Chinese Pump 我会啊了啊 alpha calls pinned a GIF

Channel
Chinese Pump 我会啊了啊 alpha calls
@Chinesewhalespump
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
32,844subscribers
+28,522 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001985076624 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chinesewhalespump |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chinesewhalespump |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 23:55 | 32,844 | -15 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:38 | 32,859 | -21 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:20 | 32,880 | -13 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 32,893 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 32,898 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:17 | 32,907 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:34 | 32,911 | -14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 32,925 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 32,939 | -21 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 32,960 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 32,967 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:15 | 32,976 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 32,994 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 33,000 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 32,999 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 33,010 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 33,011 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 33,014 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 33,020 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 33,022 | first reading |
Engagement
448 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.8%
- avg views ÷ 32,844 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,530
- 58 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 61
- of 448 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 448 (22 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 204,852 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 22:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 35s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 61 posts held from the last 30 days (3.28%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
SNAO ($SNAO) — 官方营销信息 项目:SNAO — Raging Sardine 官方网站:https://snao.world 区块链:BNB 智能链 (BSC) 总供应量:200,000,000 SNAO 初始公开发售价格:0.001 美元/SNAO 公开发售额度:最高 45,000,000 SNAO 关于 SNAO SNAO 正在构建一个由人工智能驱动的区块链情报生态系统,旨在帮助用户更好地了解加密货币市场及链上活动。 我们的愿景远不止于一个传统的“模因币”(Meme Token)。 该生态系统的路线图包括: • SNAO Guardian:区块链安全监控与风险预警。 • SNAO Trace:链上资金流向追踪与分析。 • SNAO Flow:鲸鱼动向、智能资金(Smart Money)活动及流动性情报。 • Sardine AI:基于人工智能的市场洞察与分析。 上述产品均属于我们的开发路线图范畴…
Accomplishment Unlocked: x8! ⚡️ @Chinesewhalespump made a x8+ call on COGE🟣 $2.9M ➡️ $23.2M 📱 Screener 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 👁 KOL ⭐ Become a KOL on KOLScreener
Accomplishment Unlocked: x7! ⚡️ @Chinesewhalespump made a x7+ call on COGE🟣 $2.9M ➡️ $20.3M 📱 Screener 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 👁 KOL 📢 NEW: Turn any CA into a call post · @KOLScreenerPostBot
Accomplishment Unlocked: x2! ✌️ @Chinesewhalespump made a x2+ call on COGE🟣 $2.9M ➡️ $5.8M 📱 Screener 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 👁 KOL 📲 Open the Screener, our platform inside Telegram
https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/BlRuyRK8_EFWotn2UtV2c5QXMMHbSzmyrkU7wnfj7VpkNQGr1wk1z
$PANGEA 只需幾秒鐘即可創建可在所有主流區塊鏈上同步存在的代幣。 隆重推出由 LayerZero 提供支援的通用流動性池。 Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xcfe04bc182706f8683f4f486104b52fb6a4115cfe9e4471c468fca65703f9b9d ROBINHOOD: 0x30de7AE4c9578D110a97367EDe9F7765Cdce06ea Website: https://www.pangea.trade/
$COGE COGECOIN 是 Solana 平台上的一個社群概念幣。與紐約市、任何市長、狗狗幣或任何政府機構均無關聯。並非證券。加密貨幣波動性極大——切勿投入您無法承受損失的資金。請自行研究。祝您玩得開心。謹慎蓋章。 Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/8gjmy6ipysxfmwwrpu9c7atssorjg6al88d9xttzslqe Sol Contract: 8UQdy5sHMVWUWSHeA5B3ZuuAVNumjSLPXdf19MXcpump Website: https://www.cogecoin.world/
硅谷想要你的内存,而一个人决定绝不交出哪怕一吉字节。在埃隆·马斯克宣称“人民也配拥有自己的内存!”之后,互联网陷入了一场荒诞的新战争:AI公司与只想正常使用电脑的普通人之间的对抗。随着AI行业消耗的计算资源日益庞大,科技巨头觊觎每个人个人内存的想法成为了完美的网络笑料。 登场的是 $RAMBO —— 最后的内存守护者,一位虚构的、身经百战的玩家,他将地下室改造成了军事堡垒,以保护他珍贵的64GB内存。他头戴红色头带,身穿装满DDR5内存条的战术背心,并对硅谷怀有非理性的仇恨。 RAMBO只有一个使命:保护人类运行47个Chrome标签页并游玩《过山车大亨》的权利,而不必将其内存拱手让给AI霸主。 他们可以拿走我的GPU。但不能拿走我的内存。 项目信息 ℹ️ 📱| 推特链接 📱| 网站链接 🦅| 图表链接 🪙| KMifrkYmDdAKtVXAVBEPEQxJ7qP2iLgUcfZjUZipump
Accomplishment Unlocked: First Light! ☀️ @Chinesewhalespump called SI🪶 first, before anyone else - now x13+. $265K ➡️ $3.5M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 👁 KOL ⭐ Become a KOL on KOLScreener
🔥 $HELL 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 CA🔥: A75Xx6SeftAmWduv9KGwb2GCjXUAhxozcCUCys9jpump http://dextools.io/app/solana/pair-explorer/EwsYHiuznyNqH5f65YpfsoQBLq2KyETuvhm5un7wsfDG 🔥 https://x.com/hellhoundmeme
Accomplishment Unlocked: x6! ⚡️ @Chinesewhalespump made a x6+ call on H081🟣 $84K ➡️ $504K 📱 Screener 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 👁 KOL 📢 NEW: KOLScreener Post · drop a CA, get the call post
Showing the 12 most recent of 448 posts we hold for @Chinesewhalespump. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 16 posts on @Chinesewhalespump as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 11
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@maestro · 28,70339 postsWIZARD SCAN
@WIZARD_SCAN_BOT · 14,11439 postsWIZARD SCAN Live
@WizardScan · 23,46930 postsKOLScreener
@kolscreener · 14,35220 postsMaestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,5303 posts$SHOPINX COMMUNITY
@shopinxchat · 23,4852 postsWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,0412 postsALIVE PORTAL
@alivecoinportal · 31 postBLASTAR | ENTRY
@blastarbnb · 601 postBuddy on BNB
@BuddyPortal · 3591 postChilleez - Gateway
@ChilleezCommunity · 851 postChump Coin Official Announcement Channel
@CHUMPCOIN21B · 9,9581 postCOCORO - First COCORO on ETH
@Cocoro_ethereum · 8591 postcoloneltoadcoinportal
@ColonelToadCoinPortal · 31 post$GTAVI Portal
@GTAVI_Network · 3981 postHe Hua Panda - Entry
@hehuapanda · 2481 post$JOE Announcements
@joecoinportal · 2,0961 postKOLscope
@KOLscope · 35,5581 postlunarlad
@Lunarladsol · 1,4841 post$MIU Portal
@miuportal · 1931 postorangecoinonsol
@OrangeCoinOnSOL · 191 postPONS | pons . family
@PONSDOTFAMILY · 5,4701 posttoadtard
@toadtard · 161 posttoescoin
@ToesCoinChat · 8521 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Chinesewhalespump named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 16 posts, 27 September 2026 – 5 November 2026
named in 2 posts, 30 September 2026 – 1 October 2026
named in 1 post, 6 November 2026 – 6 November 2026
named in 1 post, 3 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
named in 1 post, 30 August 2026 – 30 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chinese Pump 我会啊了啊 alpha calls” (@Chinesewhalespump), 32,844 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chinesewhalespump.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.