Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 마인부우의 크립토볼

Channel

마인부우의 크립토볼

@minebuu_cryptoball

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,792subscribers

+219 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584183723
TypeChannel
Username@minebuu_cryptoball
Created16 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/minebuu_cryptoball

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,50510,79210,648.56 August 2026 — 10,573 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,573 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,567 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,558 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,553 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,551 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,545 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,540 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,533 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,529 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,524 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,518 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,508 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,514 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,515 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,518 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,517 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,514 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,510 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,512 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,519 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,608 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,659 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,662 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,667 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,706 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,715 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,718 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,717 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,712 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,718 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,714 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,792 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +219. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,462–10,835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:2010,792+78
17 Sept 2026, 02:2010,714-4
15 Sept 2026, 03:4210,718+6
13 Sept 2026, 12:5810,712-5
11 Sept 2026, 20:0110,717-1
9 Sept 2026, 06:3610,718+3
5 Sept 2026, 20:2010,715+9
3 Sept 2026, 19:5510,706+39
2 Sept 2026, 14:1910,667+5
1 Sept 2026, 13:1310,662+3
31 Aug 2026, 15:4610,659+51
30 Aug 2026, 12:3710,608+89
29 Aug 2026, 12:2510,519+7
27 Aug 2026, 13:0410,512+2
26 Aug 2026, 15:2710,510-4
25 Aug 2026, 13:0710,514-3
24 Aug 2026, 09:5310,517-1
22 Aug 2026, 13:5810,518+3
21 Aug 2026, 03:4210,515+1
20 Aug 2026, 07:1310,514first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 10,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,850
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.137%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held74 (29 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total40,613
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 19s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 59 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13083.3%
👍1811.5%
👀42.56%
🔥31.92%
🙏10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,380 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

포모 한국 공지방 오픈 t.me/fomo_korea 봉크가이와 같은 유명 KOL들을 필두로 코인 트렌드를 빠르게 따라갈 수 있고, 돈을 입금하면 체인간 구분 없이 쉽고 편하게 온체인 거래를 할 수 있는, 요새 급격히 성장중인 트레이딩 앱 FOMO 특히 요새 로빈후드 체인에서 fomo가 가진 영향력이 엄청난데, fomo verification 인증 단 애들이 인증만으로도 오를정도로 엄청난 영향력을 가진 플랫폼으로 발전하고 있습니다 한국 공지방에서 FOMO의 새로운 소식들 트래킹 레츠고

4

Signed minebuu

1 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC193 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @NewListingsFeed

$MARSCOIN listed on Binance futures

Signed minebuu

31 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC≈1,070 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

하이퍼리퀴드 Pons 상장 주말 동안 폰즈, 로빈후드의 거래량이 정말 많이 터져서 이제 하이퍼리퀴드에도 상장됐네요 어제의 프로토콜 순수익은 대략 400k 후반일것 같고, 바이백 지갑엔 현재 337이더 정도가 들어있습니다. 로빈후드도 이제 상장 해야겠지?

6

Signed minebuu

30 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,990 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

온체인 불장엔 UNI

1

Signed minebuu

30 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,520 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

이전에 소개드렸던 PAIR.FUN은 오늘 $PAIR 플랫폼 토큰을 출시했네요 근데 너무 갑작스럽게 출시하기도했고, 플랫폼 거래량에 비해 너무 고시총이여서 (현재 4M) 흠... 1M 언더면 좀 많이 사보겠는데 우선 조금만 사봤고 조정을 기다려볼 것 같아요 약간 또 이상한 부분이 출시하자마자 봉크가이한테 전체 물량의 3%를 보내버렸어요. FOMO 봉크가이 계정을 사람들이 많이 모니터링하기 때문에 홍보 효과를 노린 것 같은데 살짝 꾸리꾸리하긴합니다. 봉크가이는 오늘 기부를 통해서만 1.7억을 복사했어요 암튼 이전에 올린글 트래킹 차원에서 올렸고 절대 사란 소리 아닙니다. 플랫폼 거래량이 의미있게 상승해야 좀 쳐다볼것 같아요. 아직은 관심이 부족한 편

2

Signed minebuu

30 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC≈4,000 views16 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

PONS 게시글을 꾸준히 썻었는데 잘되서 기분이 좋네요 일단 로빈후드 네러티브가 크게 와줬다는 점에서 운이 좋았고, 특히 PONS의 개발자인 Ozzy (MEADGod)이 다른 런치 플랫폼들이 나와도 뻘짓안하고 묵묵히 계속 일해서 런치패드 점유율 1위를 유지할 수 있었던게 컸던것 같아요 어쩃든 RWA 밈이 이제 어디까지 갈지 잘모르겠지만 그동안 많이 오른것 같아서 30%만 익절하고, 나머지 70%는 가져가려고 합니다. 거의 처음 샀을 때 대비 45배 전체 평단 16배가 올랐는데, 길게 가져가고 싶어서 오히려 일부 익절을 택했습니다. 일부 익절해야 마음이 편하고, 그래야 오래 들고갈 수 있더라고요 가격이 급상승했음에도 폰즈의 온체인 수치를 보면 아직 상승 여력이 충분하다는 것을 알 수 있습니다. 최근 일간 수익이 300k 근처로 급격히 상승

16

Signed minebuu

29 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈1,420 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

microduck 샀어요 ㄹㅇ졸귀

3

Signed minebuu

29 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC≈1,390 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

팽구는 이제 로빈후드에서도 거래되도록 지원 0x74BE72AFFAFbC8de30F0C11247814036314D625f 우리 팽구 열일 중

1🔥1

Signed minebuu

29 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

펏지가 피규어 장난감 회사인 Schleich와 파트너쉽을 맺어서 새로운 장난감을 출시했네요 이번에 귀엽고, 가격도 합리적으로 잘 나온것 같아요 https://www.pudgypenguins.com/products/pudgy-penguins-x-schleich-set

Signed minebuu

28 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 1 September 2026

는 이더스캔 아니라 이더스캔짭 툴이네요.. 블록스카웃 미안해 한동안 계속 보자 이더스캔의 경우 체인당 계약금이 $1m+을 넘어가서 아직 계약을 안했나봐요

Signed minebuu

28 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈4,340 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026

로빈후드 드디어 이더스캔 입갤 https://robinscan.io/ 잘가라 블록스카웃 다신 보지말자

👍2

Signed minebuu

28 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈2,020 views0 reactionsread 1 September 2026

왜 주식 하나만 밈코에 묶어야돼? 주식 바스켓을 묶자 로빈후드에서 주식 페어링 밈코들이 잘나가는 가운데 뭐 더 없나 찾다가 하나의 주식이 아닌 "여러개 주식을 바스켓 처럼 묶어" 페어링 하여 밈코를 출시하게 해주는 플랫폼을 발견 PAIR.FUND라는 곳인데 지금 2개가 졸업해서 거래되고 있음 1. CHIPS (0xbcd09284dffe06f868a4650546233e3e9abe4d97): NVIDIA, AMD, INTEL 3개의 주식과 묶여있는 밈코. 저 3곳의 회사 모두 반도체 칩을 만드는 곳이기에 밈코이름도 CHIPS 2. PEAR(0x3567c5d0ae5c5933920bbd6db982aa463a203bb2): 플랫폼 최초 밈코. AAPL. MSFT, NVIDIA 주식들과 페어 특히 1번의 CHIPS이름보고 재치있다 생각했음.

Signed minebuu

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @minebuu_cryptoball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,120
6 posts
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,139
3 posts
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,934
3 posts
에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,514
2 posts
Abstract Korea 🇰🇷
@abstractkorea · 342
2 posts
종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 8,801
2 posts
인생코인
@lnsanecoin · 7,610
2 posts
Loot Korea
@lootprojectko · 116
2 posts
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,998
2 posts
돈독이 바짝 오른 돈독킹
@Dondoking · 33
1 post
꿀찾는 양말이♥️
@Honeyofwhitesocks · 1,075
1 post
MBM Crypto Insider🦅
@MBMweb3 · 55,206
1 post
HolyMoly 🌏
@NFTHUNTERS1 · 117
1 post
라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,980
1 post
AI-meda Research
@aimedaresearch · 877
1 post
브라이언홍
@apac · 3,852
1 post
방구석 CRYPTO
@bangguseokcrypto · 2,071
1 post
Z's Reading Dump
@cryptoarchive_by_z · 28
1 post
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 9,462
1 post
싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 10,459
1 post
그냥 쉬었음 물개
@damggudonggu · 1,048
1 post
돌곰배와 매직 코인일기
@dolgommagic · 11,730
1 post
🤧 도묵이와 코딱지들 🤧
@domuks · 109
1 post
오리 이노치 리써치 (스폰서환영)
@enochmemos · 2,899
1 post
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,960
1 post
미래 금융, RWA가 다가왔다(오픈베타, 공사 중)
@futurefinancerwa · 290
1 post
영서의 일기장
@hedwigdiary · 233
1 post
Degen Guy
@justdegenguy · 8,597
1 post
Manbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 15,940
1 post
이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,030
1 post
Crypto Crunch 공지방
@makecryptoeasyy · 1,588
1 post
Mutt Technologies
@mutt_tech · 1,387
1 post
빛나는 지금 ☀️
@nowlsthebrightest · 936
1 post
에드작이 미래다
@pangdung · 2,726
1 post
🇰🇷 펏지펭귄 공식 공지방
@pudgypenguinskr · 1,944
1 post
The ticker is ETH
@thetickeriseth · 1,525
1 post
Coin Watcher
@watchercoin · 15
1 post
이것저것 다하는 방
@web3_laborer · 7,598
1 post
돈기부여 숙제방
@wreckcarbluebird · 501
1 post
Xbyus_News
@xbyus_news · 1,790
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

우리는 트윗충
@twitchoong · 74,250
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,385
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
갓물주 (코인정보, 돈되는거)
@godmulzoo · 22,946
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,973
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,814
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“마인부우의 크립토볼” (@minebuu_cryptoball), 10,792 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minebuu_cryptoball.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.