Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Luigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls

Channel

Luigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls

@luigiscalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,605subscribers

+398 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001218247352
TypeChannel
Username@luigiscalls
DescriptionExperienced BSC Trader, Give my calls a try. Won’t call anything that I believe won’t benefit my community For business contact @yormanv1 @luigiscalls1 @TowerG00d Co-Owner : @yormanv1 Gambles channel is https://t.me/LuigisGambles
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/luigiscalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,2078,6058,4067 August 2026 — 8,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,209 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,210 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,234 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,229 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,256 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,240 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,237 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,351 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,401 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,384 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,356 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,366 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,334 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,300 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,268 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,252 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,475 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,570 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,554 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,575 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,581 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,605 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 89 days, net +398. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,147–8,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 11:588,605+24
1 Nov 2026, 05:008,581+6
29 Oct 2026, 02:398,575+21
26 Oct 2026, 04:368,554-16
22 Oct 2026, 19:208,570+95
19 Oct 2026, 14:088,475+223
16 Oct 2026, 19:388,252-16
13 Oct 2026, 13:178,268-32
7 Oct 2026, 13:178,300-34
30 Sept 2026, 19:408,334-32
16 Sept 2026, 06:398,366+10
12 Sept 2026, 11:208,356-28
8 Sept 2026, 00:398,384-17
2 Sept 2026, 19:598,401+50
30 Aug 2026, 10:038,351+114
27 Aug 2026, 18:168,237-3
24 Aug 2026, 19:578,240-16
21 Aug 2026, 05:438,256+27
17 Aug 2026, 20:478,229-5
14 Aug 2026, 17:358,234first reading

Engagement

138 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.46%
avg views ÷ 8,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
297
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 138 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held138 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total6,247
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 22:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,850
Videos
≈229
Links
≈5,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

250 reactions across 89 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤21485.6%
🔥156.00%
👍83.20%
🥰72.80%
😁31.20%
👏10.4%
🤔10.4%
🤩10.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC40 viewsread 5 November 2026

Can start a push F7AjrMsNQvNqYy6GMez4cfoq5LYq3xJ6FwaTchL4pump

1 Nov 2026, 22:04 UTC161 viewsread 5 November 2026

FZs4YUPyD5sMzUv5fwiWBQx3s9Nzgvw62g8ytohwpump aped this

Signed Fernando Rodriguez

28 Oct 2026, 19:59 UTC273 viewsread 5 November 2026

7Y6QNhQ2FxL6JEqZHooqgkXQubeQNC6N9emJxytdWp65 aped this

Signed Fernando Rodriguez

25 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTC351 viewsread 5 November 2026

Br6XDTEMNb476dc4YvQ4RaGQe4xufk9K7fwUYWau5WZs aped this

Signed Fernando Rodriguez

23 Oct 2026, 20:14 UTC375 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

GZYL4JVHikj6H71a7mTdWay1q7DwsWdJFEhkQCsYz4WT aped this

❤5

Signed Fernando Rodriguez

22 Oct 2026, 19:21 UTC356 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026

HQZzSod31TArVJRmZrnevNw6cpN3tZ9BzpovUtBNQWP7 aped this

❤1

Signed Fernando Rodriguez

21 Oct 2026, 18:21 UTC327 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026

3Uo9Fy5EPozmmdAcNWbYr9mXnvzAo6Y298wruh6Spump same wallet launched kimchi

🤔1

Signed Fernando Rodriguez

21 Oct 2026, 18:07 UTC290 viewsread 5 November 2026

DQL6Rc58bfX2Vo1sWKRn1fPmGARQNS7fKALGApwTTsWB aped this

Signed Fernando Rodriguez

18 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC360 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

I'M ACTUALLY SHAKING Turned deposit 2000$ into $on my HUGEST WIN Link: duelbet.com/c/yaq7tu maybe you will win like me , also here HUGE welcome bonus up to 500% Been on duelbet the last few days and ngl the odds hit different, feels like it pays out way more than anywhere else ive touched

Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @luigiscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@luigiscalls edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bruisers Calls
@bruiserscalls · 31,112
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Veigar Calls
@veigarcalls · 26,092
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls · 25,875
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Gogeta Crypto Chad$
@gogetacalls · 59,143
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 🐧
@brookcalls · 29,781
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
𝐆𝐎𝐋𝐃 𝐃𝐈𝐆𝐆𝐄𝐑’𝐒 𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐒
@golddigerscalls · 22,460
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
- BSC -
@lowtaxbsc · 42,128
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Maybach Calls
@MaybachCalls · 31,789
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
- SOL -
@lowtaxsolana · 38,765
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Furious Plays
@furiousplays · 18,267
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 September 2026
BATMAN GEMS 🦇
@batman_gem · 19,576
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
Gems Mine
@MineGems · 21,333
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens · 23,277
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
Shyroshi Gambles
@SHYROSHIGAMBLES · 24,203
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 October 2026
Koba's Calls
@kobascalls · 30,415
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,577
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Crypto Gems 🚀📈🌟
@cryptogems555 · 23,605
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Luigi’s SOL, ETH & BSC Alpha Calls” (@luigiscalls), 8,605 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luigiscalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.