Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FRENS GEMS 💎

Channel

FRENS GEMS 💎

@FrenzGems

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,092subscribers

-65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001975392115
TypeChannel
Username@FrenzGems
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FrenzGems

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,0925,1665,1297 August 2026 — 5,157 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,166 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,158 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,157 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,150 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,146 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,148 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,142 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,152 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,142 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,115 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,125 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,109 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,092 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,081–5,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:365,092-17
15 Sept 2026, 04:185,109-16
11 Sept 2026, 18:415,125+10
7 Sept 2026, 02:385,115-27
2 Sept 2026, 14:035,142-10
30 Aug 2026, 08:285,152+10
26 Aug 2026, 21:455,142-6
24 Aug 2026, 04:235,148+2
20 Aug 2026, 12:045,146-4
17 Aug 2026, 14:375,150-7
14 Aug 2026, 18:045,157-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:125,158-8
8 Aug 2026, 09:015,166+9
7 Aug 2026, 09:455,157first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 51 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026

slowly climbing, just need more eyes, all proofs shared clearly

12 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC23 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://x.ai/_next/static/chunks/42fak_zm5_c89.css?dpl=18e58718cb1732925af7c225b56876b729d6e365 here is the link to the sources code on the website of the new bot enjoy

12 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/cb_doge/status/2087313113230000204?s=20 https://x.com/XFreeze/status/2087332206213542103?s=20 so 95% name is baby grok XAI and elon will tweet abt it soon

12 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC26 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1946763642231500856?s=20 and elon also talked abt it

12 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC55 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

i just found this maybe really the truth behind the new bot of xAi first the dev of cursor who behind the bot building it call it baby grok https://x.com/leerob/status/2087358412082569503?s=20 second if u enter the website of grok bot and enter the developer page (https://x.ai/bot) u will see this as the name of class and its the only name, im also tried to find any other companion name but not found so, your

12 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC26 viewsread 12 August 2026

Gjog4G67BbJZfVhD9M93SEncd47rvbFVcGcuaufpump this bear all over media maybe will send like bop

11 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC39 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @elonvitalikalerts

🦶 elonmusk followed bot Grok Bot (bot) 1 Following | 15 Followers AI teammates that you can give real work to. 📍 null 🔗 http://x.ai/bot

Signed Mackerz

11 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC59 viewsread 12 August 2026

Migrated https://dexscreener.com/solana/ACNQhqBXVhW3sX7wwd3mPM2Z46zpp6kpcysv3bwojdFj

Signed Mackerz

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @FrenzGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,807
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
Veigar Calls
@veigarcalls · 25,048
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 🐧
@brookcalls · 32,782
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Gems Mine
@MineGems · 31,155
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL · 90,836
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Crypto Gems 🚀📈🌟
@cryptogems555 · 24,183
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
🦁 LION JUNGLE ✖️ by @LionCALL 🦁 (Gambles)
@LionJUNGLE · 33,476
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Meta caller
@metacaller · 42,513
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Call Analyser (SOL Only)
@CallAnalyserSol · 26,000
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
BagCalls 🎒🎒🎒
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Bigbull Official Calls™
@Bigbulloficial · 86,918
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
中国密码鲸公司 🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖
@ChinapumpWXC · 107,016
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FRENS GEMS 💎” (@FrenzGems), 5,092 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FrenzGems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.