Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cishajias/ 慈善家/Philanthropist ✨慈善家 🐼🇨🇳 🫍

Channel

Cishajias/ 慈善家/Philanthropist ✨慈善家 🐼🇨🇳 🫍

@OLYMPUSCCALLS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,215subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002270290702
TypeChannel
Username@OLYMPUSCCALLS
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OLYMPUSCCALLS

Growth

10,21410,26410,2397 August 2026 — 10,264 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,263 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,255 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,254 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,257 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,262 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,258 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,255 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,251 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,255 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,257 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,251 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,235 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,226 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,219 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,214 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers10,2157 August 202630 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,207–10,272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 02:5410,215+1
29 Aug 2026, 03:5910,214-5
28 Aug 2026, 00:4710,219-7
26 Aug 2026, 22:3710,226-9
25 Aug 2026, 23:1210,235-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:4310,237-9
23 Aug 2026, 07:1710,246-5
21 Aug 2026, 16:2810,251-6
20 Aug 2026, 11:3410,257+2
19 Aug 2026, 13:2210,255-1
18 Aug 2026, 14:0310,256+5
17 Aug 2026, 12:4310,251-4
16 Aug 2026, 05:4510,255-3
14 Aug 2026, 17:3610,258-4
13 Aug 2026, 05:1810,262+5
12 Aug 2026, 04:5310,257+3
11 Aug 2026, 06:2110,254-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:5010,255-3
9 Aug 2026, 09:5110,258-5
8 Aug 2026, 12:4610,263first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.8%
avg views ÷ 10,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,880
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held67 (17 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total317,230
Reactions total7,213
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7,327 reactions across 66 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,51920.7%
😁1,47820.2%
👍1,46420.0%
🔥1,43619.6%
🎉1,40819.2%
🐳160.218%
👏30.041%
❤‍🔥20.027%
🍾10.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC≈4,560 views117 reactionsread 29 August 2026

New ath on $FONE the fone.” memecoin, watch your entries and DYOR fam. https://dexscreener.com/solana/3dcwhqJp6JBTJPq8ga335HWgSQVS7uQmdmeX7iGjMNpj CTPoyCwkjMvoJwU4xvZZqoD8tiYk6yDchySiN5gGpump

👍30🎉27🔥23😁2314

26 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈4,270 views115 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$十八bro 这只在香港 7-Eleven 偷薯片并因此爆红的“黑猫”正在引发热议 > 它可能成为下一个爆火的潜力项目,Binance China(币安中文)也发文提到了它。 https://x.com/binancezh/status/2092416864005898705 K线图:https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x7a1b5f9e71e497f6265c63108d0f314d23c6deb4

🎉3025😁22🔥20👍17🐳1

26 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC≈5,490 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

👀 $PISTACIO 开发者已经接手了该项目,正在进行内容创作,并且有动力持续推动其发展。 这就是看好它的逻辑。让我们拭目以待它能走多远。 https://dexscreener.com/solana/22CfmLna8Bsh7xrbyvGSs6NdD31iFj1UFVnwB7EberWU 请务必自行研究(DYOR)。

🎉13🔥12😁12👍116

25 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈6,480 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026

BTC is making a strong move today, pushing toward new highs and bringing fresh momentum back into the market.

👍2112🎉8🔥7😁7🐳1

25 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈6,220 views65 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @BTCPriceX

$ 80,562.09

22🎉14👍11🔥9😁8🐳1

24 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC≈6,360 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$HOOKR hit new ATH 🚀 We are 8X now. Thank you to everyone holding. We are just getting started.

😁1814🔥11🎉10👍7🐳1

22 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,330 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @BTCPriceX

$ 77,296.00

👍20😁129🎉8🔥5🐳1

22 Aug 2026, 02:43 UTC≈5,390 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: Spot Bitcoin & Ethereum ETF volume surpasses $7.5 billion today. @WatcherGuru

🔥17🎉1110😁9👍8🐳1

22 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC≈1,680 views110 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

WojakCoin - 2017 年最初的 Meme Coin,复活 2025 年。真正的公平发射(0% Premine)、SHA-256 PoW、44m 上限供应、2 分钟块、DGW 难度。 专为认同 Wojak 的互联网社区而打造。 现在桥接和包装以实现 EVM 兼容性! 交易无缝地在dex上包裹wojakcoin。 原始的链上挖掘 + 现代实用程序:网络钱包、浏览器和不断发展的生态系统。 社区驱动的真正的 Wojak-No 地毯的复兴,只是 Wojaks。 加入革命。 CA:0x867340CFC92A771CD3CFFCFF056A84490CADE7C0 社交 TG:https://t.me/Wojakcoin2017 X: https://x.com/wojakcoin2017

🔥26👍24😁23🎉1817🐳2

21 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈5,400 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$PUMP chart breaking out so fast 2x on spot so far, long printing hard 0.005 next congrats if you followed me

15🔥12👍11🎉10😁7🐳1

21 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC≈1,630 views65 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

$BTC JUST BROKE $73,000 🚀 SEND EVERYTHING HIGHER !!

😁1813👍13🔥13🎉7🐳1

20 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTCviews —

Cishajias/ 慈善家/Philanthropist ✨慈善家 🐼🇨🇳 🫍 pinned «Shill me those play you got !! SEND ME YOUR $TICKER DM @cishanjiax»

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @OLYMPUSCCALLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cishajias/ 慈善家/Philanthropist ✨慈善家 🐼🇨🇳 🫍” (@OLYMPUSCCALLS), 10,215 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OLYMPUSCCALLS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.