구)멀티코인 카일은 그냥 이제 아주 그냥 멀코랑 적으로 살기로 결심한거 같네요 걍 요즘 글올리는거마다 은근슬쩍 멀티코인 까내리는 글 줄창 올림
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx

Channel
@justicekingsman
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,940subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001645632215 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justicekingsman |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justicekingsman |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:54 | 15,940 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 15,960 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 15,962 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 15,970 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 15,979 | +25 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 15,954 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 15,959 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:09 | 15,967 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:04 | 15,966 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 15,962 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 15,971 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 15,977 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 15,980 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 15,982 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 15,986 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 15,991 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 16,000 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 16,001 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 16,005 | -14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 16,019 | first reading |
216 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 216 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 106,305 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
215 reactions across 106 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 70 | 32.6% | |
| 😱 | 60 | 27.9% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 12.1% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 10.7% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 6.98% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 3.72% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 3.26% | |
| 🤷 | 5 | 2.33% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.465% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 216 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
구)멀티코인 카일은 그냥 이제 아주 그냥 멀코랑 적으로 살기로 결심한거 같네요 걍 요즘 글올리는거마다 은근슬쩍 멀티코인 까내리는 글 줄창 올림
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
아니 근데 이거 에릭이 정말 충분히 합리적인 의문을 제기한거 같은데 트위터보면 욕을 엄청 먹네요.. 공식아니고 수상한점 있는거 맞는데 쩝
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
솔라나가 기대한거 : 펌펀 / 주피터 / 메테오라 / 타이탄 같은 디앱에서 돈 턱턱써서 기부하는 멋있는 노블리스 오블리주 체인이미지 현실 : 줏 카지노 도박장,뭔지도 모르는 개스캠프로젝트 집합소
🤷5
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
참고로 요 유니스왑 Eric은 사기같다고 조심하라고 글을쓰긴했습니다. 이거 로빈후드에 공식으로 토큰화 한거아니고 그냥.... 자체적으로 컨트랙트 찍은거에요 https://x.com/ericzhong/status/2095173089927532605?s=20
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
징티안은 엄청난 거래량과 하입으로 로빈후드의 모든 코인의 유동성을 흡수하고 있는데.. 로빈후드 체인에 있는 FAMI 주식 유동성은 단 1M 달러치 밖에 안됩니다. 그러다보니, 이게 말도안되게 로빈후드 FAMI가 높은 가격에 거래되고 있는데 이거 들고온 mm 들은 이제.. 개잡주 들고와서 로빈후드에 가져다 팔면 싹싹김치가 되겠죠.. 개잡주를 로빈후드 체인에서 올렸다라는 뉴스를 통해 사람들이 크립토에 관심을 가지게될 계기는 되겠지만 쩝 이게 이렇게 잘되어버려서.. 이제 모든 개잡주 스캠주식들이 로빈후드에 밈코를 내는 현상들이 발생할거 같긴하네요 트럼프 이후로 등장한 인플루언서 메타가 생각납니다
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.... 진짜 자존심 싸움 무엇
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
$FLORK live on Binance alpha
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
아까 우미아 뜬금없이 200k 매수트잭?이 하나 있었던거 같은데 그게 이더몽크였나보네요
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
우미아는 약 80% 정도 수익이긴하네요 세일 참여시에 첨에 리퀴안넣어줘서 좃망인줄 알았는데 이정도면 나름 선방한거 같아서 다행...
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
바이낸스 선물에 최근에 상장한 니우라이와 마스코인... 은 나란히 하락율 탑랭크에....
😱1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
오늘 9시에 Umia 상장하는데 생각보다 되게 조용하기도하고 이거 넣을때만해도 베이스캣이고 뭐고 베이스에 조금은 훈풍이 부는줄 알았는데, 베이스가 아주 차디찬 상태라 갑자기 좀 싸늘해지긴 했지만.. 18밀이라는 나름.. 싸다면싸고 비싸다면 비싼 벨류에 세일을 한만큼.. 손실만 안보게 해주면 정말 좋겠네요.ㅠ 세일할때 정말 다사다난했던 기분인데... TGE이후도 다사다난할까봐 걱정이... 우미아의 벨류? 라는것을 비교할만한 친구는 메타다오가 있어요. 메타다오가 훨씬 선두주자고 잘하고 있는 상태인데 110밀이니 우미아는 그것보다는 당연히 싸지않을까 싶네요. 해외에 들려오는 소문(이라고부르고 반쯤 망상)에는 꽤 괜찮은 VC가 들어올거라고 들었는데... 얼른 공개되면 좋겠습니다. 암튼 우미아 들어가신분들 화이팅! 해외에서는 50~60밀? …
👍1🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
정말 엄청난 돈복사 같고 운이라고 느껴지실수도 있는데 개인적으로는 이번 이벤트의 수익은 모든 이벤트가 터지면 일단 어케되던간에 다 해보는 성실한 슈퍼 성실상+개근상의 결과물인거 같네요. 한국분들도 많이 드신걸로 알고 있는데 축하드립니다. 역시 성실함은 보상을 준다
⚡1🥰1😢1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
Showing the 12 most recent of 216 posts we hold for @justicekingsman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@justicekingsman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방” (@justicekingsman), 15,940 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justicekingsman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.