Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Acid Call { 跨链项目推广者 }

Channel

Acid Call { 跨链项目推广者 }

@Acid_Call

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,388subscribers

-269 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001870237731
TypeChannel
Username@Acid_Call
Description多链项目推广 | 从ETH到SOL,从BNB到BASE | 只发我敢上的项目 全链项目推广专家 | 精准中文社区覆盖 | 合作请私聊 (Cross-chain project promotion expert | Reach targeted Chinese crypto communities | DM for collaboration) Owner @Charlesj54
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Acid_Call

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

11.0 average views per post against 7,388 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.149%. Across the 39,880 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers — the middle half sit between 5.36% and 23.1%, with a median of 11.8%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured38 of 38 published in the window (38 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled418
Mature posts only0.167% over 27 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers7,388 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb3162 · 39,880 channels · p10 2.28% · p25 5.36% · p50 11.8% · p75 23.1% · p90 38.8%
Position in cohort0.772th percentile · 1/77 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.039% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,3887,6577,522.56 August 2026 — 7,657 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,657 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,527 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,525 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,519 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,513 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,511 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,506 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,508 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,503 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,489 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,480 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,442 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,428 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,419 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,416 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,408 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,403 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,400 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,398 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,390 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,388 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 91 days, net -269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,348–7,697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 00:497,388-2
2 Nov 2026, 03:287,390-8
27 Oct 2026, 15:477,398-2
24 Oct 2026, 14:467,400-3
21 Oct 2026, 11:017,403-5
18 Oct 2026, 12:477,408-8
15 Oct 2026, 03:287,416-3
12 Oct 2026, 04:587,419-9
5 Oct 2026, 06:387,428-14
27 Sept 2026, 05:407,442-38
15 Sept 2026, 13:007,480-9
8 Sept 2026, 02:377,489-14
2 Sept 2026, 18:097,503-5
31 Aug 2026, 00:427,508+2
27 Aug 2026, 22:237,506-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:367,511-2
21 Aug 2026, 18:577,513-6
18 Aug 2026, 19:487,519-6
15 Aug 2026, 19:557,525-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:077,527first reading

Engagement

249 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.144%
avg views ÷ 7,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.6
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
57
of 249 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held249 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total607
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 00:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,280
Videos
≈123
Links
≈1,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 57 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 00:47 UTC3 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $LATE SOL 链新项目,发布于 26 分钟前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $26.5K | 24h成交量: $159.8K | 24h涨跌: -49.6% 合约地址: 9irzXvqHLGdCXkHxQD9ZTZFbeYRVmBg1cT2oT7ppump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/hrmdrdlbgdlsbjkb77kyeb4buxsgsiapwfgbqgdgogku 推特

6 Nov 2026, 23:00 UTC6 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $NIG SOL 链新项目,发布于 11 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $49.6K | 24h成交量: $730.9K | 24h涨跌: +36.8% 合约地址: GDst7T2Apk4qJsJf1qZG2ndE9HP1jruEPn5izqGwpump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/7jjydawlaznxdcwviotb9vfd6q6ygkrunip3595kbaef 官网 推特

6 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC8 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $CRVL SOL 链新项目,发布于 38 分钟前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $43.5K | 24h成交量: $930.2K | 24h涨跌: +19.0% 合约地址: 4izrpFiuxGXv9vSGxX8RoWQUgXCFMwK5KmbaEhLspump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/6f15z7dnnuyhdwdjfkk7ncwbj2vehvywdz4iwut1ekfn 官网 推特

6 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC6 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $RETIRE SOL 链新项目,发布于 12 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $107.2K | 24h成交量: $609.2K | 24h涨跌: +157.0% 合约地址: 519AMDtBqCpVk8CTYCg2i9kJQH62ZSkT5Uvfn71Upump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/9xgf5yvxsjxtphc11k8tg1b5iu7mxb7dbw9e6qkbrbzm 电报 官网 推特

6 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC10 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

⏰ 5 HOURS TO GO - $LOTA LIVE SOON ⏰ GET BAGS READY 💰 $LOTA launches in just 5 HOURS! This gonna moon. Big push coming after launch. Launch: Today 3 PM UTC Chain: Robinhood Chain Big marketing, KOLs, raids, trending - everything ready. Are you ready? Also contest live Use /invite to win $1000 giveaway - Deadline 09 Nov LOTA GOING TO LIVE SOON 💧 🔗OFFICIAL LINKS: 🌐Website 🧑‍💼Twitter 🍃Chat 🍃Channel 🐪Contract: T…

6 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC10 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $RM SOL 链新项目,发布于 3 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $113.7K | 24h成交量: $1.8M | 24h涨跌: +212.0% 合约地址: EW1b9rcLAJe634mgxb5r4bVYxDoGU37o7YazBzjTpump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/639hxyrwtpmbkv6qjeyfd7wgckgq3ksrkzixb9hjcrbv 推特

6 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC9 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $bracket SOL 链新项目,发布于 2 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $151.1K | 24h成交量: $1.1M | 24h涨跌: +248.0% 合约地址: EFWotn2UtV2c5QXMMHbSzmyrkU7wnfj7VpkNQGr1wk1z 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/5wdfxkkvaxl6rn9jcfzdgtgibszdb7qgzwqqytbc3srk 官网 推特

6 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC8 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $coin SOL 链新项目,发布于 3 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $192.3K | 24h成交量: $1.4M | 24h涨跌: +436.0% 合约地址: GdY4Z6pYUcr3HFrABV5FEZay3J4GnjN1Uzsw6Dvxpump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/gacmbdqtw7hbuev6bwe583yxw5gs9gjgr59gymvygtri 推特

5 Nov 2026, 23:01 UTC11 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $AAAAAAAAAAAAA SOL 链新项目,发布于 1 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $7.7K | 24h成交量: $636.5K | 24h涨跌: -82.1% 合约地址: Bi59TGKZgLa7zVRz1BX3yPg6Cj8wWfZwfNc5FaCApump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/5a3vwdjmr8amdgmvw2viswfwtrfcffqpgf1ujh6qgc1z 推特

5 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC10 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $Democat SOL 链新项目,发布于 20 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $264.0K | 24h成交量: $2.4M | 24h涨跌: +410.0% 合约地址: 9Y1F6dZ6HpjZDYZdYuUGwMbkUiPsyU7WPTqTQU4Tpump 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/et3nwniyfoisp8wrpiccf5at4dzx6qwxu8do4btp8jwb 官网 推特

5 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC7 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🧪 SOL 代币 $MINTED SOL 链新项目,发布于 12 小时前。团队匿名,高风险项目,请自行研究(DYOR),非投资建议。 📊 市值: $177.1K | 24h成交量: $339.4K | 24h涨跌: +382.0% 合约地址: 8crRRo8zpxJaUhnV81hzyqh4JU5RpuvVaP7iCfV2aXVV 图表: https://dexscreener.com/solana/9u7xftzncujq2nlexe4lz93z8dbuzwarjvpaaeezebpk 电报 官网 推特

5 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC9 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

🔮 @Acid_call KOL Hit 10X+ $SLOP SOL 在 141.0K 时发出。当前已达到 1.41M。执行干净利落。 🔮 141.0K 🔮 1.41M 🔮Caller 🔮Twitter 🔮Trade 🔮DEX 🔮Details 🔮DEV 🔮 LEAD KOL - Rank # 🔮

Showing the 12 most recent of 249 posts we hold for @Acid_Call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tork Labs News
@Tork_LabsAnn · 55,376
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Acid Call { 跨链项目推广者 }” (@Acid_Call), 7,388 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Acid_Call.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.