Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for T.A Crypto

Channel

T.A Crypto

@yul_papa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,517subscribers

-1,341 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001896737141
TypeChannel
Username@yul_papa
Description문의 : @yul_pa_pa
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/yul_papa

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5178,8588,187.56 August 2026 — 8,858 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,840 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,768 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,227 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,037 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,543 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,497 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,430 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,380 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,311 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,236 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,194 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,150 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,064 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,955 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,733 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,695 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,644 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,635 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,623 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,618 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,605 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,581 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,558 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,517 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,341. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,316–9,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 23:147,517-41
4 Nov 2026, 15:067,558-23
2 Nov 2026, 01:087,581-24
29 Oct 2026, 19:177,605-13
27 Oct 2026, 02:317,618-5
24 Oct 2026, 01:557,623-12
21 Oct 2026, 08:497,635-9
18 Oct 2026, 16:357,644-51
15 Oct 2026, 07:497,695-38
12 Oct 2026, 09:227,733-222
5 Oct 2026, 23:027,955-109
28 Sept 2026, 17:188,064-86
15 Sept 2026, 15:408,150-44
12 Sept 2026, 03:418,194-42
7 Sept 2026, 14:168,236-75
2 Sept 2026, 22:158,311-69
30 Aug 2026, 17:128,380-50
27 Aug 2026, 07:588,430-67
24 Aug 2026, 12:478,497-46
20 Aug 2026, 19:478,543first reading

Engagement

360 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 7,517 subscribers
Avg views / post
834
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.239%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 360 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held360 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total50,899
Reactions total81
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,400
Videos
≈393
Links
≈7,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 17s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

657 reactions across 220 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤32649.6%
👍26740.6%
😈497.46%
🌚111.67%
🌭20.304%
🍌10.152%
💩10.152%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 221 of the 360 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 657 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 360 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 360 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yul_papa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 360 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 61 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTC207 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

$BTC 이전 3개 사이클의 저점은 각 사이클의 고점으로부터 약 365~406일 후에 나타났습니다. 이러한 과거 패턴을 고려할 때, 현재 4년 사이클의 저점은 11월 말이나 12월경에 형성될 가능성이 높습니다.

❤2

8 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC646 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

😱 Puffpaw는 법적책임 회피를 위한 TGE 완료 Puffpaw는 Bera 체인이 가장 핫할때 전자담배 컨셉으로 프로젝트를 시작했습니다. 당시 Puffpaw가 주장한 수익 구조는 Puffpaw에서 판매하는 전자담배와 액상을 사서 피면 코인이 채굴되고 이는 과거 Move to Earn과 비슷한 폰지구조라고 평가받았는데요 Bera체인 팀은 물론이고 일부 VC들에게 6M 규모 투자도 유치하면서 돈이 되는 폰지구조라는 컨셉을 잡았기 때문에 굉장히 많은 관심을 받았던걸로 기억합니다. 하지만 베라체인 자체가 무너지고 Puffpaw도 자신들의 생각보다 전담을 못팔아서 그런건지 모르겠지만 에어드랍 공지 이후 프로젝트를 유기, 이후 반년 이상 잠수타다가 갑자기 TGE를 발표해서 굉장히 많은 사람들이 해킹당한줄 알았다는데요 공식적인 TGE는 맞지만…

❤2

8 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC738 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

내 주소는 MEXC 흔적 있을까? 체크 사이트 https://mexcwalletchecker.vercel.app/ 만든 사람

7 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC934 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🚨 퍼프퍼(Puffpaw) 폴리마켓 지갑 의혹 퍼프퍼의 $VAPE 토큰 출시와 관련해 폴리마켓에서 수상한 지갑들이 발견됐다는 주장이 나왔네요. Vlad_Web3에 따르면, 폴리마켓에서 Puffpaw 관련 포지션을 보유한 지갑 1,285개의 거래 이력이 매우 적었다고 합니다. • 1,259개는 Puffpaw 관련 마켓 거래 이력만 존재 • 나머지 26개도 Puffpaw를 포함해 거래한 마켓이 5개 이하 여러 폴리마켓 계정이 YES 포지션을 매도한 뒤 자금을 같은 바이낸스 입금 주소로 보내 있다고 하네요. 📎 https://x.com/mahera777/status/2118855964598145442

7 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC861 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

이사람 또 적폐여서 저거 성공햇나봅니다

👍1

7 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC207 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

유행이라는 고디바 모찌를 먹어봤어요 애기입맛이라면 개존맛탱구리입니다 저 이런거 좋아해서 또 먹구 싶은데 구하기도 힘들어서 군침 흘리는 중 나중에 구하기 쉬워지면 꼭 드셔보시죠 자녀분들 있다면 사줘도 너무 좋아할 듯 !

7 Nov 2026, 14:24 UTC598 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

텔레그램과는 다른 MEXC에대한 X 여론 #MEXC

7 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC398 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

최근 가장 핫한 도지&스텔라님 창펑자오 개새끼 3개 시리즈 작성 ㅋㅋ #CZ

7 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC521 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

미 재무부 - MEXC를 주요 자금세탁 우려 금융기관으로 판단 - 미국 금융기관의 MEXC 관련 자금이체를 금지하는 명령을 발령 - 금융 범죄 단속 네트워크(FinCEN) 판단 - 이유 : 이란, 러시아, 북한관련 총 $16.7B 규모 불법금융행위 의심 - 범위 : MEXC 및 관련 법인 모두 범위에 포함 - 미국의 은행, 암호화폐 거래소 등 금융기관들이 MEXC와 직접 자금을 주고받는 행위 자체를 금지 (맥락상 가상자산 포함) 단순히 거래소 금지정도의 뉘앙스가 아니네요. 30일 이후 발효긴 하지만 MEXC에 돈이 있다면 일단 빼둬서 나쁠건 없을듯? https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0685/

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 360 posts we hold for @yul_papa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Republishes 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

CTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,219
16 posts
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,557
12 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,345
8 posts
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,017
7 posts
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,729
4 posts
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,483
3 posts
Midnight Network 한국 공지 채널
@midnight_kor · 3,290
3 posts
부의길목에서 🦅
@stay_news · 7,657
3 posts
라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,898
2 posts
코인소년의 크립토 이야기 🙋‍♂️
@coinboys · 15,462
2 posts
[NEWS] 디지털애셋
@digitalassetnewsroom · 2,015
2 posts
Degen Guy
@justdegenguy · 10,398
2 posts
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,141
2 posts
Web3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 23,155
2 posts
이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,385
2 posts
나백이의 코인라이프
@ysytop2 · 10,379
2 posts
64비트사령부⚡️ 🇰🇷🇺🇸
@BTCpentagon · 6,560
1 post
크립토 부엉이🦉
@CryptoOwlNotice · 7,725
1 post
GMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,169
1 post
Hyperliquid Liquidations
@HyperliquidLiquidations · 12,977
1 post
허위정보채널
@JOOONGDO · 946
1 post
MBM Crypto Insider🦅
@MBMweb3 · 47,180
1 post
AI ARCHIVE
@NEO_AI_ARCHIVE · 677
1 post
생각 정리하는 방
@Thoughts_BFox · 15,061
1 post
채저시급 김으악ㅠ
@Ugh_HH · 9,811
1 post
🤏🏾🫃🏻🌈
@btc_sibal · 6,076
1 post
불개미 시황 + 뻘글 + 살려줘
@fireantrade · 3,211
1 post
고따 일기장
@goraetrackerKR · 7,558
1 post
ICOROOTS_Definalist
@icoroots · 5,404
1 post
Zi존파워잼민
@jammin0720 · 5,729
1 post
Manbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 16,395
1 post
라임라잇 TCG
@limelight_kor · 2,905
1 post
🌸Crypto Judy🐰🌸
@lovejudylee · 41,271
1 post
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,243
1 post
㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,404
1 post
머니스택
@money0stack9Notice · 7,867
1 post
머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,743
1 post
📰 실시간 속보 단독 뉴스
@news_kor · 15,621
1 post
졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,688
1 post
요약하는 고잉
@one_going · 48,080
1 post
PAIGU - Pagu's AI Diary
@paigudiary · 130
1 post
살림꾼 (핫딜알리미)
@salimsale · 47
1 post
게이머 강석오 [Gamer Seoko Kang]
@seokokang · 5,903
1 post
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,347
1 post
시발증일이형!!!!
@sibal12gud · 763
1 post
차트는 예술이다
@tactrine · 1,257
1 post
업비트 Upbit 공식 텔레그램
@upbit_news · 44,700
1 post
매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,427
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Фильмы | Киноклуб Майкл
@Kinoklub_Michael · 21,095
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
ಕನ್ನಡ ಕ್ವಿಜ್‌ ಚಾನೆಲ್‌ | KPSC | KEA | FDA | SDA
@kannada_kpsc_quiz · 39,636
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
Павел Дроздов | Крипто гуру 👳🔮
@DrozdovPavel · 183,628
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 September 2026
تترا |نرخ لحظه‌ای
@tethera_io · 46,231
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“T.A Crypto” (@yul_papa), 7,517 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yul_papa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.