymond
Showing the 12 most recent of 175 posts we hold for @ZoroChinese_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ZoroChinese_Calls edited 1 post after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐้ฒธ้ฑผ๏ผๆ่ต่ ไนๅฎถ ZOROโ๏ธ๐๐ขโ (@ZoroChinese_Calls), 10,665 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZoroChinese_Calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.