20x

Channel
TimeFlies Degeneracy Journal
@TimeFliesCalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,594subscribers
+10,044 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001739434475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TimeFliesCalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TimeFliesCalls |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:17 | 19,594 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:38 | 19,599 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:58 | 19,600 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 19,608 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 19,611 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 19,615 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 19,621 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 19,626 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 19,630 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:54 | 19,634 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:30 | 19,635 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:35 | 19,642 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:35 | 19,644 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:18 | 19,651 | -6 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 19,657 | +10,502 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 9,155 | -21 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 9,176 | -23 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 9,199 | -26 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 9,225 | -26 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 9,251 | first reading |
Engagement
168 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 168 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
After 6months
Guess what’s mooning ?
Achievement Unlocked: x18! ⚡️ @TimeFliesCalls made a x18+ call on 龙虾. $2.8M ➡️ $51M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Auto-buy and sell calls like this through SpyDefi Filters!
3Jv1aPhXrGbNiZpgb1w66EnrVZAvfD3HZfthsGhQpump
Achievement Unlocked: x3! ☝️ @TimeFliesCalls made a x3+ call on Robinhood Cats. $272K ➡️ $836K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🟣 MarsCoin - TRENDING #2
Join here let’s print
Time Flies Degeneracy pinned «https://t.me/+kYJ1DNB5MwxmNGNh»
https://t.me/+kYJ1DNB5MwxmNGNh
Achievement Unlocked: x8! ⚡️ @TimeFliesCalls made a x8+ call on CyberLeek. $2.4M ➡️ $20M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🪶 HMM - TRENDING #1
Achievement Unlocked: x4! 🖖 @TimeFliesCalls made a x4+ call on CyberLeek. $2.4M ➡️ $10M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🟣 KII - TRENDING #1
Achievement Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @TimeFliesCalls made a x2+ call on Snek . $48K ➡️ $101K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🪶 FLUSH - TRENDING #1
Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @TimeFliesCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TimeFliesCalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 31 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptogems55552 · 122,502
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@ChinapumpWXC · 107,037
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@CHINAGEMOFCCCN · 98,537
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 223,243
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@Chinese_dragon_calls · 104,766
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@topresale · 81,703
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@marine_CryptoCalls · 70,800
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@zeus_gem · 58,053
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@minidraftcalls · 75,681
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@sitnikova_travel · 232,559
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@airdropcomic · 375,167
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@Crypto_KingCall · 91,854
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TimeFlies Degeneracy Journal” (@TimeFliesCalls), 19,594 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TimeFliesCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.