Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for the js cult 🔱

Channel

the js cult 🔱

@jsdao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34,614subscribers

-1,399 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002067695602
TypeChannel
Username@jsdao
DescriptionOwners: @sweep0x & @jeremyton We will NEVER DM you ALWAYS DYOR. NFA. twitter.com/0xSweep twitter.com/Jeremybtc
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/jsdao

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,61438,03336,323.57 August 2026 — 36,013 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,010 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,991 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,980 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,964 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,942 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,931 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,903 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,883 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,847 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,846 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,830 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,817 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,810 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,774 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35,735 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,731 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,721 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,720 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,697 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,685 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,653 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,622 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,124 subscribers3 September 2026 — 36,189 subscribers5 September 2026 — 37,906 subscribers8 September 2026 — 37,841 subscribers11 September 2026 — 37,815 subscribers13 September 2026 — 37,770 subscribers14 September 2026 — 38,033 subscribers16 September 2026 — 37,972 subscribers19 September 2026 — 37,939 subscribers26 September 2026 — 35,504 subscribers4 October 2026 — 35,018 subscribers9 October 2026 — 34,921 subscribers13 October 2026 — 34,827 subscribers14 October 2026 — 34,782 subscribers15 October 2026 — 34,752 subscribers16 October 2026 — 34,731 subscribers17 October 2026 — 34,709 subscribers18 October 2026 — 34,688 subscribers19 October 2026 — 34,672 subscribers21 October 2026 — 34,643 subscribers22 October 2026 — 34,614 subscribers7 August 202622 October 2026
44 measurements spanning 76 days, net -1,399. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,101–38,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 08:2134,614-29
21 Oct 2026, 03:1934,643-29
19 Oct 2026, 22:0034,672-16
18 Oct 2026, 20:0934,688-21
17 Oct 2026, 21:5534,709-22
16 Oct 2026, 21:1534,731-21
15 Oct 2026, 18:5834,752-30
14 Oct 2026, 15:4534,782-45
13 Oct 2026, 05:4034,827-94
9 Oct 2026, 01:3734,921-97
4 Oct 2026, 15:3635,018-486
26 Sept 2026, 14:4035,504-2,435
19 Sept 2026, 11:5737,939-33
16 Sept 2026, 23:2037,972-61
14 Sept 2026, 21:5738,033+263
13 Sept 2026, 05:2137,770-45
11 Sept 2026, 08:0137,815-26
8 Sept 2026, 13:1837,841-65
5 Sept 2026, 06:2037,906+1,717
3 Sept 2026, 09:3736,189first reading

Engagement

256 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 34,614 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,080
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 256 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026
Posts held256 (5 August 2026 – 20 October 2026)
Views total45,690
Reactions total608
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Oct 2026, 10:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,220
Videos
≈159
Links
≈2,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 14s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,956 reactions across 255 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯4,23435.4%
⚡2,77723.2%
❤1,78414.9%
🐳1,56413.1%
🔥6835.71%
💔2321.94%
😭2061.72%
👍1671.40%
🏆1231.03%
😁400.335%
❤‍🔥360.301%
🤯230.192%
custom 5465277190453085073210.176%
🍾210.176%
👏100.084%
🤝90.075%
👀60.05%
🙏60.05%
🎉50.042%
😈40.033%
2 further kinds50.042%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 255 of the 256 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,956 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 255 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jsdao. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 256 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 20 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Oct 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,490 views30 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Gulag beta is now LIVE The PvP arena where trading becomes a sport > Trade live price feeds offchain > Buy into tournaments and climb the leaderboards It’s you VS you, skill is your ONLY edge Free tournament entry → https://beta.gulag.xyz https://x.com/gulagxyz/status/2112559698767700033?s=20

🐳21❤3🔥3😭3

Signed Jeremy

9 Oct 2026, 21:14 UTC≈3,010 views64 reactionsread 22 October 2026

About to land back in dubai after token2049 Time for generational lock in

🔥34❤18💯7💔4⚡1

Signed Jeremy

9 Oct 2026, 21:13 UTC≈9,020 views49 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Exactly one year ago today crypto experienced its BIGGEST liquidation in history Happy 10/10 to those who celebrate Hopefully we don’t go for round 2 in the next 24 hours

❤35⚡10💯4

Signed Jeremy

29 Sept 2026, 00:29 UTC≈5,700 views88 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

US treasury yield is getting out of hand This is getting absurd

🐳63❤10😭9💯5💔1

Signed Jeremy

28 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC≈4,130 views35 reactions1 Starread 22 October 2026
Photo

For the next 2 days, if you deposit on metawin.com you earn part of their $1M drop this month Make sure you go take advantage If you get lucky you’ll turn $1 into $12k like this But at a minimum, you earn part of the drop

💯19❤10⚡6

Signed Jeremy

28 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTC≈9,000 views91 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Anticipating a green day tomorrow

🐳63💯15😭8⚡5

Signed Jeremy

27 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC≈3,910 views88 reactions10 Starsread 22 October 2026

$9.25 > $14

💯46⚡30❤12

Signed 0xSweep

27 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC≈4,020 views87 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯40⚡34❤11🔥2

Signed 0xSweep

24 Sept 2026, 11:27 UTC≈5,410 views76 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Binance finally folded and decided to list HyperLiquid They better not have topped $HYPE here 😭💀

💯51⚡10💔9❤6

Signed Jeremy

22 Sept 2026, 18:10 UTC≈5,090 views63 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Crypto’s Fear & Greed Index is now at 79 “Greed” Total crypto market cap is almost back at $3 TRILLION again Everything is starting to look good again This better not be another trap

💯46❤17

Signed Jeremy

21 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC≈3,160 views21 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: $87,000 Bitcoin @WatcherGuru

🔥14❤7

Signed Jeremy

21 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC≈3,900 views50 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is now back above $86,000

💯32⚡9❤9

Signed Jeremy

Showing the 12 most recent of 256 posts we hold for @jsdao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“the js cult 🔱” (@jsdao), 34,614 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jsdao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.