Bot
WIZARD SCAN
@WIZARD_SCAN_BOT
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
14,114monthly users
-2,939 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | 8874239833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Bot |
| Username | @WIZARD_SCAN_BOT |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 6 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WIZARD_SCAN_BOT |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Monthly users | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 14,114 | -2,980 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 17,094 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 17,094 | +37 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 17,057 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 17,053 | first reading |
Engagement
No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.
Mentions
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@WizardScan · 23,4692,198 postsCRYPTO RAVEN CALL
@CRYPTO_RAVEN_CALL · 26,24786 posts☎️熊猫泵营销渠道 (PANDA MARKETING &CALLS[TRX ETH SOL BSC TON]🈵 ⛩️🇨🇳
@pandacallslonge3 · 55,35476 posts ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 鲸鱼 💮
@maybac_whales · 45,07166 postsTesla Calls®
@Teslacallsofficial · 70,79549 postsAcid Call { 跨链项目推广者 }
@Acid_Call · 7,38545 postsChinese Pump 我会啊了啊 alpha calls
@Chinesewhalespump · 32,84439 postsBIG WHALES CALL
@Big_Whale_call · 53,13035 postsChris Journal ™️
@christophersalpha · 53,58735 postsGlobal Explore Calls 📉📈
@GlobalExploreCalls · 26,75932 posts𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐀 #𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 广告
@sinatrending · 22,96330 posts𝙋𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙞 𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐬
@pappicallsgems · 57,57425 posts🐳CHINESE CRYPTO WHALES 🇨🇳🇨🇳💷 🐳 || 大鯨魚
@WHALESPUMPBANK · 23,19225 posts𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐞𝐅𝐢 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 ☎💯
@CryptoDefi_Calls · 24,08721 postsBigBangCalls
@BigBangCall · 16,90019 postsDeFi Doxx Calls
@Defidoxxcalls · 34,40319 postsMini Bang Calls
@MiniBangCall · 7,70613 postsЛюбитель собак 🐶
@CH1RO0 · 10,85312 postsLoyal
@lOOoyalLlLl · 312 postsPHILLIP’S CALLS
@PHILLIPSGEMSCALLS · 5,69112 postsLizard Calls ⛳️💎
@LizardCall · 29,18411 posts𝗖𝗮𝗽𝗿𝗶 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀 💎🎯
@CapriCalls · 38,74210 postsDefiape Gamble
@DeFiApeGamble · 9,40610 posts太初链纪 $GCC
@GenesisChainLog · 43,2748 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WIZARD SCAN” (@WIZARD_SCAN_BOT), 14,114 monthly users as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WIZARD_SCAN_BOT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.