Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿ‹้ฒธ้ฑผ๏ผŒๆŠ•่ต„่€…ไน‹ๅฎถ ZOROโ˜Ž๏ธ๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿ“ข

Channel

๐Ÿ‹้ฒธ้ฑผ๏ผŒๆŠ•่ต„่€…ไน‹ๅฎถ ZOROโ˜Ž๏ธ๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿ“ข

@ZoroChinese_Calls

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

10,665subscribers

-1,135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526892403
TypeChannel
Username@ZoroChinese_Calls
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZoroChinese_Calls

Topic

Crypto & trading โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

5,020 average views per post against 10,665 subscribers โ€” an engagement rate of 47.1%. Across the 5,257 registered channels in the same cohort โ€” 10,000โ€“31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ€” the middle half sit between 1.83% and 10.2%, with a median of 5.05%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 โ€“ 24 September 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (1 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled100,407
Mature posts only47.8% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers10,665 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:eng ยท 5,257 channels ยท p10 0.494% ยท p25 1.83% ยท p50 5.05% ยท p75 10.2% ยท p90 18.1%
Position in cohort99.030th percentile ยท 9.3ร— the cohort median
Uncertaintyยฑ0.272% of the figure, from Telegramโ€™s rounding
Post languageEnglish ยท 100.0% of the windowโ€™s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร— away from that cohortโ€™s median โ€” above it โ€” on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ€” audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโ€™s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,11711,8009,958.57 August 2026 โ€” 11,800 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 11,800 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 11,770 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 11,740 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 11,675 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 10,395 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 10,375 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 10,314 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 10,264 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 10,211 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 10,052 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 9,995 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 8,266 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 8,117 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 10,065 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 10,010 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 9,985 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 9,907 subscribers6 September 2026 โ€” 10,058 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 10,986 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 10,889 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 10,784 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 10,717 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 10,665 subscribers10,6657 August 202617 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1,135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 7,565โ€“12,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:3810,665-52
15 Sept 2026, 09:1710,717-67
13 Sept 2026, 20:4110,784-105
12 Sept 2026, 00:4110,889-97
9 Sept 2026, 17:5810,986+928
6 Sept 2026, 08:3810,058+151
1 Sept 2026, 20:369,907-78
29 Aug 2026, 19:479,985-25
28 Aug 2026, 23:1410,010-55
28 Aug 2026, 01:5710,065+1,948
24 Aug 2026, 22:288,117-149
21 Aug 2026, 09:348,266-1,729
18 Aug 2026, 12:229,995-57
17 Aug 2026, 12:0710,052-159
16 Aug 2026, 02:3510,211-53
14 Aug 2026, 16:1610,264-50
13 Aug 2026, 08:5410,314-61
12 Aug 2026, 06:3210,375-20
11 Aug 2026, 02:5610,395-1,280
10 Aug 2026, 04:2211,675first reading

Engagement

175 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
49.7%
avg views รท 10,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,300
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 175 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held175 (1 August 2026 โ€“ 28 August 2026)
Views total90,117
Reactions total1,481
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16,178 reactions across 175 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ”ฅ3,33220.6%
โค3,29820.4%
๐Ÿ‘3,25220.1%
๐Ÿ˜3,15319.5%
๐ŸŽ‰3,11019.2%
๐Ÿฅฐ110.068%
๐Ÿ‘80.049%
โšก40.025%
๐Ÿพ20.012%
๐Ÿ“10.006%
๐Ÿณ10.006%
๐Ÿ‘Œ10.006%
๐Ÿ‘Ž10.006%
๐Ÿ’Š10.006%
๐Ÿ’ฏ10.006%
๐Ÿ•Š10.006%
๐Ÿคฉ10.006%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 175 of the 175 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 16,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTCโ‰ˆ2,890 views118 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax

๐Ÿ”ฅ32๐Ÿ˜24๐Ÿ‘22๐ŸŽ‰21โค19

Signed Raymond

28 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTCโ‰ˆ7,090 views65 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @SOLPriceX

$ 103.37

๐Ÿ˜20๐Ÿ‘13๐Ÿ”ฅ12โค10๐ŸŽ‰10

Signed Raymond

28 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTCโ‰ˆ3,910 views116 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$ANSEM back at 390m and everyones too busy scanning random dogshit billions

๐Ÿ‘28๐Ÿ”ฅ23๐ŸŽ‰22๐Ÿ˜22โค21

Signed Raymond

28 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTCโ‰ˆ5,020 views82 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

insane chart. send it to 100m

โค21๐Ÿ”ฅ19๐ŸŽ‰18๐Ÿ‘13๐Ÿ˜11

Signed Raymond

28 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTCโ‰ˆ5,100 views116 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

quick reminder to use a trading app If your not using FOMO your missing out on a lot of money this cycle Mfs turning $100-$500K on there Heres the link to Download (10-40% off fees): https://fomo.family/r/Degens

โค27๐Ÿ˜25๐Ÿ‘23๐Ÿ”ฅ22๐ŸŽ‰19

Signed Raymond

27 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC47 views117 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

New ath on $FONE the fone.โ€ memecoin, watch your entries and DYOR fam. https://dexscreener.com/solana/3dcwhqJp6JBTJPq8ga335HWgSQVS7uQmdmeX7iGjMNpj CTPoyCwkjMvoJwU4xvZZqoD8tiYk6yDchySiN5gGpump

๐Ÿ”ฅ31๐Ÿ‘25๐Ÿ˜23๐ŸŽ‰20โค18

Signed Raymond

26 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTCโ‰ˆ5,200 views113 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax

๐Ÿ‘30๐Ÿ”ฅ29โค25๐Ÿ˜15๐ŸŽ‰14

Signed Raymond

26 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTCโ‰ˆ6,280 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ”ฅ14โค12๐Ÿ˜10๐ŸŽ‰8๐Ÿ‘7

Signed Raymond

26 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTCโ‰ˆ2,200 views53 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$SPURDO๐Ÿ”ฅ ็คพๅŒบ็œ‹่ตทๆฅๅšๅฎž่€Œๆœ‰่ถฃ๏ผŒ่ฎฉๆˆ‘ไปฌ็œ‹็œ‹ๅฎƒไผš่ตฐๅ‘ไฝ•ๆ–น๏ผŒๆœˆไบฎ่ฟ˜ๆ˜ฏๅฐ˜ๅŸƒ ็œ‹ไฝ ็š„ๆก็›ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฅROBINHOODๅˆ็บฆ: 0x6982e278A04B8C451f738727042d95565Fb47f33 CHART: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xe2e373698d104f9c4844bd62e96120c435fdfc51 X: https://t.me/Spurdo_R

๐Ÿ”ฅ19๐Ÿ‘13โค10๐ŸŽ‰7๐Ÿ˜4

Signed Raymond

26 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTCโ‰ˆ6,160 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐ŸŽ‰11๐Ÿ˜11๐Ÿ‘10โค8

Signed Raymond

26 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTCโ‰ˆ10,100 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$AI new ath

โค14๐ŸŽ‰11๐Ÿ‘10๐Ÿ”ฅ10๐Ÿ˜10

Signed Raymond

26 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTCโ‰ˆ5,380 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax

๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐ŸŽ‰13โค12๐Ÿ˜8๐Ÿ‘7

Signed Raymond

Showing the 12 most recent of 175 posts we hold for @ZoroChinese_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ZoroChinese_Calls edited 1 post after it first published โ€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

โ˜Ž๏ธ็†Š็Œซๆณต่ฅ้”€ๆธ ้“ (PANDA MARKETING &CALLS[TRX ETH SOL BSC TON]๐Ÿˆต โ›ฉ๏ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
@pandacallslonge3 ยท 56,390
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here โ€” alongside 85 others โ€” read 24 August 2026
ไธญๅ›ฝๅฏ†็ ้ฒธๅ…ฌๅธ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿš€๐ŸŒ–
@ChinapumpWXC ยท 107,016
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 14 August 2026
๐ŸณCHINESE CRYPTO WHALES ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ท ๐Ÿณ || ๅคง้ฏจ้ญš
@WHALESPUMPBANK ยท 23,033
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here โ€” alongside 78 others โ€” read 18 September 2026
โ€‹ แ—ฐแ—ฉYแ—ทแ—ฉแ‘•แ•ผ ้ฒธ้ฑผ ๐Ÿ’ฎ
@maybac_whales ยท 56,172
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
๐“๐€๐Š๐€๐๐€ ๐„๐“๐‡ ๐’๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ž ๐Š๐จ๐ฅ๐ฌ๐Ÿช
@takanaeth101 ยท 32,403
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here โ€” alongside 73 others โ€” read 2 September 2026
๐ŸณCODY WHALES CALL ไธญๅœ‹๐Ÿณ
@CODYWHALESCALLS ยท 198,032
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here โ€” alongside 90 others โ€” read 11 August 2026
CGT ASIAN COMMUNITY
@ChineasswhalesCGT ยท 35,382
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 65 here โ€” alongside 64 others โ€” read 1 September 2026
โ˜Ž๏ธไธญๅ›ฝๅฎ็Ÿณ-ๅŒšๅ„ไธจๅ‡ ไน‡ไธ‚ไน‡๐Ÿณ
@cryptogems55552 ยท 115,587
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here โ€” alongside 92 others โ€” read 14 August 2026
็œ‹ๆถจไธญๅœ‹ไบบ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ DRAGON CALL โ˜
@Chinese_dragon_calls ยท 72,485
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 24 August 2026
GEMS OF CCCCN|| ไธญๅ›ฝๅŠ ๅฏ†่ทจ้“พ็ฝ‘็ปœ||
@CHINAGEMOFCCCN ยท 102,005
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here โ€” alongside 91 others โ€” read 18 August 2026
Angry Birds Callsโ„ข๐Ÿ“ข
@Angrybirdscalls ยท 29,126
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here โ€” alongside 79 others โ€” read 4 September 2026
DeFi Doxx Calls
@Defidoxxcalls ยท 31,564
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 76 here โ€” alongside 75 others โ€” read 5 September 2026
๐™๐„๐”๐’ ๐†๐„๐Œ ๐Ÿ’Ž
@zeus_gem ยท 69,380
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here โ€” alongside 80 others โ€” read 21 August 2026
Crypto 100X Gems ๐Ÿšจ๏ธ
@TheCrypto100XGems ยท 24,711
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here โ€” alongside 78 others โ€” read 9 September 2026
Shakers Calls
@marine_CryptoCalls ยท 72,306
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here โ€” alongside 90 others โ€” read 20 August 2026
๐˜พ๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™‹๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™๐™– ๐™‚๐™š๐™ข๐™จ๐Ÿ’Ž
@CryptoPandaGems_1 ยท 37,980
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 1 September 2026
MiniDraft Calls
@minidraftcalls ยท 70,832
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here โ€” alongside 92 others โ€” read 20 August 2026
๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ’ŽGEMHUNTER๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿš€
@Gemhunterrs ยท 766,798
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here โ€” alongside 92 others โ€” read 8 August 2026
Tesla Calls Official
@Teslacallsofficial ยท 65,496
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 76 here โ€” alongside 75 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
๐‚๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ญ๐จ ๐’๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ ๐†๐ž๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€
@CryptoSuper_Gems ยท 25,987
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here โ€” alongside 77 others โ€” read 8 September 2026
Crypto King Call
@Crypto_KingCall ยท 96,765
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here โ€” alongside 90 others โ€” read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ‹้ฒธ้ฑผ๏ผŒๆŠ•่ต„่€…ไน‹ๅฎถ ZOROโ˜Ž๏ธ๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿ“ขโ€ (@ZoroChinese_Calls), 10,665 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZoroChinese_Calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.