이거 얼마짜리 트윗이지
❤2🤯1
Signed minebuu

Channel
@minebuu_cryptoball
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,733subscribers
+160 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001584183723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @minebuu_cryptoball |
| Description | 크립토 관련 정보를 올립니다. 채널 운영자의 주관적인 생각이 반영될 수 있습니다. 공지방: https://t.me/minebuu_cryptoball 채팅방: https://t.me/chat_cryptoball 관리자: @minebuu @xxxkkaz |
| Created | 16 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/minebuu_cryptoball |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 10,733 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 10,735 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:00 | 10,742 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:20 | 10,748 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:29 | 10,752 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 10,753 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 10,754 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 10,759 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 10,764 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 10,772 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 10,773 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 10,778 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 10,776 | +11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 10,765 | +49 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 10,716 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 10,725 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 10,733 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 10,734 | -6 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 10,740 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:48 | 10,742 | first reading |
104 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 104 (29 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 39,842 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
212 reactions across 86 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 179 | 84.4% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 10.4% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 1.89% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.943% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.472% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.472% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
이거 얼마짜리 트윗이지
❤2🤯1
Signed minebuu
$red 테더의 하드론(Hadron)이 레드스톤(RedStone)과 협력하여 토큰화된 자산의 가격 책정, 결제 및 유동성 인프라를 확장합니다 원문
❤1
Signed minebuu
Theo가 골드를 토큰화하자 20% 하락했다 Theo가 실버를 토큰화하자 50% 하락했다 Theo가 지금 GPU를 토큰화 하려고 한다
Signed minebuu
미라가 출시하는 AI 추론 서비스인 스털링(Sterling) https://x.com/miranetwork/status/2118252068855333067?a=rW4KOJ00IyNBhAPF5TY 추론 공급업체가 저렴한 모델로 바꿔치기하여 답변을 해도 소비자가 이를 감지하기는 어려운데요. 실제로 미라가 테스트한결과 gpt-oss-120b를 여러 추론 제공업체에 테스트해봤을 때 업체 간의 성능 차이가 심하게 발생했다고 합니다. 최근 앤트로픽에서는 이를 해결하기 위한 리서치로 zk를 통해 "질문과 답변을 어떠한 모델로 실행시켰다"를 검증할 수 있는 연구를 발표하기도 했었죠 (추론 증명 연구). 문제는 위 앤트로픽의 추론 연구의 경우 너무 많은 비용이 발생하기 때문에 아직은 적용하기에 무리가 있습니다. 따라서 미라의 경우엔 실제 쿼리를 모델 제…
Signed minebuu
📣 가상자산 과세 2년 유예 확정되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 보도, 참고자료 코인과세가 2년 공식 유예되었습니다. 여당, 야당 모두 당대표가 공식 건의하고 행정부까지 동의했습니다. 세법개정안 개정은 확정이고 연말 표결만 거치면 됩니다. 2년 유예와 함께, 3년간의 손실 이월공제도 재정경제부 발표에 포함되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 부총리 브리핑 자료 원문보러가기 정말 수고 많으셨습니다.
❤3👍1
Signed minebuu
최근 흥미로웠던 PropAMM 공격사례 Solana 에서 PropAMM을 운영하는 ZeroFI가 SPCX/USDC 풀을 운영하는데, PropAMM 설계 오류인지, 시장의 오류인지 등으로 인해 0.08bps 스프레드가 생겼고, 이걸 포착한 슈퍼 MM 아비트라져들이 무려 거래당 0.0044달러 (약 6원)의 수익을 700k번 정도 수행해서 약 2k 정도 아비트라지 수익을 올렸다는 이야기.. 6월 쌀먹을 수십만번해서 수백만원을 벌어낸.. 슈퍼 아비트라져도 대단한데 0.08bps까지 봇으로 슥삭슥삭 해먹는거보면 참 솔라나에 어마무시한 괴물들이 즐비하구나~ 싶었네요. 그나저나 이 500m 거래량 아비트라지는 Backpack의 rwa토큰으로 이뤄진거라 백팩의 거래량이 푹 튀었네요.
❤1
Signed minebuu
TreasureDAO($MAGIC), 토큰 50% 추가 발행해서 AI 에이전트 DePIN으로 피벗 제안 (TIP-63) https://x.com/Treasure_DAO/status/2118109096058421251?a=H55-ka2rmg5NVqT9KVU - MAGIC을 최대 50%(1억 7,300만 개) 추가 발행해서 'AI 에이전트를 돌리는 DePIN 네트워크'로 피벗하는 것을 목표로 함 - 커뮤니티 투표가 통과할 경우 27년 2월 3일에 1억 개(+28.8%)가 재단으로 풀림. 나머지 7,300만 개는 에이전트 수, 스테이킹률, 소각량 같은 마일스톤 10개를 달성할 때마다 730만 개씩 풀리는 구조 - 의견 수렴: 11/4~11/18 - 투표: 11/18~12/2 - 1차 발행: 2027/2/3 - 네트워크 런칭: 2027/3/3 …
❤1
Signed minebuu
: : [크립토/이슈] 바이낸스 해킹 사고를 바라보며 작성자: 캘빈 - 2026년 10월 30일 오전 5시 4분부터 바이낸스의 10개 체인 핫월렛에서 역대 최대 규모인 $6.36B의 자산이 탈취되었으며, 그 대부분은 약 20분 사이에 빠져나갔다. FBI는 북한의 트레이더트레이터(TraderTraitor)를 배후로 지목했고, 이들이 최근 일으킨 거래소 해킹들과 마찬가지로 단순 개인키가 아닌 내부 서명 인프라가 침해된 것으로 보인다. - 테더와 써클은 사고 1시간 안에 약 $2.4B의 스테이블코인을 동결했고, 아비트럼 보안위원회와 토큰 프로젝트들의 관리자 권한까지 더해지며 탈취 자산 중 $2.8B 이상이 동결 혹은 회수되었다. 바이낸스 역시 외부 차입 없이 $6.34B을 마련해 손실을 보전했다. 준비금 증명(Proof of Reserves)과…
❤1
Signed minebuu
로빈후드의 추론 마켓인 Orbio는 여기 언급되진 않았는데 오늘 28% 이상 상승했습니다. https://x.com/0x_aster/status/2117686253038755857?a=bDhWzVpdook3AanFC0A&s=20 오늘부터 프라이버시 중심의 OpenRouter를 표방하며 프라이버시를 강조하는 업데이트를 했어요. 또 모든 사용자에게 $2의 크레딧을 제공하여 처음에 써볼 수 있는 크레딧을 제공하기로 했네요. 이전부터 phala TEE를 쓴다고하긴했는데 플랫폼 자체의 방향이 본격적으로 private inference로 방향을 트는 것 같습니다. Orbio의 개발자인 Yash의 트윗을 보면 Venice에서는 종단 간 암호화 (E2EE)기능을 쓰려면 Pro 구독을 해야하는데 Orbio에서는 구독 없이 사용량 기반으로 차감하고 E2E…
❤1
Signed minebuu
로빈후드 크립토의 체인 지표 정리와 플젝 샤라웃들 https://x.com/RobinhoodCrypto/status/2117709284108579041?a=hNjw3oOe6JRWfT2kreQ 체인 지표들 - TVL 상위 프로토콜: Morpho $582.17M, Uniswap $280.9M, Lighter $112.02M, Arcus $63.61M, Upon $4.52M - 로빈후드 체인 TVL: $1.07B - 누적 DEX 거래량: $120.46B - 런칭 125일 만에, 유니스왑에서 거래량 $100B를 가장 빨리 달성한 체인 빌더 지원으로서는 아비트럼과 함께 상시 프로그램으로 멘토링, 자금 지원을 수행하고 있다고 밝힘 빋더로서 언급된 프로젝트들 중 로빈후드 네이티브 플젝 목록 - Priors ($PRIORS): 로빈후드 체인에 새…
Signed minebuu
Jumper의 perp dex에 RWA 선물 거래가 저번주에 라이브됐었네요 https://x.com/arjunnchand/status/2115474159061074079 10월 28일부터 RWA 퍼프 거래가 시작되었는데 온도 Perps를 통해 이를 지원하네요. 이번 협업으로 Ondo 측에서 57,000불을 점프 트레이더를 위한 주간 리워드로 배정했네요. 점프의 perps에서는 이제 Ondo까지 지원하게 되면서 하이퍼리퀴드, 라이터, 온도, 로빈후드로 총 4가지 마켓을 지원하게 되었는데 perp 어그리게이터가 되어가고 있는 모습이네요. Ondo perps 마켓이 하이퍼리퀴드 마켓보다 거래량이 적긴 하지만 제공해주는 인센티브가 커서 조금 써볼만한 것 같아요. 앞서 말한 주간 57,000불 보상도 있고 RWA 선물 거래 시 점프의 포인트인 …
❤1
Signed minebuu
CFTC , 미국 거래소에서 거래를 위한 최초의 주식 영구 선물 계약을 승인 https://x.com/247Wire/status/2117617335926243592
❤2
Signed minebuu
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @minebuu_cryptoball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“마인부우의 크립토볼” (@minebuu_cryptoball), 10,733 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minebuu_cryptoball.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.